• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于既有数据和机器学习的心血管风险预测模型。

Pre-existing and machine learning-based models for cardiovascular risk prediction.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine and Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital, Changwon, Korea.

Cardiovascular Center, Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 82, Gumi-Ro 173 Beon-Gil, Bundang-Gu, Seongnam-si, 13620, Gyeonggi-Do, Korea.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 26;11(1):8886. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-88257-w.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-021-88257-w
PMID:33903629
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8076166/
Abstract

Predicting the risk of cardiovascular disease is the key to primary prevention. Machine learning has attracted attention in analyzing increasingly large, complex healthcare data. We assessed discrimination and calibration of pre-existing cardiovascular risk prediction models and developed machine learning-based prediction algorithms. This study included 222,998 Korean adults aged 40-79 years, naïve to lipid-lowering therapy, had no history of cardiovascular disease. Pre-existing models showed moderate to good discrimination in predicting future cardiovascular events (C-statistics 0.70-0.80). Pooled cohort equation (PCE) specifically showed C-statistics of 0.738. Among other machine learning models such as logistic regression, treebag, random forest, and adaboost, the neural network model showed the greatest C-statistic (0.751), which was significantly higher than that for PCE. It also showed improved agreement between the predicted risk and observed outcomes (Hosmer-Lemeshow χ = 86.1, P < 0.001) than PCE for whites did (Hosmer-Lemeshow χ = 171.1, P < 0.001). Similar improvements were observed for Framingham risk score, systematic coronary risk evaluation, and QRISK3. This study demonstrated that machine learning-based algorithms could improve performance in cardiovascular risk prediction over contemporary cardiovascular risk models in statin-naïve healthy Korean adults without cardiovascular disease. The model can be easily adopted for risk assessment and clinical decision making.

摘要

预测心血管疾病的风险是一级预防的关键。机器学习在分析日益庞大、复杂的医疗保健数据方面引起了关注。我们评估了现有的心血管风险预测模型的区分度和校准度,并开发了基于机器学习的预测算法。本研究纳入了 222998 名年龄在 40-79 岁、初次接受降脂治疗、无心血管疾病史的韩国成年人。现有的模型在预测未来心血管事件方面表现出中等至良好的区分度(C 统计量为 0.70-0.80)。特定的队列方程(PCE)显示的 C 统计量为 0.738。在其他机器学习模型(如逻辑回归、树袋、随机森林和自适应增强)中,神经网络模型的 C 统计量最高(0.751),显著高于 PCE。它还显示出与观察结果之间的预测风险之间的一致性得到了改善(Hosmer-Lemeshow χ=86.1,P<0.001),而 PCE 对白人则没有(Hosmer-Lemeshow χ=171.1,P<0.001)。Framingham 风险评分、系统性冠状动脉风险评估和 QRISK3 也观察到了类似的改善。本研究表明,基于机器学习的算法可以提高他汀类药物初治无心血管疾病的韩国健康成年人的心血管风险预测的性能,优于当代心血管风险模型。该模型可方便地用于风险评估和临床决策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c025/8076166/00918974905f/41598_2021_88257_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c025/8076166/e442d6f32d71/41598_2021_88257_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c025/8076166/9fe7d40a9625/41598_2021_88257_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c025/8076166/ba7d7b5738dc/41598_2021_88257_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c025/8076166/00918974905f/41598_2021_88257_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c025/8076166/e442d6f32d71/41598_2021_88257_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c025/8076166/9fe7d40a9625/41598_2021_88257_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c025/8076166/ba7d7b5738dc/41598_2021_88257_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c025/8076166/00918974905f/41598_2021_88257_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Pre-existing and machine learning-based models for cardiovascular risk prediction.基于既有数据和机器学习的心血管风险预测模型。
Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 26;11(1):8886. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-88257-w.
2
Comparing the performance of machine learning and conventional models for predicting atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in a general Chinese population.比较机器学习模型和传统模型在预测一般中国人群中动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病方面的性能。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Jul 24;23(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02242-z.
3
Consistency of variety of machine learning and statistical models in predicting clinical risks of individual patients: longitudinal cohort study using cardiovascular disease as exemplar.多种机器学习和统计模型在预测个体患者临床风险方面的一致性:以心血管疾病为例的纵向队列研究
BMJ. 2020 Nov 4;371:m3919. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m3919.
4
5
Machine learning versus traditional risk stratification methods in acute coronary syndrome: a pooled randomized clinical trial analysis.机器学习与传统风险分层方法在急性冠状动脉综合征中的比较:一项汇总随机临床试验分析。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2020 Jan;49(1):1-9. doi: 10.1007/s11239-019-01940-8.
6
Predictive Accuracy of Stroke Risk Prediction Models Across Black and White Race, Sex, and Age Groups.不同种族、性别和年龄组的卒中风险预测模型的预测准确性。
JAMA. 2023 Jan 24;329(4):306-317. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.24683.
7
Machine learning methodologies versus cardiovascular risk scores, in predicting disease risk.机器学习方法与心血管风险评分在疾病风险预测中的比较。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Dec 29;18(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0644-1.
8
Cardiovascular Disease Risk Prediction in the HIV Outpatient Study.HIV门诊研究中的心血管疾病风险预测
Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Dec 1;63(11):1508-1516. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw615. Epub 2016 Sep 9.
9
External validation and clinical usefulness of three commonly used cardiovascular risk prediction scores in an Emirati population: a retrospective longitudinal cohort study.在阿联酋人群中对三种常用心血管风险预测评分进行外部验证和临床实用性评估:一项回顾性纵向队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 28;10(10):e040680. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040680.
10
Comparative performance of the two pooled cohort equations for predicting atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.两种列线图方程预测动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病的比较性能。
Atherosclerosis. 2021 Oct;334:23-29. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2021.08.034. Epub 2021 Aug 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Machine Learning-Based Analysis of Lifestyle Risk Factors for Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: Retrospective Case-Control Study.基于机器学习的动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病生活方式风险因素分析:回顾性病例对照研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2025 Aug 7;13:e74415. doi: 10.2196/74415.
2
Primary prevention cardiovascular disease risk prediction model for contemporary Chinese (1°P-CARDIAC): Model derivation and validation using a hybrid statistical and machine-learning approach.当代中国人群心血管疾病一级预防风险预测模型(1°P-CARDIAC):采用统计与机器学习混合方法的模型推导与验证
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 28;20(7):e0322419. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322419. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
"AI's gonna have an impact on everything in society, so it has to have an impact on public health": a fundamental qualitative descriptive study of the implications of artificial intelligence for public health.“人工智能将对社会中的一切产生影响,因此它必然会对公共卫生产生影响”:一项关于人工智能对公共卫生影响的基本定性描述性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jan 6;21(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-10030-x.
2
Second opinion needed: communicating uncertainty in medical machine learning.需要第二种观点:传达医学机器学习中的不确定性
NPJ Digit Med. 2021 Jan 5;4(1):4. doi: 10.1038/s41746-020-00367-3.
3
Statistical thinking, machine learning.
Enhanced cardiovascular risk prediction in the Western Pacific: A machine learning approach tailored to the Malaysian population.
西太平洋地区心血管疾病风险预测的增强:一种针对马来西亚人群的机器学习方法。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 17;20(6):e0323949. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323949. eCollection 2025.
4
Evaluating the sample size requirements of tree-based ensemble machine learning techniques for clinical risk prediction.评估基于树的集成机器学习技术在临床风险预测中的样本量要求。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2025 Jul;34(7):1356-1372. doi: 10.1177/09622802251338983. Epub 2025 May 14.
5
Prediction of major outcomes in patients with malignant hypertension using machine learning: A report from the West Birmingham malignant hypertension registry.使用机器学习预测恶性高血压患者的主要结局:西米德兰兹恶性高血压登记处的报告。
Eur J Clin Invest. 2025 Apr 18:e70052. doi: 10.1111/eci.70052.
6
Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk Prediction Models in China, Japan, and Korea: Implications for East Asians?中国、日本和韩国的动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病风险预测模型:对东亚人有何启示?
JACC Asia. 2025 Mar;5(3 Pt 1):333-349. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2025.01.006.
7
Machine learning based prediction models for cardiovascular disease risk using electronic health records data: systematic review and meta-analysis.基于机器学习利用电子健康记录数据预测心血管疾病风险的模型:系统评价与荟萃分析
Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2024 Oct 27;6(1):7-22. doi: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztae080. eCollection 2025 Jan.
8
A prediction study on the occurrence risk of heart disease in older hypertensive patients based on machine learning.基于机器学习的老年高血压患者心脏病发生风险预测研究
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Jan 11;25(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-05679-1.
9
The digital transformation of nursing practice: an analysis of advanced IoT technologies and smart nursing systems.护理实践的数字化转型:先进物联网技术与智能护理系统分析
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Nov 29;11:1471527. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1471527. eCollection 2024.
10
Optimized Clinical Feature Analysis for Improved Cardiovascular Disease Risk Screening.优化临床特征分析以改善心血管疾病风险筛查
IEEE Open J Eng Med Biol. 2024 Jan 29;5:816-827. doi: 10.1109/OJEMB.2023.3347479. eCollection 2024.
统计思维,机器学习。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Dec;116:136-137. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.08.003. Epub 2019 Aug 16.
4
Statistics versus machine learning: definitions are interesting (but understanding, methodology, and reporting are more important).统计学与机器学习:定义固然有趣(但理解、方法和报告更为重要)。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Dec;116:137-138. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.08.002. Epub 2019 Aug 16.
5
A systematic review shows no performance benefit of machine learning over logistic regression for clinical prediction models.系统评价显示,机器学习在临床预测模型中并未优于逻辑回归。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Jun;110:12-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.02.004. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
6
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2019 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.《2019年心脏病和中风统计数据更新:美国心脏协会报告》
Circulation. 2019 Mar 5;139(10):e56-e528. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000659.
7
A guide to deep learning in healthcare.深度学习在医疗保健中的应用指南。
Nat Med. 2019 Jan;25(1):24-29. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0316-z. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
8
Machine Learning Outperforms ACC / AHA CVD Risk Calculator in MESA.机器学习在 MESA 研究中优于 ACC/AHA CVD 风险计算器。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Nov 20;7(22):e009476. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.009476.
9
Equalization of four cardiovascular risk algorithms after systematic recalibration: individual-participant meta-analysis of 86 prospective studies.四项心血管风险算法经系统重新校准后的均衡:86 项前瞻性研究的个体参与者荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J. 2019 Feb 14;40(7):621-631. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy653.
10
Deep learning algorithms for detection of critical findings in head CT scans: a retrospective study.深度学习算法在头部 CT 扫描中关键发现检测的应用:一项回顾性研究。
Lancet. 2018 Dec 1;392(10162):2388-2396. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31645-3. Epub 2018 Oct 11.