Cai Hannah C, King Leanne E, Dwyer Johanna T
Frances Stern Nutrition Center, Tufts Medical Center and Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA 02111, USA.
Cone Health, Greensboro, NC 27401, USA.
Curr Dev Nutr. 2021 Feb 3;5(2):nzab002. doi: 10.1093/cdn/nzab002. eCollection 2021 Feb.
We assessed the quality of online health and nutrition information using a Google™ search on "supplements for cancer". Search results were scored using the Health Information Quality Index (HIQI), a quality-rating tool consisting of 12 objective criteria related to website domain, lack of commercial aspects, and authoritative nature of the health and nutrition information provided. Possible scores ranged from 0 (lowest) to 12 ("perfect" or highest quality). After eliminating irrelevant results, the remaining 160 search results had median and mean scores of 8. One-quarter of the results were of high quality (score of 10-12). There was no correlation between high-quality scores and early appearance in the sequence of search results, where results are presumably more visible. Also, 496 advertisements, over twice the number of search results, appeared. We conclude that the Google™ search engine may have shortcomings when used to obtain information on dietary supplements and cancer.
我们通过在谷歌™上搜索“癌症补充剂”来评估在线健康和营养信息的质量。搜索结果使用健康信息质量指数(HIQI)进行评分,这是一种质量评级工具,由12条与网站域名、非商业性质以及所提供健康和营养信息的权威性相关的客观标准组成。可能的分数范围从0(最低)到12(“完美”或最高质量)。在剔除不相关结果后,剩下的160条搜索结果的中位数和平均分数为8分。四分之一的结果质量较高(分数为10 - 12)。高质量分数与搜索结果序列中较早出现(据推测结果更易被看到)之间没有相关性。此外,出现了496条广告,数量是搜索结果的两倍多。我们得出结论,当使用谷歌™搜索引擎获取有关膳食补充剂和癌症的信息时可能存在缺陷。