• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

原代人牙龈成纤维细胞暴露于各种类型的可注射收敛性收缩剂后诱导的生物学反应。

Biological Response Induced in Primary Human Gingival Fibroblasts upon Exposure to Various Types of Injectable Astringent Retraction Agents.

作者信息

Nowakowska Danuta, Kulbacka Julita, Wezgowiec Joanna, Szewczyk Anna, Baczynska Dagmara, Zietek Marek, Wieckiewicz Wlodzimierz, Saczko Jolanta

机构信息

Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-425 Wroclaw, Poland.

Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland.

出版信息

Materials (Basel). 2021 Apr 20;14(8):2081. doi: 10.3390/ma14082081.

DOI:10.3390/ma14082081
PMID:33924145
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8074361/
Abstract

Traditional chemo-mechanical retraction/displacement materials can impact the gingival margin tissues. This study was undertaken to analyze biological responses induced in human gingival fibroblasts (HGFs) upon application of injectable astringent-based agents used in the cordless retraction technique. HGFs were exposed to hemostatic agents (five gels, three pastes, and one foam) based on aluminium chloride, aluminium sulphate and ferric sulphate. Changes in cell viability and proliferation were evaluated using an MTT assay and a BrdU assay. The cytoskeleton structure organization (zyxin and F-actin) was visualized by confocal laser scanning microscopy. Oxidative stress was determined using the Griess Reagent System. The RNA expression levels of antioxidant enzymes were quantified by real-time RT-PCR. The statistical significance was evaluated using Student's t-test and one-way ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey HSD test. The evaluated agents did not downregulate fibroblast viability or proliferation. No significant cytoskeleton reorganization was observed. Only one agent (Expasyl) induced oxidative stress, demonstrated by the increased level of nitrites. Incubation with the studied agents significantly increased the RNA expression of some antioxidant enzymes (SOD1, SOD3, GPX1). However, no significant influence on the expression of SOD2 and HMOX1 was detected. The injectable forms of chemical retraction agents revealed biocompatibility with HGFs, suggesting their potential clinical usefulness in gingival margin retraction.

摘要

传统的化学机械性收缩/移位材料会影响牙龈边缘组织。本研究旨在分析在无绳收缩技术中使用的可注射收敛剂类制剂作用于人类牙龈成纤维细胞(HGFs)时所诱导的生物学反应。将HGFs暴露于基于氯化铝、硫酸铝和硫酸铁的止血剂(五种凝胶、三种糊剂和一种泡沫剂)中。使用MTT法和BrdU法评估细胞活力和增殖的变化。通过共聚焦激光扫描显微镜观察细胞骨架结构组织(桩蛋白和F-肌动蛋白)。使用格里斯试剂系统测定氧化应激。通过实时RT-PCR定量抗氧化酶的RNA表达水平。使用学生t检验和带有事后Tukey HSD检验的单因素方差分析评估统计学意义。所评估的制剂并未下调成纤维细胞的活力或增殖。未观察到明显的细胞骨架重组。只有一种制剂(Expasyl)诱导了氧化应激,表现为亚硝酸盐水平升高。与所研究的制剂孵育显著增加了一些抗氧化酶(SOD1、SOD3、GPX1)的RNA表达。然而,未检测到对SOD2和HMOX1表达的显著影响。化学收缩剂的可注射形式显示出与HGFs的生物相容性,表明它们在牙龈边缘收缩中具有潜在的临床应用价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45b5/8074361/58c2770b9e79/materials-14-02081-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45b5/8074361/76089b7dbf0e/materials-14-02081-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45b5/8074361/4ec2c47e301b/materials-14-02081-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45b5/8074361/9f843ee470e3/materials-14-02081-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45b5/8074361/4e9250e064f1/materials-14-02081-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45b5/8074361/58c2770b9e79/materials-14-02081-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45b5/8074361/76089b7dbf0e/materials-14-02081-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45b5/8074361/4ec2c47e301b/materials-14-02081-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45b5/8074361/9f843ee470e3/materials-14-02081-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45b5/8074361/4e9250e064f1/materials-14-02081-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45b5/8074361/58c2770b9e79/materials-14-02081-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Biological Response Induced in Primary Human Gingival Fibroblasts upon Exposure to Various Types of Injectable Astringent Retraction Agents.原代人牙龈成纤维细胞暴露于各种类型的可注射收敛性收缩剂后诱导的生物学反应。
Materials (Basel). 2021 Apr 20;14(8):2081. doi: 10.3390/ma14082081.
2
effects of vasoconstrictive retraction agents on primary human gingival fibroblasts.血管收缩性回缩剂对原代人牙龈成纤维细胞的影响
Exp Ther Med. 2020 Mar;19(3):2037-2044. doi: 10.3892/etm.2020.8462. Epub 2020 Jan 20.
3
The influence of retraction agents on cytoskeleton reorganization and oxidative stress in primary human gingival fibroblasts (HGFs).收缩剂对原代人牙龈成纤维细胞(HGFs)细胞骨架重组和氧化应激的影响。
Arch Oral Biol. 2014 Mar;59(3):341-8. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2013.12.011. Epub 2014 Jan 8.
4
Dynamic oxidoreductive potential of astringent retraction agents.收敛性收缩剂的动态氧化还原电位
Folia Biol (Praha). 2010;56(6):263-8.
5
Cytotoxic potential of vasoconstrictor experimental gingival retraction agents: in vitro study on primary human gingival fibroblasts.血管收缩剂类实验性牙龈退缩剂的细胞毒性潜力:对原代人牙龈成纤维细胞的体外研究
Folia Biol (Praha). 2012;58(1):37-43.
6
The Influence of Hemostatic Agents and Cordless Gingival Retraction Materials on Smear Layer: An Ex vivo Scanning Electron Microscope Analysis.止血剂和无绳牙龈退缩材料对玷污层的影响:一项体外扫描电子显微镜分析
Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2021 Jul-Sep;11(3):143-147. doi: 10.4103/ijabmr.IJABMR_324_20. Epub 2021 Jul 19.
7
Cytotoxic effects of gingival retraction cords on human gingival fibroblasts in vitro.牙龈收缩线对体外培养的人牙龈成纤维细胞的细胞毒性作用。
J Oral Rehabil. 2004 Apr;31(4):368-72. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2003.01237.x.
8
Comparison of pressure generated by cordless gingival displacement materials.无线牙龈置换材料产生的压力比较。
J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Aug;112(2):163-7. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.09.035. Epub 2014 Feb 14.
9
The Direct Cytotoxic Effects of Different Hemostatic Agents on Human Gingival Fibroblasts.不同止血剂对人牙龈成纤维细胞的直接细胞毒性作用。
J Prosthodont. 2019 Apr;28(4):e896-e901. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12744. Epub 2018 Jan 11.
10
Comparative Evaluation of the Amount of Gingival Displacement Using Three Recent Gingival Retraction Systems - Study.使用三种新型牙龈退缩系统对牙龈移位量的比较评估——研究
Contemp Clin Dent. 2020 Jan-Mar;11(1):28-33. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_311_19. Epub 2020 Jul 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of Oral Microemulsion Spray Containing Pentacyclic Triterpenes-Rich (L.) Urb. Extract for Healing Mouth Ulcers.含富含五环三萜的(L.)乌尔提取物的口腔微乳喷雾用于治疗口腔溃疡的研发。
Pharmaceutics. 2022 Nov 20;14(11):2531. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14112531.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessment of cytotoxic and antimicrobial activity of selected gingival haemostatic agents - in vitro study.评价选定牙龈止血剂的细胞毒性和抗菌活性-体外研究。
Acta Bioeng Biomech. 2020;22(3):185-198.
2
Comparative Evaluation of the Amount of Gingival Displacement Using Three Recent Gingival Retraction Systems - Study.使用三种新型牙龈退缩系统对牙龈移位量的比较评估——研究
Contemp Clin Dent. 2020 Jan-Mar;11(1):28-33. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_311_19. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
3
Are Denture Adhesives Safe for Oral Cells?义齿黏合剂对口腔细胞安全吗?
J Prosthodont. 2021 Jan;30(1):65-70. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13226. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
4
A Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of Gingival Retraction Using Polyvinyl Siloxane Foam Retraction System, Vinyl Polysiloxane Paste Retraction System, and Copper Wire Reinforced Retraction Cord in Endodontically Treated Teeth: An Study.聚硅氧烷泡沫收缩系统、乙烯基聚硅氧烷糊剂收缩系统和铜丝增强收缩线在根管治疗牙齿中牙龈收缩效果的比较评估:一项研究。
Contemp Clin Dent. 2019 Jul-Sep;10(3):428-432. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_708_18.
5
Bleeding Index and Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein 1 as Gingival Inflammation Parameters after Chemical-Mechanical Retraction Procedure.化学机械龈退缩术后牙龈炎症参数:出血指数和单核细胞趋化蛋白 1。
Med Princ Pract. 2020;29(5):492-498. doi: 10.1159/000506878. Epub 2020 Apr 2.
6
Insights into superoxide dismutase 3 in regulating biological and functional properties of mesenchymal stem cells.超氧化物歧化酶3对间充质干细胞生物学和功能特性调控的研究进展
Cell Biosci. 2020 Feb 27;10:22. doi: 10.1186/s13578-020-00386-3. eCollection 2020.
7
Cytotoxicity of Different Nano Composite Resins on Human Gingival and Periodontal Ligament Fibroblast Cell Lines: An In Vitro Study.不同纳米复合树脂对人牙龈和牙周膜成纤维细胞系的细胞毒性:一项体外研究
Biomedicines. 2020 Mar 1;8(3):48. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines8030048.
8
effects of vasoconstrictive retraction agents on primary human gingival fibroblasts.血管收缩性回缩剂对原代人牙龈成纤维细胞的影响
Exp Ther Med. 2020 Mar;19(3):2037-2044. doi: 10.3892/etm.2020.8462. Epub 2020 Jan 20.
9
Comparison of Gingival Retraction Materials Using a New Gingival Sulcus Model.使用新型牙龈沟模型比较牙龈退缩材料。
J Prosthodont. 2019 Aug;28(7):784-789. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13093. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
10
Influence of gingival retraction paste versus cord on periodontal health: a systematic review and meta-analysis.牙龈收缩膏与龈线对牙周健康的影响:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Quintessence Int. 2019;50(3):234-244. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a41976.