• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Health-care professionals' assessment of a person-centred intervention to empower self-management and health across chronic illness: Qualitative findings from a process evaluation study.卫生保健专业人员对以患者为中心的干预措施的评估,以增强慢性病患者的自我管理和健康:来自过程评估研究的定性发现。
Health Expect. 2021 Aug;24(4):1367-1377. doi: 10.1111/hex.13271. Epub 2021 May 2.
2
Health Care Professionals' Experiences of Facilitating Patient Activation and Empowerment in Chronic Illness using a Person-Centered and Strengths-Based Self-Management Program.医疗保健专业人员在使用以患者为中心和基于优势的自我管理计划促进慢性病患者的激活和赋权方面的经验。
Chronic Illn. 2023 Mar;19(1):250-264. doi: 10.1177/17423953211065006. Epub 2021 Dec 14.
3
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
4
Following a standardised pathway: Healthcare professionals' perspectives on person-centred care within ERAS for patients with colorectal cancer.遵循标准化路径:医疗保健专业人员对结直肠癌患者 ERAS 中以患者为中心的护理的看法。
J Clin Nurs. 2023 Jul;32(13-14):4070-4080. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16562. Epub 2022 Oct 19.
5
How can we achieve person-centred care for people living with HIV/AIDS? A qualitative interview study with healthcare professionals and patients in Ghana.我们如何为艾滋病毒/艾滋病感染者提供以患者为中心的护理?对加纳的医疗保健专业人员和患者进行的定性访谈研究。
AIDS Care. 2020 Dec;32(12):1479-1488. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2019.1698708. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
6
Person-centred care in individuals with stroke: a qualitative study using in-depth interviews.以个体为中心的脑卒中患者护理:一项采用深入访谈法的定性研究。
Ann Med. 2022 Dec;54(1):2167-2180. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2022.2105393.
7
Patients' perceptions and experiences of patient-centred care in dietetic consultations.患者对营养咨询中以患者为中心的护理的看法和体验。
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2018 Apr;31(2):188-196. doi: 10.1111/jhn.12507. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
8
Exploration of dynamics in a complex person-centred intervention process based on health professionals' perspectives.基于卫生专业人员视角探索复杂的以人为本干预过程中的动态变化。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jun 13;18(1):441. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3218-3.
9
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.
10
Health professionals and patients' perspectives on person-centred maternal and child healthcare in Burkina Faso.卫生专业人员和患者对布基纳法索以患者为中心的母婴保健的看法。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 1;15(4):e0230340. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230340. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
Testing the TEC-MED-Integrated Transcultural Social-Ethical-Care Model for Older People in the Mediterranean Basin: A Mixed-Method Quasiexperimental Study Protocol.测试地中海盆地老年人的TEC-医学-综合跨文化社会伦理护理模式:一项混合方法准实验研究方案。
Int J Integr Care. 2025 May 9;25(2):9. doi: 10.5334/ijic.9017. eCollection 2025 Apr-Jun.
2
The effect of patient-centered empowerment program through telenursing on self-management in people with multiple sclerosis: a double-blinded randomized clinical trial.通过远程护理实施的以患者为中心的赋权计划对多发性硬化症患者自我管理的影响:一项双盲随机临床试验。
BMC Neurol. 2025 Apr 2;25(1):138. doi: 10.1186/s12883-025-04148-x.
3
Tailoring nursing interventions to empower patients: personal coping strategies and self-management in type 2 diabetes care.量身定制护理干预措施以增强患者能力:2型糖尿病护理中的个人应对策略与自我管理
BMC Nurs. 2024 Dec 19;23(1):926. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02573-w.
4
Navigating process evaluation in co-creation: a Health CASCADE scoping review of used frameworks and assessed components.共同创作中的过程评估:Health CASCADE 综述框架的使用和评估组件。
BMJ Glob Health. 2024 Jul 4;9(7):e014483. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-014483.
5
A rapid literature review on the health-related outcomes of long-term person-centered care models in adults with chronic illness.对慢性病成人长期以患者为中心的护理模式的健康相关结局进行快速文献回顾。
Front Public Health. 2023 Aug 21;11:1213816. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1213816. eCollection 2023.
6
Barriers to and enablers of the promotion of patient and family participation in primary healthcare nursing in Brazil, Germany and Spain: A qualitative study.巴西、德国和西班牙促进患者和家属参与初级保健护理的障碍和促进因素:一项定性研究。
Health Expect. 2023 Dec;26(6):2396-2408. doi: 10.1111/hex.13843. Epub 2023 Aug 10.
7
Investigating the needs and concerns of older adults with multimorbidity and their healthcare professionals for conceivable digital psychotherapeutic interventions.调查患有多种疾病的老年人及其医疗保健专业人员对可想象的数字心理治疗干预措施的需求和担忧。
Digit Health. 2022 May 22;8:20552076221089097. doi: 10.1177/20552076221089097. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Abstraction and interpretation during the qualitative content analysis process.定性内容分析过程中的抽象和解释。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2020 Aug;108:103632. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103632. Epub 2020 May 15.
2
'It takes time, but recovering makes it worthwhile'- A qualitative study of long-term users' experiences of physiotherapy in primary health care.“这需要时间,但康复是值得的”- 一项关于长期使用者在初级卫生保健中接受物理治疗的体验的定性研究。
Physiother Theory Pract. 2021 Jan;37(1):6-16. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2019.1616343. Epub 2019 May 13.
3
Criteria for evaluating transferability of health interventions: a systematic review and thematic synthesis.评估卫生干预措施可转移的标准:系统评价和主题综合分析。
Implement Sci. 2018 Jun 26;13(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0751-8.
4
Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: Trustworthiness and publishing.系列:定性研究实用指南。第 4 部分:可信性和出版。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2018 Dec;24(1):120-124. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2017.1375092. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
5
Health promotion in specialist and community care: how a broadly applicable health promotion intervention influences patient's sense of coherence.专科与社区护理中的健康促进:一项广泛适用的健康促进干预措施如何影响患者的连贯感。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2018 Jun;32(2):690-697. doi: 10.1111/scs.12498. Epub 2017 Jul 12.
6
A scoping review of the literature on benefits and challenges of participating in patient education programs aimed at promoting self-management for people living with chronic illness.一项针对参与旨在促进慢性病患者自我管理的患者教育项目的益处与挑战的文献综述。
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Nov;99(11):1759-1771. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.07.027. Epub 2016 Jul 18.
7
Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies: Guided by Information Power.定性访谈研究中的样本量:以信息力为导向
Qual Health Res. 2016 Nov;26(13):1753-1760. doi: 10.1177/1049732315617444. Epub 2016 Jul 10.
8
The relationship between clinical and recovery dimensions of outcome in mental health.心理健康结果的临床维度与康复维度之间的关系。
Schizophr Res. 2016 Aug;175(1-3):142-147. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2015.10.031. Epub 2015 Oct 31.
9
Self-Management Support Interventions for Stroke Survivors: A Systematic Meta-Review.中风幸存者的自我管理支持干预措施:系统元综述
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 23;10(7):e0131448. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131448. eCollection 2015.
10
Personalised care planning for adults with chronic or long-term health conditions.为患有慢性或长期健康问题的成年人制定个性化护理计划。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 3;2015(3):CD010523. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010523.pub2.

卫生保健专业人员对以患者为中心的干预措施的评估,以增强慢性病患者的自我管理和健康:来自过程评估研究的定性发现。

Health-care professionals' assessment of a person-centred intervention to empower self-management and health across chronic illness: Qualitative findings from a process evaluation study.

机构信息

Lovisenberg Diaconal University College, Oslo, Norway.

College of Health Professions, Pace University, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2021 Aug;24(4):1367-1377. doi: 10.1111/hex.13271. Epub 2021 May 2.

DOI:10.1111/hex.13271
PMID:33934447
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8369120/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Person-centred care (PCC) empowers patients to manage their chronic illness and promote their health in accordance with their own beliefs, values and preferences. Drawing on health-care professional's (HCP's) experiences implementing an empowerment-focused, person-centred intervention called the Bodyknowledging Program (BKP), we undertook a process evaluation that aimed to assess the impact on patient health and well-being.

METHODS

We used individual in-depth interviews and semi-structured focus groups comprising n = 8 interprofessional HCP who facilitated intervention sessions with n = 58 patients situated in Norwegian specialist care sites. Content analysis was used to analyse the data and summarize major themes.

RESULTS

Health-care professional interviews revealed four main ways in which the intervention operated in support of health-related patient outcomes: (i) addressing the whole person; (ii) hope and affirmation; (iii) expanding recovery; and (iv) social support and revitalized relationships. The intervention provided new tools for patients to understand the social, emotional and physical impact of their illness. Health-care professional reported new insights to facilitate patient engagement and to promote patients' health.

CONCLUSIONS

The Bodyknowledging Program facilitated patient engagement through the promotion of patient-centred care while developing the patients' ability to exploit their own resources for effectively managing their health within illness. The process evaluation supported the underlying theoretical basis of the intervention and was suggestive of its potential transferability elsewhere.

摘要

背景

以患者为中心的护理(PCC)使患者能够根据自己的信仰、价值观和偏好来管理自己的慢性疾病并促进自己的健康。本研究借鉴医疗保健专业人员(HCP)实施以赋权为重点、以患者为中心的干预措施——Bodyknowledging 计划(BKP)的经验,进行了一项过程评估,旨在评估其对患者健康和福祉的影响。

方法

我们使用个体深入访谈和半结构化焦点小组,包括 n=8 名跨专业 HCP,他们在挪威专科护理场所为 n=58 名患者提供干预服务。我们使用内容分析法分析数据并总结主要主题。

结果

医疗保健专业人员的访谈揭示了该干预措施支持与健康相关的患者结果的四种主要方式:(i)关注整个人;(ii)希望和肯定;(iii)扩大康复;和(iv)社会支持和恢复活力的关系。该干预措施为患者提供了新的工具,以了解其疾病对社会、情感和身体的影响。医疗保健专业人员报告了新的见解,以促进患者的参与并促进患者的健康。

结论

Bodyknowledging 计划通过促进以患者为中心的护理来促进患者的参与,同时培养患者有效管理自己健康的能力,使他们能够利用自己的资源应对疾病。该过程评估支持了干预措施的潜在理论基础,并表明其在其他地方具有潜在的可转移性。