NSW Regional Health Partners, Newcastle, Australia.
School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.
J Health Organ Manag. 2021 May 4;ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print):701-16. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-06-2020-0218.
The purpose of this paper is to argue for an improved conceptualisation of health service research, using Stengers' (2018) metaphor of "slow science" as a critical yardstick.
DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: The paper is structured in three parts. It first reviews the field of health services research and the approaches that dominate it. It then considers the healthcare research approaches whose principles and methodologies are more aligned with "slow science" before presenting a description of a "slow science" project in which the authors are currently engaged.
Current approaches to health service research struggle to offer adequate resources for resolving frontline complexity, principally because they set more store by knowledge generalisation, disciplinary continuity and integrity and the consolidation of expertise, than by engaging with frontline complexity on its terms, negotiating issues with frontline staff and patients on their terms and framing findings and solutions in ways that key in to the dynamics and complexities that define health service delivery.
ORIGINALITY/VALUE: There is a need to engage in a paradigm shift that engages health services as co-researchers, prioritising practical change and local involvement over knowledge production. Economics is a research field where the products are of natural appeal to powerful health service managers. A "slow science" approach adopted by the embedded Economist Program with its emphasis on pre-implementation, knowledge mobilisation and parallel site capacity development sets out how research can be flexibly produced to improve health services.
本文旨在通过使用 Stengers(2018)关于“慢科学”的隐喻作为批判性标准,来论证改进卫生服务研究的概念化。
设计/方法/途径:本文分为三个部分。首先回顾了卫生服务研究领域以及主导该领域的方法。然后考虑了与“慢科学”更一致的医疗保健研究方法,然后介绍了作者目前正在参与的一个“慢科学”项目的描述。
当前的卫生服务研究方法在解决一线复杂性方面难以提供足够的资源,主要是因为它们更重视知识概括、学科连续性和完整性以及专业知识的巩固,而不是根据一线复杂性的条件进行接触,根据一线员工和患者的条件与他们协商问题,并以符合定义卫生服务提供的动态和复杂性的方式构建发现和解决方案。
原创性/价值:有必要进行范式转变,使卫生服务成为共同研究者,将实际变革和当地参与置于知识生产之上。经济学是一个研究领域,其研究成果对有影响力的卫生服务管理者具有天然吸引力。嵌入式经济学家计划采用的“慢科学”方法强调实施前、知识动员和并行站点能力发展,说明了如何灵活地开展研究以改善卫生服务。