Faculty of Education, Arts and Sports, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Norway.
Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
J Sports Sci Med. 2021 Mar 5;20(2):181-187. doi: 10.52082/jssm.2021.181. eCollection 2021 Jun.
The aim of the study was to compare neuromuscular activation in the gluteus maximus, the biceps femoris and the erector spinae from the Romanian deadlift, the 45-degree Roman chair back extension and the seated machine back extension. Fifteen resistance-trained females performed three repetitions with 6-RM loading in all exercises in a randomized and counterbalanced order. The activation in the whole movement as well as its lower and upper parts were analyzed. The results showed that the Romanian deadlift and the Roman chair back extension activated the gluteus maximus more than the seated machine back extension (94-140%, p < 0.01). For the biceps femoris the Roman chair elicited higher activation compared to both the Romanian deadlift and the seated machine back extension (71-174%). Further, the Romanian deadlift activated the biceps femoris more compared to the seated machine back extension (61%, p < 0.01). The analyses of the different parts of the movement showed that the Roman chair produced higher levels of activation in the upper part for both the gluteus maximus and the biceps femoris, compared to the other exercises. There were no differences in activation of the erector spinae between the three exercises (p = 1.00). In conclusion, both the Roman deadlift and the Roman chair back extension would be preferable to the seated machine back extension in regards to gluteus maximus activation. The Roman chair was superior in activating the biceps femoris compared to the two other exercises. All three exercises are appropriate selections for activating the lower back muscles. For overall lower limb activation, the Roman chair was the best exercise.
本研究旨在比较罗马尼亚硬拉、45 度罗马椅后伸和坐式机器后伸这 3 种运动中,臀大肌、股二头肌和竖脊肌的神经肌肉激活情况。15 名有抗阻训练经验的女性以随机和交替的顺序,在所有运动中完成 3 组 6RM 负荷的重复运动。分析了整个运动以及其上下部分的激活情况。结果表明,罗马尼亚硬拉和罗马椅后伸比坐式机器后伸更能激活臀大肌(94-140%,p<0.01)。对于股二头肌,罗马椅的激活程度高于罗马尼亚硬拉和坐式机器后伸(71-174%)。此外,罗马尼亚硬拉比坐式机器后伸更能激活股二头肌(61%,p<0.01)。对运动不同部分的分析表明,与其他运动相比,罗马椅在上下两部分都能产生更高水平的臀大肌和股二头肌激活。3 种运动对竖脊肌的激活没有差异(p=1.00)。总之,就臀大肌激活而言,罗马尼亚硬拉和罗马椅后伸比坐式机器后伸更可取。罗马椅在激活股二头肌方面优于其他两种运动。所有 3 种运动都适合激活下背部肌肉。对于整体下肢激活,罗马椅是最好的运动。