• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较低位直肠癌患者皮肤桥环式回肠造口术与传统环式回肠造口术的临床效果。

Comparison of the clinical outcomes of skin bridge loop ileostomy and traditional loop ileostomy in patients with low rectal cancer.

机构信息

Department of Colorectal Anal Surgery, Jingzhou Central Hospital, The Second Clinical Medical College, Yangtze University, No. 60 Jingzhong Road, Jingzhou, 434020, Hubei Province, China.

Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Jingzhou Central Hospital, The Second Clinical Medical College, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, 434020, Hubei Province, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 27;11(1):9101. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-88674-x.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-021-88674-x
PMID:33907300
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8079674/
Abstract

To compare the clinical results of patients with low rectal cancer who underwent skin bridge loop ileostomy and traditional loop ileostomy, and provide clinical evidence for choosing a better ostomy method. We retrospectively collected data of 118 patients with rectal cancer who underwent low anterior resection and loop ileostomy. To investigate the patients characteristics, postoperative stoma-related complications and the frequency of exchanged ostomy bags. The differences of these indicators between the two groups of patients who underwent skin bridge loop ileostomy and traditional loop ileostomy were compared. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score of the skin bridge loop ileostomy group was lower than that of the traditional ileostomy loop group (P < 0.05). The skin bridge group had a lower Discoloration, Erosion, Tissue overgrowth (DET) score and incidence of mucocutaneous separation than the traditional group at the 1st and 2nd weeks after operation (P < 0.05). The average number of weekly exchanged ostomy bags was significantly less in the skin bridge group than in the traditional group within 4 weeks after surgery (P < 0.05). Our experience demonstrates that the skin bridge loop ileostomy may significantly reduce early postoperative stoma-related complications, the frequency of exchanged ostomy bags and patients' medical costs after discharge.

摘要

为了比较行皮肤桥袢式回肠造口术和传统袢式回肠造口术的低位直肠癌患者的临床效果,为选择更好的造口方法提供临床依据。我们回顾性收集了 118 例行低位前切除术和回肠造口术的直肠癌患者的数据。调查患者的一般特征、术后造口相关并发症和更换造口袋的频率。比较两组行皮肤桥袢式回肠造口术和传统袢式回肠造口术患者的这些指标的差异。皮肤桥袢式回肠造口组的视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分低于传统回肠造口组(P<0.05)。皮肤桥组在术后第 1、2 周的变色、侵蚀、组织过度生长(DET)评分和黏膜分离发生率均低于传统组(P<0.05)。术后 4 周内,皮肤桥组每周更换造口袋的平均次数明显少于传统组(P<0.05)。我们的经验表明,皮肤桥袢式回肠造口术可显著减少术后早期与造口相关的并发症、更换造口袋的频率以及患者出院后的医疗费用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd58/8079674/4343a7d1c148/41598_2021_88674_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd58/8079674/18b3b1e43ff4/41598_2021_88674_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd58/8079674/12eb6bd8e2e3/41598_2021_88674_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd58/8079674/6103aa68fded/41598_2021_88674_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd58/8079674/4343a7d1c148/41598_2021_88674_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd58/8079674/18b3b1e43ff4/41598_2021_88674_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd58/8079674/12eb6bd8e2e3/41598_2021_88674_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd58/8079674/6103aa68fded/41598_2021_88674_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd58/8079674/4343a7d1c148/41598_2021_88674_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of the clinical outcomes of skin bridge loop ileostomy and traditional loop ileostomy in patients with low rectal cancer.比较低位直肠癌患者皮肤桥环式回肠造口术与传统环式回肠造口术的临床效果。
Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 27;11(1):9101. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-88674-x.
2
Evaluation of the early results of a loop stoma with a plastic rod in comparison to a loop stoma made with a skin bridge.与采用皮肤桥制作的袢式造口相比,评估带塑料棒的袢式造口的早期效果。
Pol Przegl Chir. 2015 Mar 1;87(1):31-4. doi: 10.1515/pjs-2015-0014.
3
Comparison of safety of loop ileostomy and loop transverse colostomy for low-lying rectal cancer patients undergoing anterior resection: A retrospective, single institute, propensity score-matched study.低位直肠癌患者前切除术回肠袢式造口术与横结肠袢式造口术安全性的比较:一项回顾性、单机构、倾向评分匹配研究。
J BUON. 2019 Jan-Feb;24(1):123-129.
4
Safety and Feasibility of Umbilical Diverting Loop Ileostomy for Patients with Rectal Tumor.直肠肿瘤患者行回肠袢式造口术的安全性和可行性。
World J Surg. 2017 Dec;41(12):3205-3211. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4128-y.
5
Loop ileostomy versus loop colostomy as temporary deviation after anterior resection for rectal cancer.直肠癌前切除术后临时性转流:袢式回肠造口术与袢式结肠造口术的比较
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2020 Dec;405(8):1147-1153. doi: 10.1007/s00423-020-01940-w. Epub 2020 Jul 23.
6
Comparison of safety of loop ileostomy and loop transverse colostomy for low-lying rectal cancer patients undergoing anterior resection: A retrospective, single institution, propensity score-matched study.低位直肠癌患者前切除术中行袢式回肠造口术与袢式横结肠造口术安全性的比较:一项回顾性、单机构、倾向评分匹配研究。
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2023 Apr;19(2):e5-e11. doi: 10.1111/ajco.13322. Epub 2020 Mar 21.
7
[Comparison of protective ileostomy and transverse colostomy through specimen extraction auxiliary incision following laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer].[腹腔镜直肠癌低位前切除术后经标本取出辅助切口行保护性回肠造口术与横结肠造口术的比较]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Oct 25;22(10):961-965. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0274.2019.10.011.
8
Risk factors for peristomal skin disorders associated with temporary ileostomy construction.与临时性回肠造口术相关的造口周围皮肤疾病的风险因素。
Surg Today. 2021 Jul;51(7):1152-1157. doi: 10.1007/s00595-020-02209-x. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
9
'Dumpling suture method' versus traditional suture method of protective loop ileostomy in laparoscopic anterior rectal resection with specimen extraction through stoma incision: a retrospective comparative cohort study.“饺子缝合法”与传统保护性套环回肠造口术在经肛门切口标本取出的腹腔镜前侧直肠切除术中的对比:一项回顾性对照队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2024 Mar 1;110(3):1367-1375. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000953.
10
Skin bridge loop stoma: outcome in 45 patients in comparison with stoma made on a plastic rod.皮肤桥环式造口:45 例患者的结果与塑料棒造口的比较。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2019 Dec;34(12):2195-2197. doi: 10.1007/s00384-019-03415-x. Epub 2019 Nov 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Machine learning prediction model of prolonged delay to loop ileostomy closure after rectal cancer surgery: a retrospective study.直肠癌手术后回肠造口关闭延迟的机器学习预测模型:一项回顾性研究。
World J Surg Oncol. 2025 May 14;23(1):185. doi: 10.1186/s12957-025-03843-w.
2
Is a bridge (rod) necessary for loop ileostomy? A phase II randomized control trial.回肠袢式造口术是否需要桥接(支撑棒)?一项II期随机对照试验。
Tech Coloproctol. 2025 Mar 25;29(1):87. doi: 10.1007/s10151-025-03132-4.
3
Effect of one-stitch method of temporary ileostomy on the surgical outcomes and complications after laparoscopic low anterior resection in rectal cancer patients: a propensity score matching analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Whether stoma support rods have application value in loop enterostomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.造口支撑棒在袢式肠造口术中是否有应用价值:系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Surg Oncol. 2020 Oct 22;18(1):269. doi: 10.1186/s12957-020-02029-w.
2
Does an Ileostomy Rod Prevent Stoma Retraction? A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.回肠造口杆是否可预防造口回缩?一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Wound Manag Prev. 2020 Jan;66(1):24-29.
3
Skin bridge loop stoma: outcome in 45 patients in comparison with stoma made on a plastic rod.
单缝合法临时回肠造口术对直肠癌患者腹腔镜低位前切除术后手术结局及并发症的影响:一项倾向评分匹配分析
Eur J Med Res. 2025 Mar 22;30(1):197. doi: 10.1186/s40001-025-02464-z.
4
Does one-stitch method of temporary ileostomy affect the stoma-related complications after laparoscopic low anterior resection in rectal cancer patients?单针法临时回肠造口术是否会影响直肠癌腹腔镜低位前切除术后的吻合口相关并发症?
Eur J Med Res. 2024 Aug 2;29(1):403. doi: 10.1186/s40001-024-01995-1.
5
Feasibility and safety of specimen extraction an enlarged (U-Plus) skin bridge loop ileostomy: a single-center retrospective comparative study.标本提取的可行性和安全性——扩大的(U型加)皮肤桥袢回肠造口术:一项单中心回顾性比较研究。
Front Oncol. 2023 Nov 8;13:1273499. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1273499. eCollection 2023.
6
Defunctioning Ileostomy to Prevent the Anastomotic Leakage in Colorectal Surgery. The State of the Art of the Different Available Types.功能性回肠造口术预防结直肠手术吻合口漏。不同可用类型的现状。
Front Surg. 2022 Apr 13;9:866191. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.866191. eCollection 2022.
皮肤桥环式造口:45 例患者的结果与塑料棒造口的比较。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2019 Dec;34(12):2195-2197. doi: 10.1007/s00384-019-03415-x. Epub 2019 Nov 16.
4
Protective Diversion Stoma in Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.直肠癌低位前切除术中的保护性转流造口:随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Visc Med. 2019 Jun;35(3):156-160. doi: 10.1159/000497168. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
5
Ostomy-Related Complications.造口相关并发症
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2019 May;32(3):176-182. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1676995. Epub 2019 Apr 2.
6
Stoma rods in abdominal surgery: a systematic review and metaanalyses.腹部手术中的造口杆:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Tech Coloproctol. 2019 Mar;23(3):201-206. doi: 10.1007/s10151-019-01935-w. Epub 2019 Feb 26.
7
Randomized clinical trial of intracutaneously versus transcutaneously sutured ileostomy to prevent stoma-related complications (ISI trial).随机对照临床试验:经皮与皮内缝合肠造口术预防造口相关并发症的比较(ISI 试验)。
Br J Surg. 2018 May;105(6):637-644. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10750. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
8
Preventive effect of diverting stoma on anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic low anterior resection with double stapling technique reconstruction applied based on risk stratification.基于风险分层应用双吻合器技术重建的腹腔镜低位前切除术后,转流造口对吻合口漏的预防作用。
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2018 Aug;11(3):220-226. doi: 10.1111/ases.12439. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
9
A Descriptive Study to Assess Quality of Life in Egyptian Patients With a Stoma.一项评估埃及造口患者生活质量的描述性研究。
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2017 Jul;63(7):28-33.
10
Intestinal Stomas-Postoperative Stoma Care and Peristomal Skin Complications.肠造口术——术后造口护理及造口周围皮肤并发症
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2017 Jul;30(3):184-192. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1598159. Epub 2017 May 22.