• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

窦房结疾病的长期起搏:刺激模式对心血管发病率和死亡率的影响。

Long-term pacing in sinus node disease: effects of stimulation mode on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.

作者信息

Rosenqvist M, Brandt J, Schüller H

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge University Hospital, Sweden.

出版信息

Am Heart J. 1988 Jul;116(1 Pt 1):16-22. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(88)90244-x.

DOI:10.1016/0002-8703(88)90244-x
PMID:3394616
Abstract

In a previous retrospective treatment-comparison study of 168 patients with sinus node disease, we found a significantly higher incidence of permanent atrial fibrillation and congestive heart failure in patients treated with ventricular (VVI) pacing compared to atrial (AAI) pacing, after an average follow-up period of 2 years. To determine whether these differences persisted and whether AAI pacing resulted in a lower mortality rate than VVI pacing during long-term follow-up, the treatment groups were restudied after an average of 4 years of pacemaker treatment. The incidence of permanent atrial fibrillation was still significantly higher (p less than 0.0005) in the VVI group than in the AAI group after the additional 2 years (VVI = 47%, an increase from 29%; AAI = 6.7%, an increase from 3.4%). Congestive heart failure occurred significantly more often in the VVI group than in the AAI group (37% vs 15%, p less than 0.005). Analysis of survival data showed a higher overall mortality rate in the VVI group (23% vs 8%, p less than 0.05). The development of high-degree atrioventricular block in the AAI group remained low (total 4.5%). Thus, in sinus node disease, the advantages of AAI over VVI pacing persist during long-term follow-up. The differences in cardiovascular morbidity between the groups tend to increase with time and appear to result in a lower mortality rate among patients treated with AAI pacing.

摘要

在之前一项针对168例窦房结疾病患者的回顾性治疗对比研究中,我们发现,在平均随访2年后,与心房(AAI)起搏治疗的患者相比,心室(VVI)起搏治疗的患者永久性房颤和充血性心力衰竭的发生率显著更高。为了确定这些差异在长期随访中是否持续存在,以及AAI起搏是否比VVI起搏导致更低的死亡率,在平均进行了4年的起搏器治疗后,对各治疗组进行了再次研究。在额外的2年随访后,VVI组永久性房颤的发生率仍显著高于AAI组(p<0.0005)(VVI组为47%,较之前的29%有所增加;AAI组为6.7%,较之前的3.4%有所增加)。VVI组充血性心力衰竭的发生率显著高于AAI组(37%对15%,p<0.005)。生存数据分析显示,VVI组的总死亡率更高(23%对8%,p<0.05)。AAI组高度房室传导阻滞的发生率仍然较低(总计4.5%)。因此,在窦房结疾病中,AAI起搏相对于VVI起搏的优势在长期随访中仍然存在。两组之间心血管疾病发病率的差异往往随时间增加,并且似乎导致接受AAI起搏治疗的患者死亡率更低。

相似文献

1
Long-term pacing in sinus node disease: effects of stimulation mode on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.窦房结疾病的长期起搏:刺激模式对心血管发病率和死亡率的影响。
Am Heart J. 1988 Jul;116(1 Pt 1):16-22. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(88)90244-x.
2
[Comparative effects of atrial and ventricular stimulation on morbidity and mortality in patients with sinus node disease].
Cardiologia. 1990 Jun;35(6):499-502.
3
Differences between atrial single chamber pacing (AAI) and ventricular single chamber pacing (VVI) with respect to prognosis and antiarrhythmic effect in patients with sick sinus syndrome.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1990 Dec;13(12 Pt 2):2080-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1990.tb06946.x.
4
Atrial versus ventricular pacing in sinus node disease: a treatment comparison study.窦房结疾病中房性起搏与室性起搏:一项治疗比较研究。
Am Heart J. 1986 Feb;111(2):292-7. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(86)90142-0.
5
Physiologic atrial cardiac pacing for the prevention of chronic atrial fibrillation associated with sick sinus syndrome.
ASAIO J. 2002 Jan-Feb;48(1):110-2. doi: 10.1097/00002480-200201000-00022.
6
Morbidity and mortality of patients with sinus node disease: comparative effects of atrial and ventricular pacing.窦房结疾病患者的发病率和死亡率:心房起搏与心室起搏的比较效果
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1990 Dec;13(12 Pt 2):2076-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1990.tb06945.x.
7
Deleterious effects of long-term single-chamber ventricular pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome: the hidden benefits of dual-chamber pacing.病态窦房结综合征患者长期单腔心室起搏的有害影响:双腔起搏的潜在益处。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992 Jun;19(7):1542-9. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(92)90616-u.
8
[Pacemaker therapy for the sick sinus node syndrome. Does the atrially involved pacemaker system lower the frequency of atrial fibrillation and thromboembolic complications as well as mortality?].[病窦综合征的起搏器治疗。心房参与的起搏器系统是否能降低心房颤动、血栓栓塞并发症的发生率以及死亡率?]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1994 Dec 9;119(49):1683-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1058887.
9
Natural history of sinus node disease treated with atrial pacing in 213 patients: implications for selection of stimulation mode.213例接受心房起搏治疗的窦房结疾病自然史:对刺激模式选择的启示
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992 Sep;20(3):633-9. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(92)90018-i.
10
Long-term clinical performance of AAI pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome: a comparison with dual-chamber pacing.病态窦房结综合征患者AAI起搏的长期临床疗效:与双腔起搏的比较。
Europace. 2004 Sep;6(5):444-50. doi: 10.1016/j.eupc.2004.05.003.

引用本文的文献

1
Phenogrouping and risk stratification of patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy upgrade using topological data analysis.应用拓扑数据分析对行心脏再同步化治疗升级的患者进行表型分组和风险分层。
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 23;13(1):20594. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-47092-x.
2
The Story of Managed Ventricular Pacing.心室程控起搏的故事
J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2021 Aug 15;12(8):4625-4632. doi: 10.19102/icrm.2021.120804. eCollection 2021 Aug.
3
How His bundle pacing prevents and reverses heart failure induced by right ventricular pacing.
希氏束起搏预防和逆转右心室起搏致心力衰竭的机制
Heart Fail Rev. 2021 Nov;26(6):1311-1324. doi: 10.1007/s10741-020-09962-8.
4
Long-term outcomes of cardiac resynchronization therapy in adult congenital heart disease.成人先天性心脏病患者心脏再同步治疗的长期疗效
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2019 Jun;42(6):573-580. doi: 10.1111/pace.13670. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
5
Safety and efficacy of AAIR pacing in selected patients with sick sinus syndrome.AAIR起搏在特定病态窦房结综合征患者中的安全性和有效性。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Oct;97(42):e12833. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012833.
6
Hybrid therapy in the management of atrial fibrillation.心房颤动管理中的联合治疗
Curr Cardiol Rev. 2015;11(2):167-79. doi: 10.2174/1573403x10666140713172231.
7
Potential prevention of pacing-induced heart failure using simple pacemaker programming algorithm.使用简单起搏器编程算法对起搏诱导的心力衰竭进行潜在预防。
Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2013 Jul;18(4):369-78. doi: 10.1111/anec.12049. Epub 2013 May 3.
8
Pacing-induced cardiomyopathy: pathophysiological insights through matrix metalloproteinases.起搏诱导性心肌病:通过基质金属蛋白酶获得的病理生理学见解
Heart Fail Rev. 2014 Sep;19(5):669-80. doi: 10.1007/s10741-013-9390-y.
9
Long-term mortality outcomes according to the frequency of right ventricular pacing in veterans.根据退伍军人右心室起搏频率的长期死亡率结果。
Cardiol Res Pract. 2010;2010:310768. doi: 10.4061/2010/310768. Epub 2010 May 5.
10
Pacemaker prevention therapy in drug-refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: reliability of diagnostics and effectiveness of prevention pacing therapy in Vitatron selection device.药物难治性阵发性心房颤动的起搏器预防治疗:Vitatron 选择装置中诊断的可靠性及预防起搏治疗的有效性
Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2006 Apr 1;6(2):63-74.