Spanish Agency of Medicines and Medical Devices (AEMPS), Madrid, Spain.
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2021 Nov;17(6):1274-1285. doi: 10.1002/ieam.4431. Epub 2021 May 13.
The environmental risk assessment (ERA) of veterinary medicinal products (VMPs) has been a regulatory requirement in the European Union (EU) since 1993. However, in the last few years, the potential impact of human and veterinary medicines on the environment has become a growing concern worldwide. Indeed, the legal requirements for VMPs in the EU are changing. Regulation (EU) 2019/6, which will be applied from January 28, 2022, aims to update the regulatory framework for VMPs and replaces Directive 2001/82/EC. This paper analyzes the ability of both legislations to ensure a high level of protection of the environment while authorizing VMPs. Consideration is also given to the impact on administrative burdens in both the legislations. We conclude that the Regulation improves the Directive by reducing to a certain extent the regulatory burdens for the applicants and authorities. However, the knowledge of the environmental risks of all authorized VMPs and the consistency of the assessments remain quite similar between both legislations. Nevertheless, the new Regulation proposes to examine the feasibility and applicability of an assessment system based on the critical review of properties of the active substances ("monographs") or other potential alternatives. With this in mind, two proposals (a basic and an enhanced approach) for developing a monograph system are presented and their main advantages and disadvantages are explored. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2021;17:1274-1285. © 2021 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC).
兽用药品的环境风险评估(ERA)自 1993 年以来一直是欧盟(EU)的监管要求。然而,在过去的几年中,人类和兽医药品对环境的潜在影响已成为全球日益关注的问题。事实上,欧盟对兽用药品的法律要求正在发生变化。将于 2022 年 1 月 28 日生效的法规(EU)2019/6 旨在更新兽用药品的监管框架,并取代指令 2001/82/EC。本文分析了这两项法规在授权兽用药品的同时确保高水平环境保护的能力。还考虑了这两项法规对行政负担的影响。我们的结论是,该法规通过在一定程度上减少申请人和主管部门的监管负担,从而改进了指令。然而,所有授权兽用药品的环境风险知识和评估的一致性在这两项法规之间仍然相当相似。尽管如此,新法规提议研究基于对活性物质(“专论”)或其他潜在替代品的特性进行关键审查的评估系统的可行性和适用性。有鉴于此,提出了两种开发专论系统的建议(基本方法和增强方法),并探讨了它们的主要优缺点。综合环境评估与管理 2021;17:1274-1285。© 2021 作者。综合环境评估与管理由 Wiley 期刊 LLC 代表环境毒理与化学学会(SETAC)出版。