Fernández Fernández Elena, Joyce Mary, O'Sullivan Andrew, MacLoughlin Ronan
Medical Affairs, Aerogen Limited, Galway Business Park, H91 HE94 Galway, Ireland.
Research and Development, Science and Emerging Technologies, Aerogen Limited, Galway Business Park, H91 HE94 Galway, Ireland.
Antibiotics (Basel). 2021 Apr 21;10(5):472. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10050472.
Lung disease is the main cause of morbidity and mortality in cystic fibrosis (CF). CF patients inhale antibiotics regularly as treatment against persistent bacterial infections. The goal of this study was to investigate the effect of clinical intervention on aerosol therapy during the escalation of care using a bench model of adult CF. Droplet size analysis of selected antibiotics was completed in tandem with the delivered aerosol dose (% of total dose) assessments in simulations of various interventions providing oxygen supplementation or ventilatory support. Results highlight the variability of aerosolised dose delivery. In the homecare setting, the vibrating mesh nebuliser (VMN) delivered significantly more than the jet nebuliser (JN) (16.15 ± 0.86% versus 6.51 ± 2.15%). In the hospital setting, using VMN only, significant variability was seen across clinical interventions. In the emergency department, VMN plus mouthpiece (no supplemental oxygen) was seen to deliver (29.02 ± 1.41%) versus low flow nasal therapy (10 L per minute (LPM) oxygen) (1.81 ± 0.47%) and high flow nasal therapy (50 LPM oxygen) (3.36 ± 0.34%). In the ward/intensive care unit, non-invasive ventilation recorded 19.02 ± 0.28%, versus 22.64 ± 1.88% of the dose delivered during invasive mechanical ventilation. These results will have application in the design of intervention-appropriate aerosol therapy strategies and will be of use to researchers developing new therapeutics for application in cystic fibrosis and beyond.
肺部疾病是囊性纤维化(CF)患者发病和死亡的主要原因。CF患者定期吸入抗生素以治疗持续性细菌感染。本研究的目的是使用成人CF的实验台模型,研究在护理升级期间临床干预对雾化治疗的影响。在模拟提供氧气补充或通气支持的各种干预措施时,对选定抗生素的液滴大小分析与输送的气溶胶剂量(占总剂量的百分比)评估同时完成。结果突出了雾化剂量输送的变异性。在家庭护理环境中,振动网式雾化器(VMN)输送的剂量明显高于喷射式雾化器(JN)(16.15±0.86%对6.51±2.15%)。在医院环境中,仅使用VMN时,不同临床干预措施之间存在显著差异。在急诊科,VMN加咬嘴(无补充氧气)输送的剂量为(29.02±1.41%),而低流量鼻导管吸氧治疗(每分钟10升(LPM)氧气)为(1.81±0.47%),高流量鼻导管吸氧治疗(每分钟50升氧气)为(3.36±0.34%)。在病房/重症监护病房,无创通气记录的剂量为19.02±0.28%,而有创机械通气期间输送的剂量为22.64±1.88%。这些结果将应用于设计适合干预措施的雾化治疗策略,并将有助于研究人员开发用于囊性纤维化及其他疾病的新疗法。