Suppr超能文献

评价节细胞-内丛状层厚度在青光眼前期诊断中的作用,并与视网膜神经纤维层进行比较。

Evaluation of ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness in the diagnosis of preperimetric glaucoma and comparison to retinal nerve fiber layer.

机构信息

Department of Glaucoma, Sarakshi Netralaya, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.

Department of Retina, Sarakshi Netralaya, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.

出版信息

Indian J Ophthalmol. 2021 May;69(5):1113-1119. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_965_20.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic ability of optic nerve head (ONH), RNFL, and GC-IPL parameters in differentiating eyes with PPG from normals.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, cross-sectional, observational study. We studied 73 eyes of 41 patients and compared them to 65 eyes of 34 normal persons. Each patient underwent detailed ocular examination, standard automated perimetry, GC-IPL, ONH, and RNFL analysis. PPG was defined as eyes with normal visual field results and one or more localized RNFL defects that were associated with a glaucomatous disc appearance (e.g., notching or thinning of neuroretinal rim) and IOP more than 21 mm Hg. Diagnostic abilities of GC-IPL, ONH, and RNFL parameters were computed using area under receiver-operating curve (AUROC), sensitivity and specificity, and likelihood ratios (LRs).

RESULTS

All GC-IPL parameters differed significantly from normal. The ONH, RNFL, and GC-IPL parameters with best area under curves (AUCs) to differentiate PPG were vertical cup to disc ratio (0.76), inferior quadrant RNFL thickness (0.79), and inferotemporal quadrant GC-IPL thickness (0.73), respectively. Similarly, best LRs were found for clock hour 5, 6, and 12 thicknesses among RNFL; inferior sector and inferotemporal sector thicknesses among GC-IPL parameters.

CONCLUSION

Diagnostic abilities of GC-IPL parameters were comparable to RNFL parameters in differentiating PPG patients from normals. The likelihood of ruling in a disease was greater with GC-IPL parameters.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估视盘(ONH)、视网膜神经纤维层(RNFL)和神经节细胞-内丛状层(GC-IPL)参数在区分 PPG 眼与正常眼方面的诊断能力。

方法

这是一项回顾性、横断面、观察性研究。我们研究了 41 例患者的 73 只眼,并与 34 名正常人的 65 只眼进行了比较。每位患者均接受了详细的眼部检查、标准自动视野检查、GC-IPL、ONH 和 RNFL 分析。PPG 定义为视野正常结果且存在一处或多处局部性 RNFL 缺损的眼,这些缺损与青光眼性视盘外观(如神经视网膜边缘的切迹或变薄)和眼压超过 21mmHg 相关。使用接收器操作特征曲线(AUROC)下面积、敏感性和特异性以及似然比(LR)计算 GC-IPL、ONH 和 RNFL 参数的诊断能力。

结果

所有 GC-IPL 参数与正常眼均有显著差异。垂直杯盘比(0.76)、下象限 RNFL 厚度(0.79)和下颞象限 GC-IPL 厚度(0.73)是区分 PPG 的最佳 AUC 曲线下的 ONH、RNFL 和 GC-IPL 参数。同样,在 RNFL 中,时钟小时 5、6 和 12 的厚度;GC-IPL 参数中,下象限和下颞象限的厚度发现了最佳 LR。

结论

在区分 PPG 患者与正常眼方面,GC-IPL 参数的诊断能力与 RNFL 参数相当。GC-IPL 参数更有可能排除疾病。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2016/8186640/dafbd66beb62/IJO-69-1113-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验