• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在新冠疫情期间,利用社区参与式研究伙伴关系对弱势群体进行危机和紧急风险沟通。

Leveraging community engaged research partnerships for crisis and emergency risk communication to vulnerable populations in the COVID-19 pandemic.

作者信息

Wieland Mark L, Asiedu Gladys B, Lantz Kiley, Abbenyi Adeline, Njeru Jane W, Osman Ahmed, Goodson Miriam, Ahmed Yahye, Molina Luz E, Doubeni Chyke A, Sia Irene G

机构信息

Division of Community Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Kern Center for the Science of Healthcare Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Transl Sci. 2020 May 15;5(1):e6. doi: 10.1017/cts.2020.47.

DOI:10.1017/cts.2020.47
PMID:33942018
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7605400/
Abstract

Community engagement is important for reaching vulnerable populations in the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. A risk communication framework was implemented by a community-engaged research (CEnR) partnership in Southeast Minnesota to address COVID-19 prevention, testing, and socioeconomic impacts. Bidirectional communication between Communication Leaders and community members within their social networks was used by the partnership to refine messages, leverage resources, and advise policy makers. Over 14 days, messages were delivered by 24 Communication Leaders in 6 languages across 9 electronic platforms to 9882 individuals within their networks. CEnR partnerships may effectively implement crisis and emergency risk communication to vulnerable populations in a pandemic.

摘要

社区参与对于在2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间接触弱势群体至关重要。明尼苏达州东南部的一个社区参与研究(CEnR)伙伴关系实施了一个风险沟通框架,以应对COVID-19的预防、检测和社会经济影响。该伙伴关系利用沟通领导者与他们社交网络中的社区成员之间的双向沟通来完善信息、利用资源并为政策制定者提供建议。在14天的时间里,24名沟通领导者通过9个电子平台,用6种语言向其社交网络中的9882人传递了信息。CEnR伙伴关系可以有效地向大流行中的弱势群体实施危机和紧急风险沟通。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f3d/8057378/953c02653851/S2059866120000473_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f3d/8057378/953c02653851/S2059866120000473_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f3d/8057378/953c02653851/S2059866120000473_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Leveraging community engaged research partnerships for crisis and emergency risk communication to vulnerable populations in the COVID-19 pandemic.在新冠疫情期间,利用社区参与式研究伙伴关系对弱势群体进行危机和紧急风险沟通。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2020 May 15;5(1):e6. doi: 10.1017/cts.2020.47.
2
Adaptation of a bidirectional crisis and emergency risk communication framework by community-engaged research partnerships in rural Mississippi during the COVID-19 pandemic.在新冠疫情期间,密西西比州农村地区社区参与式研究伙伴关系对双向危机与应急风险沟通框架的调整。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Feb 8;7(1):e79. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.15. eCollection 2023.
3
Community-Engaged Bidirectional Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication With Immigrant and Refugee Populations During the COVID-19 Pandemic.社区参与式双向危机和紧急风险沟通在 COVID-19 大流行期间与移民和难民群体。
Public Health Rep. 2022 Mar-Apr;137(2):352-361. doi: 10.1177/00333549211065514. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
4
Emergency Preparedness and Risk Communication Among African American Churches: Leveraging a Community-Based Participatory Research Partnership COVID-19 Initiative.非裔美国人教会中的应急准备与风险沟通:利用基于社区的参与性研究伙伴关系开展的新冠疫情倡议。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2020 Dec 10;17:E158. doi: 10.5888/pcd17.200408.
5
Community engagement during COVID: A field report from seven CTSAs.新冠疫情期间的社区参与:来自七个临床与转化科学奖项目的实地报告
J Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Apr 27;5(1):e104. doi: 10.1017/cts.2021.785.
6
Digital Inequality During a Pandemic: Quantitative Study of Differences in COVID-19-Related Internet Uses and Outcomes Among the General Population.大流行期间的数字不平等:普通人群中与COVID-19相关的互联网使用情况及结果差异的定量研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 20;22(8):e20073. doi: 10.2196/20073.
7
Informatics response to address the COVID-19 pandemic in a safety net healthcare system.信息学应对安全网医疗系统中新冠疫情的措施。
JAMIA Open. 2021 Feb 22;4(3):ooaa057. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaa057. eCollection 2021 Jul.
8
Community Calls: Lessons and Insights Gained from a Medical-Religious Community Engagement During the COVID-19 Pandemic.社区呼吁:新冠疫情期间医疗-宗教社区参与所获的经验与见解
J Relig Health. 2020 Oct;59(5):2256-2262. doi: 10.1007/s10943-020-01057-w.
9
[Health professionals facing the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic: What are the mental health risks?].面对2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行的卫生专业人员:心理健康风险有哪些?
Encephale. 2020 Jun;46(3S):S73-S80. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2020.04.008. Epub 2020 Apr 22.
10
Communicating COVID-19 health information to culturally and linguistically diverse communities: insights from a participatory research collaboration.向文化和语言多样化社区传播 COVID-19 健康信息:来自参与式研究合作的见解。
Public Health Res Pract. 2021 Mar 10;31(1):3112105. doi: 10.17061/phrp3112105.

引用本文的文献

1
The Relationship among Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication, Managerial Support, and Nurses' Social Capital During COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间危机与应急风险沟通、管理支持及护士社会资本之间的关系
SAGE Open Nurs. 2025 May 21;11:23779608251343613. doi: 10.1177/23779608251343613. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Applying Social Marketing Principles for Community-Based Cancer Screening Programs: Two Case Studies.将社会营销原则应用于社区癌症筛查项目:两个案例研究。
Health Educ Behav. 2025 Aug;52(4):382-391. doi: 10.1177/10901981251322806. Epub 2025 Mar 18.
3
Inclusive Crisis Communication in a Pandemic Context: A Rapid Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Covid-19: control measures must be equitable and inclusive.新冠疫情:防控措施必须公平且具有包容性。
BMJ. 2020 Mar 20;368:m1141. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1141.
2
Partnerships, Processes, and Outcomes: A Health Equity-Focused Scoping Meta-Review of Community-Engaged Scholarship.伙伴关系、流程和结果:以健康公平为重点的社区参与式学术研究的范围元综述。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2020 Apr 2;41:177-199. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040119-094220. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
3
Health communication, public mistrust, and the politics of "rationality".健康传播、公众不信任与“理性”政治
大流行背景下的包容性危机沟通:快速综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Sep 16;21(9):1216. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21091216.
4
Community-engaged randomised controlled trial to disseminate COVID-19 vaccine-related information and increase uptake among Black individuals in two US cities with rheumatic conditions.社区参与式随机对照试验,以在美国两个有风湿条件的城市传播与 COVID-19 疫苗相关的信息,并提高黑人个体的接种率。
BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 24;14(8):e087918. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087918.
5
Equity-informed social media COVID-19 risk communication strategies: a scoping review.基于公平理念的社交媒体 COVID-19 风险传播策略:范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 12;14(8):e085630. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085630.
6
Utilizing social media for community risk communication in megacities: analysing the impact of WeChat group information interaction and perception on communication satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic in Shanghai.利用社交媒体进行特大城市社区风险沟通:分析在 COVID-19 大流行期间,微信群组信息互动和感知对上海沟通满意度的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jul 15;24(1):1889. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19276-1.
7
Enhancing Community Engagement in Research: A Tiered Approach.加强社区在研究中的参与:一种分层方法。
Am J Public Health. 2024 May;114(S5):S372-S376. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2024.307608.
8
A community-engaged approach to translate a Vaccine Hesitancy Scale into Haitian Creole.一种社区参与式方法,将疫苗犹豫量表翻译为海地克里奥尔语。
Vaccine. 2024 Apr 2;42(9):2127-2134. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.02.079. Epub 2024 Mar 7.
9
Assessing Changes in COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake and Intentions among the Brigada Digital Latino Social Media Audience: A Repeated Cross-Sectional Study.评估拉丁裔数字社区社交媒体受众中新冠疫苗接种率和接种意愿的变化:一项重复横断面研究。
Res Sq. 2023 Nov 20:rs.3.rs-3611896. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3611896/v1.
10
Addressing COVID-19 inequities using bidirectional crisis and emergency risk communication and vaccine clinic interventions: a descriptive study.利用双向危机和应急风险沟通以及疫苗接种诊所干预措施解决 COVID-19 不平等问题:一项描述性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Aug 10;23(1):1517. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16410-3.
Am J Bioeth. 2015;15(4):57-9. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2015.1009570.
4
Community-based participatory research contributions to intervention research: the intersection of science and practice to improve health equity.基于社区的参与式研究对干预研究的贡献:科学与实践的交叉点,以改善健康公平。
Am J Public Health. 2010 Apr 1;100 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S40-6. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.184036. Epub 2010 Feb 10.
5
Effective health risk communication about pandemic influenza for vulnerable populations.针对弱势群体进行有效的大流行性流感健康风险沟通。
Am J Public Health. 2009 Oct;99 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S324-32. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.162537.
6
Pandemic influenza planning in the United States from a health disparities perspective.从健康差异角度看美国的大流行性流感规划。
Emerg Infect Dis. 2008 May;14(5):709-15. doi: 10.3201/eid1405.071301.