Federal University of Paraná (UFPR); CEPETI, Center for Study and Research in Intensive Care Medicine, Rua Monte Castelo, 366, Curitiba, CEP, 82590-300, Brazil.
CEPETI, Center for Study and Research in Intensive Care Medicine, Rua Monte Castelo, 366, Curitiba, CEP: 82590-300, Brazil.
Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 27;11(1):9023. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-88509-9.
Despite several studies designed to evaluate the efficacy of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine in the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), there is still doubt about the effects of these drugs, especially in patients with severe forms of the disease. This randomized, open-label, controlled, phase III trial assessed the efficacy of chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine for five days in combination with standard care compared to standard care alone in patients hospitalized with severe COVID-19. Chloroquine 450 mg BID on day 1 and 450 mg once daily from days 2 to 5 or hydroxychloroquine 400 mg BID on day 1 and 400 mg once daily from days 2 to 5 were administered in the intervention group. Patients were enrolled from April 16 to August 06, 2020, in 6 hospitals in southern Brazil. The primary outcome was the clinical status measured on day 14 after randomization with a 9-point ordinal scale. The main secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality; invasive mechanical ventilation use; the incidence of acute renal dysfunction in 28 days; and the clinical status of patients on days 5, 7, 10 and 28. All patients with a positive RT-PCR result for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) were analyzed (modified intention to treat (mITT) population). Arrythmias and cardiovascular complications were assessed as safety outcomes. A total of 105 patients were enrolled and followed for 28 days. The trial was stopped before reaching the planned sample size due to harmful effects. Patients in the intervention group had a worse clinical outcome on the 14th day (odds ratio (OR) 2.45 [1.17 to 4.93], p = 0.016) and on the 28th day (OR 2.47 [1.15 to 5.30], p = 0.020). Moreover, the intervention group had higher incidences of invasive mechanical ventilation use (risk ratio (RR) 2.15 [1.05 to 4.40], p = 0.030) and severe renal dysfunction (KDIGO stage 3) (RR 2.24 [1.01 to 4.99], p = 0.042) until the 28th day of follow-up. No significant arrythmia was noted. In patients with severe COVID-19, the use of chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine added to standard treatment resulted in a significant worsening of clinical status, an increased risk of renal dysfunction and an increased need for invasive mechanical ventilation.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04420247. Registered 09 June 2020-Retrospectively registered, https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT04420247 .
尽管有几项研究旨在评估氯喹和羟氯喹在治疗 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)方面的疗效,但人们对这些药物的疗效仍存在疑问,尤其是在患有严重疾病的患者中。这项随机、开放标签、对照、III 期临床试验评估了氯喹或羟氯喹联合标准治疗与单纯标准治疗在住院的严重 COVID-19 患者中的疗效,联合治疗持续 5 天。干预组给予氯喹 450mg,bid,第 1 天;羟氯喹 400mg,bid,第 1 天;第 2 天至第 5 天,每天 1 次。患者于 2020 年 4 月 16 日至 8 月 6 日在巴西南部的 6 家医院入组。主要终点是在随机分组后第 14 天用 9 分序贯量表评估的临床状态。主要次要结局包括全因死亡率;有创机械通气的使用;28 天内急性肾功能不全的发生率;以及第 5、7、10 和 28 天的患者临床状态。所有严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)阳性的 RT-PCR 结果的患者均进行了分析(改良意向治疗(mITT)人群)。心律失常和心血管并发症被评估为安全性结局。共有 105 名患者入组并随访 28 天。由于不良影响,该试验在达到计划样本量之前提前停止。干预组患者第 14 天(优势比(OR)2.45 [1.17 至 4.93],p=0.016)和第 28 天(OR 2.47 [1.15 至 5.30],p=0.020)的临床结局更差。此外,干预组有创机械通气使用率(风险比(RR)2.15 [1.05 至 4.40],p=0.030)和严重肾功能不全(KDIGO 第 3 期)(RR 2.24 [1.01 至 4.99],p=0.042)的发生率更高,直到第 28 天随访。未发现明显的心律失常。在严重 COVID-19 患者中,氯喹/羟氯喹联合标准治疗显著恶化临床状态,肾功能不全风险增加,需要有创机械通气的风险增加。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT04420247。于 2020 年 6 月 9 日注册-回顾性注册,https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT04420247。