Key Laboratory of Digital Earth Science, Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.
Department of Geography, University of Connecticut, Storrs CT06269, USA.
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Aug 25;784:147140. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147140. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
Understanding the basin-scale hydrology and the spatiotemporal distribution of regional precipitation requires high precision, as well as high-resolution precipitation data. We have made an attempt to develop an Integrated Downscaling and Calibration (IDAC) framework to generate high-resolution (1 km × 1 km) gridded precipitation data. Traditionally, GWR (Geographical weighted regression) model has widely been applied to generate high-resolution precipitation data for regional scales. The GWR model generally assumes a spatially varied relationships between precipitation and its associated environmental variables, however, the relationships need to remain constant (fixed) for some variables over space. In this study, a Mixed Geographically Weighted Regression (MGWR) model, capable of dealing with the fixed and spatially varied environmental variables, is proposed to downscale the Original-TRMM precipitation data from a coarse resolution (0.25 × 0.25) to a high-resolution (1 km × 1 km) for the period of 2000-2018 over the Upper Indus Basin (UIB). Additionally, accuracy of the downscaled precipitation data was further improved by merging it with the recorded data from rain gauge stations (RGS) using two calibration approaches such as Geographical Ratio Analysis (GRA) and Geographical Difference Analysis (GDA). We found MGWR to perform better given its higher R and lower RMSE and bias values (R = 0.96; RMSE = 56.01 mm, bias = 0.014) in comparison to the GWR model (R = 0.95; RMSE = 60.76 mm, bias = 0.094). It was observed that the GDA and GRA calibrated-downscaled precipitation datasets were superior to the Original-TRMM, yet GRA outperformed GDA. Annual precipitation from downscaled and calibrated-downscaled datasets was further temporally downscaled to obtain high-resolution monthly and daily precipitations. The results revealed that the monthly-downscaled precipitation (R = 0.82, bias = -0.02 and RMSE = 11.93 mm/month) and the calibrated-downscaled (R = 0.89, bias = -0.006 and RMSE = 9.19 mm/month) series outperformed the Original-TRMM (R = 0.72, bias = 0.14 and RMSE = 19.8 mm/month) as compared to the RGS observations. The results of daily calibrated-downscaled precipitation (R = 0.79, bias = 0.001 and RMSE = 1.7 mm/day) were better than the Original-TRMM (R = 0.64, bias = - 0.12 and RMSE = 6.82 mm/day). In general, the proposed IDAC approach is suitable for retrieving high spatial resolution gridded data for annual, monthly, and daily time scales over the UIB with varying climate and complex topography.
了解流域尺度的水文和区域降水的时空分布需要高精度和高分辨率的降水数据。我们尝试开发了一种综合降尺度和校准(IDAC)框架,以生成高分辨率(1km×1km)的网格化降水数据。传统上,地理加权回归(GWR)模型已广泛用于生成区域尺度的高分辨率降水数据。GWR 模型通常假设降水与其相关环境变量之间存在空间变化的关系,但某些变量在空间上需要保持关系不变(固定)。在这项研究中,提出了一种混合地理加权回归(MGWR)模型,能够处理固定和空间变化的环境变量,用于将原始-TRMM 降水数据从粗分辨率(0.25×0.25)降尺度到 2000-2018 年期间上印度河流域(UIB)的高分辨率(1km×1km)。此外,通过使用地理比率分析(GRA)和地理差异分析(GDA)两种校准方法将其与雨量站(RGS)记录数据合并,进一步提高了降尺度降水数据的准确性。我们发现,与 GWR 模型相比,MGWR 的表现更好,因为它的 R 值更高,RMSE 和偏差值更低(R=0.96;RMSE=56.01mm,偏差=0.014)。与原始-TRMM 相比,观察到 GDA 和 GRA 校准降尺度的降水数据集优于原始-TRMM,但 GRA 优于 GDA。降尺度和校准降尺度的年降水量进一步时间降尺度以获得高分辨率的月和日降水量。结果表明,与 RGS 观测相比,月降尺度降水(R=0.82,偏差=-0.02,RMSE=11.93mm/月)和校准降尺度(R=0.89,偏差=-0.006,RMSE=9.19mm/月)系列优于原始-TRMM(R=0.72,偏差=0.14,RMSE=19.8mm/月)。日校准降尺度降水(R=0.79,偏差=0.001,RMSE=1.7mm/天)的结果优于原始-TRMM(R=0.64,偏差=-0.12,RMSE=6.82mm/天)。总的来说,所提出的 IDAC 方法适用于在气候和地形复杂的 UIB 上检索年、月和日时间尺度的高空间分辨率网格化数据。