• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

研究实体学习空间中的协作动态:通过认识网络分析考虑时间视角。

Studying Collaboration Dynamics in Physical Learning Spaces: Considering the Temporal Perspective through Epistemic Network Analysis.

机构信息

Department for Information and Communication Technologies, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, 08018 Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2021 Apr 21;21(9):2898. doi: 10.3390/s21092898.

DOI:10.3390/s21092898
PMID:33919062
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8122647/
Abstract

The role of the learning space is especially relevant in the application of active pedagogies, for example those involving collaborative activities. However, there is limited evidence informing learning design on the potential effects of collaborative learning spaces. In particular, there is a lack of studies generating evidence derived from temporal analyses of the influence of learning spaces on the collaborative learning process. The temporal analysis perspective has been shown to be essential in the analysis of collaboration processes, as it reveals the relationships between students' actions. The aim of this study is to explore the potential of a temporal perspective to broaden understanding of the effects of table shape on collaboration when different group sizes and genders are considered. On-task actions such as explanation, discussion, non-verbal interaction, and interaction with physical artefacts were observed while students were engaged in engineering design tasks. Results suggest that table shape influences student behaviour when taking into account different group sizes and different genders.

摘要

学习空间的作用在应用主动教学法时尤为重要,例如那些涉及协作活动的教学法。然而,关于协作学习空间潜在影响的学习设计所依据的证据有限。特别是,缺乏从时间分析的角度研究学习空间对协作学习过程的影响的证据。时间分析视角已被证明对于协作过程的分析至关重要,因为它揭示了学生行为之间的关系。本研究旨在探索时间视角的潜力,以扩大对不同小组规模和性别考虑时桌子形状对协作影响的理解。在学生参与工程设计任务时,观察了诸如解释、讨论、非言语互动和与物理人工制品的互动等与任务相关的行为。结果表明,考虑到不同的小组规模和不同的性别,桌子形状会影响学生的行为。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2855/8122647/dbb9d835153f/sensors-21-02898-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2855/8122647/290a4248f5bd/sensors-21-02898-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2855/8122647/7a7b0671f022/sensors-21-02898-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2855/8122647/6bd46d0228c5/sensors-21-02898-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2855/8122647/02795b1c0b95/sensors-21-02898-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2855/8122647/27a52e8a8582/sensors-21-02898-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2855/8122647/c4f7760ba67e/sensors-21-02898-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2855/8122647/dbb9d835153f/sensors-21-02898-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2855/8122647/290a4248f5bd/sensors-21-02898-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2855/8122647/7a7b0671f022/sensors-21-02898-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2855/8122647/6bd46d0228c5/sensors-21-02898-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2855/8122647/02795b1c0b95/sensors-21-02898-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2855/8122647/27a52e8a8582/sensors-21-02898-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2855/8122647/c4f7760ba67e/sensors-21-02898-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2855/8122647/dbb9d835153f/sensors-21-02898-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Studying Collaboration Dynamics in Physical Learning Spaces: Considering the Temporal Perspective through Epistemic Network Analysis.研究实体学习空间中的协作动态:通过认识网络分析考虑时间视角。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Apr 21;21(9):2898. doi: 10.3390/s21092898.
2
How the study of online collaborative learning can guide teachers and predict students' performance in a medical course.在线协作学习研究如何指导教师并预测医学课程中学生的表现。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Feb 6;18(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1126-1.
3
Flexible learning spaces facilitate interaction, collaboration and behavioural engagement in secondary school.灵活的学习空间促进了中学的互动、合作和行为参与。
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 4;14(10):e0223607. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223607. eCollection 2019.
4
Epistemic Network Analyses of Economics Students' Graph Understanding: An Eye-Tracking Study.经济专业学生图形理解的认知网络分析:一项眼动研究。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Dec 3;20(23):6908. doi: 10.3390/s20236908.
5
Collaborative learning in gerontological clinical settings: The students' perspective.老年病学临床环境中的协作学习:学生的视角。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2016 Mar;17:229-34. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2016.02.006. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
6
Effect of Collaborative Group Testing on Dental Students' Performance and Perceived Learning in an Introductory Comprehensive Care Course.协作小组测试对牙科学生在综合护理入门课程中的表现及感知学习的影响。
J Dent Educ. 2019 Jan;83(1):88-93. doi: 10.21815/JDE.019.011.
7
Learning in friendship groups: developing students' conceptual understanding through social interaction.在友谊小组中学习:通过社交互动培养学生的概念理解。
Front Psychol. 2014 Sep 25;5:1031. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01031. eCollection 2014.
8
What did first-year students experience during their interprofessional education? A qualitative analysis of e-portfolios.一年级学生在跨专业教育期间有哪些经历?对电子档案袋的定性分析。
J Interprof Care. 2018 May;32(3):358-366. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2018.1427051. Epub 2018 Jan 24.
9
Differential impact of student behaviours on group interaction and collaborative learning: medical students' and tutors' perspectives.学生行为对小组互动和协作学习的不同影响:医学生和导师的观点
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Aug 22;16(1):217. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0730-1.
10
Are nursing students engaged in learning? A secondary analysis of data from the National Survey of Student Engagement.护理专业学生是否积极参与学习?对全国学生参与度调查数据的二次分析。
Nurs Educ Perspect. 2011 Mar-Apr;32(2):89-94. doi: 10.5480/1536-5026-32.2.89.

引用本文的文献

1
From Sensor Data to Educational Insights.从传感器数据到教育洞察。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Nov 7;22(21):8556. doi: 10.3390/s22218556.

本文引用的文献

1
Look together: analyzing gaze coordination with epistemic network analysis.共同注视:运用认知网络分析来分析注视协调
Front Psychol. 2015 Jul 21;6:1016. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01016. eCollection 2015.
2
Are two heads better than one? Comparing dyad and self-regulated learning in simulation training.两个脑袋总比一个好?模拟训练中对偶学习与自我调节学习的比较。
Med Educ. 2013 Dec;47(12):1215-22. doi: 10.1111/medu.12284.
3
Gender differences in older adults' everyday cognitive collaboration.老年人日常认知协作中的性别差异。
Int J Behav Dev. 2002 Jan;26(1):45-59. doi: 10.1080/01650250143000319.
4
Enhancing motor learning through dyad practice: contributions of observation and dialogue.通过二元组练习增强运动学习:观察与对话的作用
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2007 Jun;78(3):197-203. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2007.10599417.
5
Discovering hidden time patterns in behavior: T-patterns and their detection.发现行为中隐藏的时间模式:T 模式及其检测。
Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2000 Feb;32(1):93-110. doi: 10.3758/bf03200792.