• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

告知护理和助产学教育中技术增强学习的理论:系统评价和类型分类。

Theories informing technology enhanced learning in nursing and midwifery education: A systematic review and typological classification.

机构信息

Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.

Arthur Labatt Family School of Nursing, Western University, London, Canada.

出版信息

Nurse Educ Today. 2022 Nov;118:105518. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105518. Epub 2022 Aug 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105518
PMID:36030581
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Learning is a complex process involving internal cognitive processes and external stimuli from curricula, pedagogical strategies, and the learning environment. Theories are used extensively in higher education to understand the intricacies of adult learning and improve student outcomes. Nursing and midwifery education uses a range of technology enhanced learning (e-learning) approaches, some of which are underpinned by theoretical frameworks.

OBJECTIVE

Synthesise literature on theories that inform technology enhanced learning in nursing and midwifery education.

DESIGN

A systematic review.

DATA SOURCE

CINAHL, ERIC, MEDLINE and PubMed were searched for relevant studies (2000-2021). Reference lists of related literature reviews were hand searched.

REVIEW METHODS

Title and abstract, followed by full texts were screened by two reviewers independently using predefined eligibility criteria. Quality appraisal was not undertaken. Data were extracted and Merriam and Bierema's typology of adult learning theories used to categorise theories in each study.

RESULTS

Thirty-three studies were included, incorporating twenty-nine distinct learning theories from the behaviourist, cognitivist, constructivist, and social cognitivist domains, with constructivist being the most widely used. Kolb's Experiential Learning Theory and Driscoll's Constructivist Learning Theory were the most commonly reported theories. The population of learners were mainly undergraduate nursing students who used a range of online, mobile, blended or computerised learning, virtual reality, or digital forms of simulation, primarily in university settings. Theories were employed to inform the technology enhanced learning intervention or to help explain how these could improve student learning.

CONCLUSION

This review highlighted a range of theories, particularly constructivist approaches, that underpin research on technology enhanced learning in nursing education, by informing or explaining how these digital interventions support learning. More rigorous research that examines the myriad of theoretical frameworks and their effectiveness in informing and explaining technology enhanced learning is needed to justify this approach to pedagogical nursing research and practice.

摘要

背景

学习是一个复杂的过程,涉及内部认知过程和课程、教学策略以及学习环境的外部刺激。理论在高等教育中被广泛用于理解成人学习的复杂性并提高学生的学习成果。护理和助产学教育使用了一系列技术增强学习(e-learning)方法,其中一些方法是基于理论框架的。

目的

综合护理和助产学教育中关于技术增强学习的理论文献。

设计

系统综述。

资料来源

CINAHL、ERIC、MEDLINE 和 PubMed 检索了相关研究(2000-2021 年)。手动检索了相关文献综述的参考文献列表。

审查方法

两位审查员独立使用预定义的纳入标准筛选标题和摘要,然后筛选全文。未进行质量评估。提取数据,并使用 Merriam 和 Bierema 的成人学习理论分类法对每项研究中的理论进行分类。

结果

共纳入 33 项研究,纳入了来自行为主义、认知主义、建构主义和社会认知主义领域的 29 种不同的学习理论,其中建构主义理论的应用最为广泛。Kolb 的体验式学习理论和 Driscoll 的建构主义学习理论是报告最多的理论。学习者的人群主要是本科护理学生,他们使用了各种在线、移动、混合或计算机化学习、虚拟现实或数字化模拟形式,主要在大学环境中使用。这些理论被用于为技术增强学习干预提供信息,或帮助解释这些干预如何提高学生的学习效果。

结论

本综述强调了一系列理论,特别是建构主义方法,这些理论为护理教育中关于技术增强学习的研究提供了基础,通过为这些数字干预措施如何支持学习提供信息或解释。需要更严格的研究来检验众多理论框架及其在为技术增强学习提供信息和解释方面的有效性,以证明这种方法对教学护理研究和实践是合理的。

相似文献

1
Theories informing technology enhanced learning in nursing and midwifery education: A systematic review and typological classification.告知护理和助产学教育中技术增强学习的理论:系统评价和类型分类。
Nurse Educ Today. 2022 Nov;118:105518. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105518. Epub 2022 Aug 18.
2
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
3
Co-production in nursing and midwifery education: A systematic review of the literature.护理与助产教育中的合作生产:文献系统综述
Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Jul;102:104900. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104900. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
4
Effect of an Extended Reality Simulation Intervention on Midwifery Students' Anxiety: Systematic Review.扩展现实模拟干预对助产专业学生焦虑情绪的影响:系统评价
JMIR Nurs. 2025 Jun 18;8:e68984. doi: 10.2196/68984.
5
Factors that influence parents' and informal caregivers' views and practices regarding routine childhood vaccination: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响父母和非正式照顾者对常规儿童疫苗接种看法和做法的因素:定性证据综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 27;10(10):CD013265. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013265.pub2.
6
Interventions for promoting habitual exercise in people living with and beyond cancer.促进癌症患者及康复者进行习惯性锻炼的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 19;9(9):CD010192. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010192.pub3.
7
Team based learning in nursing and midwifery higher education; a systematic review of the evidence for change.护理与助产高等教育中的团队式学习;对变革证据的系统评价
Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Jan;60:75-83. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.09.012. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
8
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.
9
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
10
Theories Informing eHealth Implementation: Systematic Review and Typology Classification.理论指导电子健康实施:系统评价和分类学分类。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 May 31;23(5):e18500. doi: 10.2196/18500.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of a MOOC-Based Blended Learning Model on Performance, Satisfaction, and Perceptions in a Histology Course for Chinese Medical Students.基于慕课的混合学习模式对中国医学生组织学课程成绩、满意度及认知的影响
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2025 Aug 22;16:1501-1510. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S534676. eCollection 2025.
2
A Large-Scale Multispecialty Evaluation of Web-Based Simulation in Medical Microbiology Laboratory Education: Randomized Controlled Trial.医学微生物学实验室教育中基于网络模拟的大规模多专业评估:随机对照试验
JMIR Med Educ. 2025 Jul 30;11:e72495. doi: 10.2196/72495.
3
Identifying Research Priorities in Digital Education for Health Care: Umbrella Review and Modified Delphi Method Study.
确定医疗保健数字教育中的研究重点:综合回顾与改良德尔菲法研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Feb 19;27:e66157. doi: 10.2196/66157.
4
Usefulness of pedagogical design features of a digital educational resource into nursing home placement: a qualitative study of nurse educators' experiences.数字教育资源的教学设计特征在养老院安置中的效用:一项关于护士教育工作者经验的定性研究。
BMC Nurs. 2024 Feb 21;23(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-01776-5.
5
Exploring stakeholders' experiences in co-creation initiatives for clinical nursing education: a qualitative study.探索利益相关者在临床护理教育共创举措中的经历:一项定性研究。
BMC Nurs. 2023 Nov 6;22(1):416. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01582-5.
6
Nurse educators' suggestions for a digital educational resource suitable for undergraduate student nurses' placement studies: Qualitative empirical research.护士教育者对适合本科护生实习研究的数字化教育资源的建议:定性实证研究。
Nurs Open. 2023 Aug;10(8):5433-5445. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1782. Epub 2023 May 4.
7
Using web log analysis to evaluate healthcare students' engagement behaviours with multimedia lectures on YouTube.利用网络日志分析评估医学生对 YouTube 上多媒体讲座的参与行为。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 14;18(4):e0284133. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284133. eCollection 2023.