• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创新效率在协调经济与生态环境发展中的隐性中介作用:来自中国 283 个城市的证据。

The hidden mediating role of innovation efficiency in coordinating development of economy and ecological environment: evidence from 283 Chinese cities.

机构信息

School of Business Administration, Northeastern University, Shenyang, 110167, China.

Institute of the Central China Development, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072, China.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Sep;28(34):47668-47684. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-13808-7. Epub 2021 Apr 24.

DOI:10.1007/s11356-021-13808-7
PMID:33893586
Abstract

The advancement of technological innovations may facilitate the coordinated development of the economy and ecological environment (EGE); however, few studies have noted the role of innovation efficiency (INEF) as a bridge between economic development and EGE. To fill in this gap, this paper adopts DMSP/OLS nighttime light data to measure the level of economic development and the improved data envelopment analysis model to measure INEF, establishing an index system to quantify EGE. Then we propose the panel threshold-mediating (PTM) model that combines the panel threshold model and the mediating effect model. On these bases, considering INEF as a mediator, we use this novel PTM model to empirically test the nonlinear relationship between economic development and EGE in 283 Chinese cities from 2003 to 2018. The results indicate that (1) while economic development can improve EGE, its positive impact on EGE differs with different INEF thresholds. A higher INEF threshold indicates a stronger positive effect of economic development on EGE. (2) For the entire sample, the mediating effect of INEF between economic development and EGE is not significant. However, after applying the PTM model, we found that the mediating effect of INEF was concealed by the sample population. (3) When INEF is lower than 0.2381, its complete mediating effect is verified. When INEF is higher than 0.2381, its mediating effect is not significant. On the contrary, economic development directly improves EGE. (4) Industrial agglomeration, the scale of government expenditure, residents' education level, degree of opening up, and transport infrastructure are all conducive to EGE. These findings can help cities at different INEF levels to achieve coordinated development of economy and EGE.

摘要

技术创新的进步可能促进经济和生态环境(EGE)的协调发展;然而,很少有研究注意到创新效率(INEF)作为经济发展和 EGE 之间的桥梁的作用。为了填补这一空白,本文采用 DMSP/OLS 夜间灯光数据来衡量经济发展水平,并采用改进的数据包络分析模型来衡量 INEF,建立了一个量化 EGE 的指标体系。然后,我们提出了面板门限中介(PTM)模型,该模型结合了面板门限模型和中介效应模型。在此基础上,考虑到 INEF 作为中介变量,我们使用这种新颖的 PTM 模型,从 2003 年到 2018 年,实证检验了 283 个中国城市经济发展与 EGE 之间的非线性关系。结果表明:(1)虽然经济发展可以改善 EGE,但它对 EGE 的积极影响因不同的 INEF 门槛而异。较高的 INEF 门槛意味着经济发展对 EGE 的积极影响更强。(2)对于整个样本,INEF 在经济发展和 EGE 之间的中介效应不显著。然而,在应用 PTM 模型后,我们发现 INEF 的中介效应被样本人口所掩盖。(3)当 INEF 低于 0.2381 时,验证了其完全中介效应。当 INEF 高于 0.2381 时,其中介效应不显著。相反,经济发展直接改善了 EGE。(4)产业集聚、政府支出规模、居民受教育水平、开放程度和交通基础设施都有利于 EGE。这些发现可以帮助处于不同 INEF 水平的城市实现经济和 EGE 的协调发展。

相似文献

1
The hidden mediating role of innovation efficiency in coordinating development of economy and ecological environment: evidence from 283 Chinese cities.创新效率在协调经济与生态环境发展中的隐性中介作用:来自中国 283 个城市的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Sep;28(34):47668-47684. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-13808-7. Epub 2021 Apr 24.
2
Government R&D Subsidies, Environmental Regulations, and Their Effect on Green Innovation Efficiency of Manufacturing Industry: Evidence from the Yangtze River Economic Belt of China.政府研发补贴、环境法规及其对中国长江经济带制造业绿色创新效率的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 19;17(4):1330. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17041330.
3
The Impact of Coordinated Development of Ecological Environment and Technological Innovation on Green Economy: Evidence from China.生态环境与技术创新协同发展对绿色经济的影响:来自中国的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 7;19(12):6994. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19126994.
4
Does Innovation Efficiency Suppress the Ecological Footprint? Empirical Evidence from 280 Chinese Cities.创新效率是否抑制了生态足迹?来自中国 280 个城市的经验证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 18;17(18):6826. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186826.
5
Promoting sustainable development: Revisiting digital economy agglomeration and inclusive green growth through two-tier stochastic frontier model.促进可持续发展:通过双层随机前沿模型重新审视数字经济集聚与包容性绿色增长
J Environ Manage. 2024 Mar;355:120491. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120491. Epub 2024 Mar 3.
6
Understanding the Heterogeneous Impact of Innovation Efficiency on Urban Ecological Footprint in China.理解创新效率对中国城市生态足迹的异质影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 16;19(10):6054. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19106054.
7
Does industrial collaborative agglomeration improve environmental efficiency? Insights from China's population structure.产业协同集聚是否提高了环境效率?来自中国人口结构的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jan;29(4):5072-5091. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-15618-3. Epub 2021 Aug 20.
8
Dynamic Threshold Effect of Directed Technical Change Suppress on Urban Carbon Footprint in China.定向技术变革抑制对中国城市碳足迹的动态阈值效应
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 23;19(9):5151. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095151.
9
[Spatial and temporal evolution of the ecological environment and economy coordinated development in Hebei Province, China.].[中国河北省生态环境与经济协调发展的时空演变]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2016 Sep;27(9):2941-2949. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201609.030.
10
Dynamics, differences, influencing factors of eco-efficiency in China: A spatiotemporal perspective analysis.中国生态效率的动态、差异及影响因素:时空视角分析。
J Environ Manage. 2020 Jun 15;264:110442. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110442. Epub 2020 Apr 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Sponge City Construction and Urban Economic Sustainable Development: An Ecological Philosophical Perspective.海绵城市建设与城市经济可持续发展:生态哲学视角
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 17;20(3):1694. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20031694.
2
Empirical Study on the Influence of Urban Environmental Industrial Structure Optimization on Ecological Landscape Greening Construction.城市环境产业结构优化对生态景观绿化建设影响的实证研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 15;19(24):16842. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192416842.
3
Can Green Innovation Improve Regional Environmental Carrying Capacity? An Empirical Analysis from China.
绿色创新能否提高区域环境承载力?来自中国的实证分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 11;19(20):13034. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192013034.
4
Can Inbound Tourism Improve Regional Ecological Efficiency? An Empirical Analysis from China.入境旅游能否提高区域生态效率?来自中国的实证分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 27;19(19):12282. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912282.
5
The Scheme of Ecological Environment Governance under International Discourse Power from the Perspective of Ecological Civilization.生态文明观下国际话语权力中的生态环境治理方案。
J Environ Public Health. 2022 Sep 20;2022:3367200. doi: 10.1155/2022/3367200. eCollection 2022.
6
Spatiotemporal Regularity and Socioeconomic Drivers of the AQI in the Yangtze River Delta of China.中国长三角地区空气质量指数的时空规律及其社会经济驱动因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 25;19(15):9017. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159017.
7
Spatial Pattern of Technological Innovation in the Yangtze River Delta Region and Its Impact on Water Pollution.长三角地区技术创新的空间格局及其对水污染的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 17;19(12):7437. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19127437.
8
Environmental Performance Evaluation of Key Polluting Industries in China-Taking the Power Industry as an Example.中国重点污染行业环境绩效评价——以电力行业为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 14;19(12):7295. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19127295.
9
What Affects Rural Ecological Environment Governance Efficiency? Evidence from China.是什么影响了农村生态环境治理效率?来自中国的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 13;19(10):5925. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19105925.
10
The Threshold Effect of Urban Levels on Environmental Collaborative Governance: An Empirical Analysis from Chinese Cities.城市层级对环境协同治理的门槛效应:来自中国城市的实证分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 27;19(7):3980. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19073980.