Sagnak Muhittin, Berberoglu Yalcin, Memis İlker, Yazgan Ogulcan
Department of Information Management, Izmir Kâtip Celebi University, Balatcik Kampusu, 35620 Cigli/Izmir, Turkey.
Yasar University, Universite Caddesi, No: 37-39, Bornova/Izmir, Turkey.
Waste Manag. 2021 May 15;127:37-47. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2021.03.054. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
In emerging economies, electronic waste is an important problem, because it negatively affects the health of staff and people, and causes pollution. Moreover, the location of the collection center has a crucial role in sustainable supply chains. Therefore, in this study, a framework was proposed to identify the location of sustainable collection centers for e-waste. The criteria set includes 3 main criteria, and 23 sub-criteria, and 7 different location options. The main criteria cover economic, social, and environmental criteria, which are organized as the Triple-Bottom-Line dimensions. Alternatives are Manisa, Menemen, Gaziemir, Kemalpaşa, Torbalı, Çiğli, and Akhisar. Fuzzy Best-Worst Method (BWM) and Fuzzy TOPSIS methods are used to calculate the weights of criteria and rankings of the alternatives, respectively. Transportation cost was found as the most important criterion for sustainable collection center selection, followed by collection cost, storage/holding cost, land cost, greenhouse gas emissions, energy cost, tax, and investment cost, respectively. Among other alternatives, Çiğli was found as the best alternative for sustainable collection center, followed by Gaziemir, and Manisa. Managerial implications were presented based on the findings.
在新兴经济体中，电子垃圾是一个重要问题，因为它会对工作人员和民众的健康产生负面影响，并造成污染。此外，回收中心的选址在可持续供应链中起着至关重要的作用。因此，在本研究中，提出了一个框架来确定电子垃圾可持续回收中心的位置。设定的标准包括3个主要标准、23个子标准和7个不同的选址选项。主要标准涵盖经济、社会和环境标准，这些标准按照三重底线维度进行组织。备选地点有马尼萨、梅内门、加济米尔、凯末尔帕夏、托尔巴利、奇利和阿希萨尔。分别使用模糊最佳-最差方法（BWM）和模糊TOPSIS方法来计算标准的权重和备选方案的排名。结果发现，运输成本是可持续回收中心选址最重要的标准，其次分别是回收成本、存储/持有成本、土地成本、温室气体排放、能源成本、税收和投资成本。在其他备选方案中，奇利被认为是可持续回收中心的最佳选址，其次是加济米尔和马尼萨。基于研究结果提出了管理启示。
