• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国全国范围内禁止家庭/替代献血后,机采血小板捐献增加。

The apheresis platelet donation was increased after a nationwide ban on family/replacement donation in China.

机构信息

Guangzhou Blood Center, 31 Lu Yuan Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.

Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute (CTSI), Michigan State University, 909 Wilson Road Suite B500, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2021 Apr 29;21(1):819. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10819-4.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-021-10819-4
PMID:33926409
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8082857/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A nationwide ban on family/replacement donation (FRD) went into effect on April 1, 2018 in China. To date, no reports relevant to the trend of plateletpheresis donations before and after a nationwide ban on FRD were found.

METHODS

We used two independent full samples, consisting of 135,851 and 82,129 plateletpheresis donors from Guangzhou and Chengdu between October 2012 and September 2019, respectively. A pseudo-panel data approach was applied by grouping three time-invariant covariates - gender, blood donation history, and birth year across 14 cross-sections (a 6-month interval each) to form a total of 24 cohort groups (14 × 24 = 336 cohorts, i.e., cells) with each having common covariates. The outcome was average apheresis platelet units per donor in each cell. We performed a two-piecewise linear mixed model with the cross-section (i.e., time) just right before the ban as a time breakpoint (i.e., 11th cross-section) to examine the trend of outcome with the adjustment of three time-invariant covariates. We removed the FRDs in each of the first 11 cross-sections to detect its possible influence on the trend.

RESULTS

The final model for the samples from Guangzhou presented a two-piecewise linear trend of the outcome over time with a horizontal line to the left of the breakpoint (β = 0.0111, p = 0.0976) and a significantly positive linear trend to the right (β = 0.0404, p < 0.0001). The male donors and the donors with plateletpheresis donation history had an increased baseline outcome and a significant outcome change over time after the ban. Such a two-piecewise linear trend pattern can be replicated using the samples from Chengdu with some minor variations. Removing the FRD before the ban can change the pattern.

CONCLUSION

The significant increase of the average apheresis platelet units per donor over time after the FRD ban may be related to the implement of the FRD ban and the improved donation behavior of male donors and/or donors with platelet donation history after the ban. Our findings may potentially motivate the policymakers in other countries where the FRD for plateletpheresis donation is still legitimate to phase out their FRD strategy and ultimately achieve 100% voluntary plateletpheresis donation.

摘要

背景

2018 年 4 月 1 日起,中国全面禁止家庭/替代供者捐献(FRD)。截至目前,尚未有关于全国范围内 FRD 禁令前后血小板单采捐献趋势的报告。

方法

我们使用了两个独立的全样本,分别由 2012 年 10 月至 2019 年 9 月间来自广州和成都的 135851 名和 82129 名血小板单采供者组成。通过将三个时间不变协变量(性别、献血史和出生年份)按 14 个时间区间(每个区间 6 个月)分组,形成总共 24 个队列组(14×24=336 个队列,即细胞),每个队列组具有共同的协变量。结果为每个细胞中每位供者的平均单采血小板单位数。我们采用两段线性混合模型,以禁令前的时间区间(即第 11 个时间区间)作为时间分割点,调整三个时间不变协变量,检查结果的趋势。我们在每个前 11 个时间区间去除 FRD,以检测其对趋势的可能影响。

结果

来自广州的样本的最终模型呈现出一个随时间的两段线性趋势,在分割点的左侧有一条水平线(β=0.0111,p=0.0976),右侧有一个显著的正线性趋势(β=0.0404,p<0.0001)。男性供者和有血小板单采捐献史的供者在禁令后基线结果增加,且随时间有显著的变化。这种两段线性趋势模式可以使用成都的样本复制,略有变化。在禁令前去除 FRD 可以改变模式。

结论

FRD 禁令后,每位供者的平均单采血小板单位数随时间显著增加,这可能与 FRD 禁令的实施以及禁令后男性供者和/或有血小板捐献史的供者的捐献行为改善有关。我们的发现可能会促使其他国家的决策者逐步淘汰他们的 FRD 策略,并最终实现 100%自愿的血小板单采捐献。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59f1/8082857/a9f70b9f2eec/12889_2021_10819_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59f1/8082857/6515b13f5e9f/12889_2021_10819_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59f1/8082857/a9f70b9f2eec/12889_2021_10819_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59f1/8082857/6515b13f5e9f/12889_2021_10819_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59f1/8082857/a9f70b9f2eec/12889_2021_10819_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The apheresis platelet donation was increased after a nationwide ban on family/replacement donation in China.中国全国范围内禁止家庭/替代献血后,机采血小板捐献增加。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Apr 29;21(1):819. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10819-4.
2
Frequent platelet donation is associated with lymphopenia and risk of infections: A nationwide cohort study.频繁捐献血小板与淋巴细胞减少症和感染风险相关:一项全国性队列研究。
Transfusion. 2021 Feb;61(2):464-473. doi: 10.1111/trf.16175. Epub 2020 Nov 13.
3
Recovery of Platelet Count among Apheresis Platelet Donors.单采血小板献血者血小板计数的恢复情况。
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Dec;10(12):EC01-EC04. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/21070.8997. Epub 2016 Dec 1.
4
Effect of Frequency of Platelet Apheresis on Coagulation Function in Donors: A Prospective Cohort Study.血小板单采频率对献血者凝血功能的影响:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus. 2019 Oct;35(4):736-741. doi: 10.1007/s12288-019-01130-9. Epub 2019 May 6.
5
Sustained decreases in platelet count associated with multiple, regular plateletpheresis donations.与多次定期血小板单采捐献相关的血小板计数持续下降。
Transfusion. 2001 Jun;41(6):756-61. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.2001.41060756.x.
6
Iron Store of Repeat Plasma and Platelet Apheresis Donors.重复进行血浆和血小板单采捐献者的铁储备情况
Clin Lab. 2021 Feb 1;67(2). doi: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2020.200506.
7
Plateletpheresis donation through donor awareness, motivation, and recruitment drives: A unique concept and experience from a tertiary care oncology centre in India.通过提高献血者意识、激发积极性和开展招募活动来进行血小板单采捐献:印度一家三级肿瘤护理中心的独特理念与经验。
Transfus Clin Biol. 2022 Feb;29(1):65-69. doi: 10.1016/j.tracli.2021.07.003. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
8
Plateletpheresis in 90- to 110-pound donors using the CS-3000 blood cell separator.使用CS-3000血细胞分离机对体重90至110磅的献血者进行血小板单采。
Transfusion. 1997 Jul;37(7):715-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1997.37797369447.x.
9
Feasibility of applying the 2day deferral for repeat plateletpheresis: Indian perspective.重复血小板单采应用2天延迟期的可行性:印度视角
Transfus Apher Sci. 2013 Jun;48(3):341-3. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2013.04.013. Epub 2013 May 1.
10
Generation of reticulated platelets in response to whole blood donation or plateletpheresis.因全血捐献或血小板单采术而产生的网织血小板。
Transfusion. 2001 Oct;41(10):1234-40. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.2001.41101234.x.

本文引用的文献

1
Return rate in blood donors: A 7-year follow up.献血者的返还率:7 年随访。
Transfus Med. 2020 Apr;30(2):141-147. doi: 10.1111/tme.12647. Epub 2019 Nov 28.
2
Current approaches to increase blood donations in resource-limited countries.在资源有限国家增加血液捐献的当前方法。
Transfus Med. 2019 Oct;29(5):297-310. doi: 10.1111/tme.12629. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
3
Problems and challenges: development of blood transfusion services in Mainland China within the context of health-care system reform.问题与挑战:中国大陆医疗体系改革背景下的输血服务发展
Transfus Med. 2019 Aug;29(4):253-261. doi: 10.1111/tme.12618. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
4
Pattern of blood donation and characteristics of blood donors in Enugu, Southeast Nigeria.尼日利亚东南部埃努古的献血模式及献血者特征
Niger J Clin Pract. 2018 Nov;21(11):1438-1443. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_346_17.
5
Access to safe blood in low-income and middle-income countries: lessons from India.低收入和中等收入国家安全血液的获取:来自印度的经验教训。
BMJ Glob Health. 2017 May 18;2(2):e000167. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2016-000167. eCollection 2017.
6
Who donates? Cross-country and periodical variation in blood donor demographics in Europe between 1994 and 2014.谁是献血者?1994年至2014年间欧洲献血者人口统计学的跨国和周期性变化。
Transfusion. 2017 Nov;57(11):2619-2628. doi: 10.1111/trf.14272. Epub 2017 Aug 25.
7
A Dynamic Estimation of Obesity Using Nhanes Data: A Pseudo-Panel Approach.使用美国国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)数据对肥胖进行动态估计:一种伪面板方法。
Health Econ. 2017 Dec;26(12):e140-e159. doi: 10.1002/hec.3488. Epub 2017 Mar 27.
8
Blood shortages and donation in China.中国的血液短缺与献血情况
Lancet. 2016 May 7;387(10031):1905. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30416-0.
9
Blood shortages and donation in China.中国的血液短缺与献血情况。
Lancet. 2016 May 7;387(10031):1905-6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30417-2.
10
Family donors are critical and legitimate in developing countries.在发展中国家,家庭捐赠者至关重要且合理合法。
Asian J Transfus Sci. 2016 Jan-Jun;10(1):5-11. doi: 10.4103/0973-6247.164270.