Ahmed Anam, van den Muijsenbergh Maria E T C, Mewes Janne C, Wodchis Walter P, Vrijhoef Hubertus J M
Panaxea, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Primary and Community Care, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands.
BMJ Open. 2021 Apr 24;11(4):e043280. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043280.
To identify the relationships between the context in which integrated care programmes (ICPs) for community-dwelling frail older people are applied, the mechanisms by which the programmes do (not) work and the outcomes resulting from this interaction by establishing a programme theory.
Rapid realist review.
Reviews and meta-analyses (January 2013-January 2019) and non-peer-reviewed literature (January 2013-December 2019) reporting on integrated care for community-dwelling frail older people (≥60 years).
Selection and appraisal of documents was based on relevance and rigour according to the Realist And Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards criteria. Data on context, mechanisms, programme activities and outcomes were extracted. Factors were categorised into the five strategies of the WHO framework of integrated people-centred health services (IPCHS).
27 papers were included. The following programme theory was developed: it is essential to establish multidisciplinary teams of competent healthcare providers (HCPs) providing person-centred care, closely working together and communicating effectively with other stakeholders. Older people and informal caregivers should be involved in the care process. Financial support, efficient use of information technology and organisational alignment are also essential. ICPs demonstrate positive effects on the functionality of older people, satisfaction of older people, informal caregivers and HCPs, and a delayed placement in a nursing home. Heterogeneous effects were found for hospital-related outcomes, quality of life, healthcare costs and use of healthcare services. The two most prevalent WHO-IPCHS strategies as part of ICPs are 'creating an enabling environment', followed by 'strengthening governance and accountability'.
Currently, most ICPs do not address all WHO-IPCHS strategies. In order to optimise ICPs for frail older people the interaction between context items, mechanisms, programme activities and the outcomes should be taken into account from different perspectives (system, organisation, service delivery, HCP and patient).
通过建立项目理论,确定针对社区体弱老年人的综合护理计划(ICP)的应用背景、计划(未)发挥作用的机制以及这种相互作用产生的结果之间的关系。
快速现实主义综述。
2013年1月至2019年1月的综述和荟萃分析,以及2013年1月至2019年12月的非同行评审文献,报告针对社区体弱老年人(≥60岁)的综合护理情况。
根据现实主义和元叙事证据综合:不断发展的标准,基于相关性和严谨性对文献进行筛选和评估。提取有关背景、机制、项目活动和结果的数据。将因素分类为世界卫生组织以人为本的综合卫生服务框架(IPCHS)的五种策略。
纳入27篇论文。得出以下项目理论:建立由称职的医疗保健提供者(HCP)组成的多学科团队至关重要,这些团队提供以人为本的护理,紧密合作并与其他利益相关者有效沟通。老年人和非正式护理人员应参与护理过程。财政支持、有效利用信息技术和组织协调也很重要。ICP对老年人的功能、老年人、非正式护理人员和HCP的满意度以及延迟入住养老院具有积极影响。在与医院相关的结果、生活质量、医疗保健成本和医疗服务使用方面发现了异质性影响。作为ICP一部分的世卫组织-IPCHS最普遍的两种策略是“创造有利环境”,其次是“加强治理和问责制”。
目前,大多数ICP并未涵盖世卫组织-IPCHS的所有策略。为了优化针对体弱老年人的ICP,应从不同角度(系统、组织、服务提供、HCP和患者)考虑背景因素、机制、项目活动和结果之间的相互作用。