Suppr超能文献

护理与助产教育中的合作生产:文献系统综述

Co-production in nursing and midwifery education: A systematic review of the literature.

作者信息

O'Connor Siobhan, Zhang Mengying, Trout Kimberly Kovach, Snibsoer Anne Kristin

机构信息

School of Health in Social Science, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA, United States.

出版信息

Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Jul;102:104900. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104900. Epub 2021 Apr 13.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Co-producing aspects of nursing and midwifery education is increasingly being used in higher education to try to improve student learning and meet standards set by some professional accreditation bodies. This review aims to identify and synthesise evidence on this pedagogical approach.

DESIGN

Systematic review.

DATA SOURCES

Searches were conducted in CINAHL, ERIC, MEDLINE, and PubMed.

REVIEW METHODS

Four bibliographical databases were searched using relevant search terms between 2009 and 2019. Titles, abstracts, and full text papers were screened. Pertinent data were extracted and critical appraisal undertaken. Data were analysed using the framework approach and findings presented in a narrative summary.

RESULTS

Twenty-three studies were included. Two overarching themes emerged. The first focused on the impact of co-production on nursing and midwifery students, service users, and carers which had five subthemes; 1) acquiring new knowledge and skills, 2) gaining confidence and awareness, 3) building better relationships, 4) feeling vulnerable, and 5) attaining a sense of pride or enjoyment. The second theme centred on factors affecting how co-production was delivered which had three subthemes; 1) human interactional approach, 2) pedagogic quality, and 3) organisational environment.

CONCLUSION

This review provides a comprehensive update of the literature on co-production in nursing and midwifery education. Tentative evidence exists that participatory approaches could improve learning and positively impact on nursing and midwifery students, service users, and carers. Educators should consider adopting co-production and including students, service users, carers, practice staff, and other relevant stakeholders in this pedagogical process. However, more rigorous research examining how effective co-production is in improving learning over traditional methods is warranted given the additional resources required to deliver it.

摘要

目标

护理与助产教育的共同生产方面越来越多地被用于高等教育,以试图提高学生的学习效果并达到一些专业认证机构设定的标准。本综述旨在识别并综合关于这种教学方法的证据。

设计

系统综述。

数据来源

在CINAHL、教育资源信息中心(ERIC)、医学期刊数据库(MEDLINE)和PubMed中进行检索。

综述方法

在2009年至2019年期间使用相关检索词对四个书目数据库进行检索。对标题、摘要和全文论文进行筛选。提取相关数据并进行批判性评价。使用框架方法对数据进行分析,并以叙述性总结的形式呈现研究结果。

结果

纳入了23项研究。出现了两个总体主题。第一个主题聚焦于共同生产对护理与助产专业学生、服务使用者和护理人员的影响,该主题有五个子主题;1)获取新知识和技能,2)获得信心和意识,3)建立更好的关系,4)感到脆弱,5)获得自豪感或愉悦感。第二个主题围绕影响共同生产实施方式的因素展开,该主题有三个子主题;1)人际互动方法,2)教学质量,3)组织环境。

结论

本综述全面更新了护理与助产教育中共同生产的文献。初步证据表明,参与式方法可以改善学习,并对护理与助产专业学生、服务使用者和护理人员产生积极影响。教育工作者应考虑采用共同生产,并让学生、服务使用者、护理人员、实践工作人员和其他相关利益相关者参与这一教学过程。然而,鉴于实施共同生产需要额外的资源,有必要进行更严格的研究,以检验其在提高学习效果方面相对于传统方法的有效性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验