• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

荷兰专家对老年人综合护理的共识:一项德尔菲研究。

Consensus on Integrated Care for Older People Among Dutch Experts: A Delphi Study.

作者信息

Ahmed Anam, van den Muijsenbergh Maria Etc, Vrijhoef Hubertus Jm

机构信息

Panaxea b.v., Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Int J Integr Care. 2021 Dec 8;21(4):30. doi: 10.5334/ijic.5682. eCollection 2021 Oct-Dec.

DOI:10.5334/ijic.5682
PMID:34963759
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8663748/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In a previous rapid realist review (RRR), an initial programme theory (PT) was established giving insight into the interrelatedness of context items, mechanisms, programme-activities, and outcomes that influence integrated care programmes (ICPs) for community-dwelling frail older people. As ICPs need to be tailored to their local setting, the objective of this study is to assess consensus on the relevance of the items identified in the RRR for the Dutch setting, and refine the PT, where appropriate.

METHODS

A two-round e-Delphi study was carried out among Dutch experts to determine the relevance of 71 items.

RESULTS

Consensus on relevance was reached on 57 out of 71 items (80%). Items added to refine the PT included: increasing number of older people, decreasing access to hospital beds, well-designed ICP implementation processes, case management, having a clear portfolio of patients, the role of the government, aligning existing health and social care systems, management and monitoring of care activities, strong relationship between older person and healthcare providers (HCP), and providing continuous feedback to HCPs.

CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION

The initial PT was refined for the Dutch setting. Items on which no consensus was found, need to be further investigated on the reason behind it.

摘要

引言

在之前的一项快速实证综述(RRR)中,建立了一个初始项目理论(PT),该理论深入探讨了影响社区居住体弱老年人综合护理项目(ICP)的背景因素、机制、项目活动和结果之间的相互关联性。由于ICP需要根据当地情况进行调整,本研究的目的是评估RRR中确定的项目对于荷兰情况的相关性的共识,并在适当情况下完善PT。

方法

在荷兰专家中开展了两轮电子德尔菲研究,以确定71个项目的相关性。

结果

71个项目中有57个(80%)达成了相关性共识。为完善PT而增加的项目包括:老年人数量增加、医院床位可及性降低、精心设计的ICP实施流程、病例管理、拥有明确的患者组合、政府的作用、整合现有卫生和社会护理系统、护理活动的管理和监测、老年人与医疗保健提供者(HCP)之间的紧密关系以及向HCP提供持续反馈。

结论与讨论

初始PT针对荷兰情况进行了完善。未达成共识的项目需要进一步调查其背后的原因。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae9a/8663748/8eae27467ff3/ijic-21-4-5682-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae9a/8663748/8eae27467ff3/ijic-21-4-5682-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae9a/8663748/8eae27467ff3/ijic-21-4-5682-g1.jpg

相似文献

1
Consensus on Integrated Care for Older People Among Dutch Experts: A Delphi Study.荷兰专家对老年人综合护理的共识:一项德尔菲研究。
Int J Integr Care. 2021 Dec 8;21(4):30. doi: 10.5334/ijic.5682. eCollection 2021 Oct-Dec.
2
Person-centred care in the Dutch primary care setting: Refinement of middle-range theory by patients and professionals.荷兰初级保健环境中的以人为主的关怀:患者和专业人员对中级理论的完善。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 9;18(3):e0282802. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282802. eCollection 2023.
3
Untangling the inter-relatedness within integrated care programmes for community-dwelling frail older people: a rapid realist review.梳理社区居家体弱老年人综合护理计划中的相互关联性:一项快速现实主义综述
BMJ Open. 2021 Apr 24;11(4):e043280. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043280.
4
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
5
An intervention to improve outcomes of falls in dementia: the DIFRID mixed-methods feasibility study.一项旨在改善痴呆症患者跌倒结局的干预措施:DIFRID 混合方法可行性研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Oct;23(59):1-208. doi: 10.3310/hta23590.
6
7
How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?“护理路径技术”对卒中护理服务整合的影响是如何衡量的,以及有哪些证据支持其在这方面的有效性?
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Mar;6(1):78-110. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2007.00098.x.
8
Relevant patient characteristics for estimating healthcare needs according to healthcare providers and people with type 2 diabetes: a Delphi survey.根据医疗保健提供者和 2 型糖尿病患者的特点,估算医疗保健需求的相关患者特征:一项德尔菲调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Aug 16;19(1):575. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4371-z.
9
Developing the principles of chair based exercise for older people: a modified Delphi study.制定针对老年人的椅上运动原则:一项改良德尔菲研究
BMC Geriatr. 2014 May 19;14:65. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-14-65.
10
Setting an International Research Agenda for Fear of Cancer Recurrence: An Online Delphi Consensus Study.为癌症复发恐惧设定国际研究议程:一项在线德尔菲共识研究。
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 22;12:596682. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.596682. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of Critical Health and Safety Risks in Homes where Hoarding is Prevalent.评估普遍存在囤积问题的家庭中的关键健康和安全风险。
J Community Health. 2024 Feb;49(1):8-16. doi: 10.1007/s10900-023-01238-0. Epub 2023 Jun 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Untangling the inter-relatedness within integrated care programmes for community-dwelling frail older people: a rapid realist review.梳理社区居家体弱老年人综合护理计划中的相互关联性:一项快速现实主义综述
BMJ Open. 2021 Apr 24;11(4):e043280. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043280.
2
Professional Care Networks of Frail Older People: An Explorative Survey Study from the Patient Perspective.体弱老年人的专业护理网络:一项从患者角度进行的探索性调查研究
Int J Integr Care. 2020 Apr 1;20(1):12. doi: 10.5334/ijic.4721.
3
Scenarios for the logistics services industry: A Delphi-based analysis for 2025.
物流服务行业的情景分析:基于德尔菲法对2025年的分析。
Int J Prod Econ. 2010 Sep;127(1):46-59. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.04.013. Epub 2010 May 1.
4
Towards a values framework for integrated health services: an international Delphi study.迈向整合卫生服务的价值观框架:一项国际德尔菲研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Mar 18;20(1):224. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-5008-y.
5
Actions required to implement integrated care for older people in the community using the World Health Organization's ICOPE approach: A global Delphi consensus study.实施世界卫生组织 ICOPE 方法的社区老年人综合护理所需的行动:全球德尔菲共识研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 11;13(10):e0205533. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205533. eCollection 2018.
6
The (cost-)effectiveness of preventive, integrated care for community-dwelling frail older people: A systematic review.针对社区居家体弱老年人的预防性综合护理的(成本)效益:一项系统综述。
Health Soc Care Community. 2019 Jan;27(1):1-30. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12571. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
7
Elements of integrated care approaches for older people: a review of reviews.老年人综合护理方法的要素:综述之综述
BMJ Open. 2018 Apr 7;8(4):e021194. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021194.
8
Social engagement and successful aging.社会参与与成功老龄化。
Eur J Ageing. 2005 Mar;2(1):64-66. doi: 10.1007/s10433-005-0020-y. Epub 2005 Mar 4.
9
Integrated care for older populations and its implementation facilitators and barriers: A rapid scoping review.老年人群的综合护理及其实施的促进因素和障碍:一项快速综述。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2017 Jun 1;29(3):327-334. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzx041.
10
Organizational Context and Capabilities for Integrating Care: A Framework for Improvement.整合医疗的组织背景与能力:改进框架
Int J Integr Care. 2016 Aug 31;16(3):15. doi: 10.5334/ijic.2416.