Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Program in Public Health, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA.
Department of Health, Society, and Behavior, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA.
Environ Sci Process Impacts. 2021 Jun 24;23(6):812-830. doi: 10.1039/d1em00007a.
(1) Background: exposure to heavy metals is associated with adverse health effects and disproportionately impacts low-income communities and communities of color. We carried out a community-based participatory research study to examine the distribution of heavy metal concentrations in the soil and social vulnerabilities to soil heavy metal exposures across Census tracts in Santa Ana, CA. (2) Methods: soil samples (n = 1528) of eight heavy metals including lead (Pb), arsenic (As), manganese (Mn), chromium (Cr), nickel (Ni), copper (Cu), cadmium (Cd), and zinc (Zn) were collected in 2018 across Santa Ana, CA, at a high spatial resolution and analyzed using XRF analysis. Metal concentrations were mapped out and American Community Survey data was utilized to assess metals throughout Census tracts in terms of social and economic variables. Risk assessment was conducted to evaluate carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic risk. (3) Results: concentrations of soil metals varied according to landuse type and socioeconomic factors. Census tracts where the median household income was under $50 000 had 390%, 92.9%, 56.6%, and 54.3% higher Pb, Zn, Cd, and As concentrations compared to high-income counterparts. All Census tracts in Santa Ana showed hazard index >1, implying the potential for non-carcinogenic health effects, and nearly all Census tracts showed a cancer risk above 10-4, implying a greater than acceptable risk. Risk was predominantly driven by childhood exposure. (4) Conclusions: findings inform initiatives related to environmental justice and highlight subpopulations at elevated risk of heavy metal exposure, in turn underscoring the need for community-driven recommendations for policies and other actions to remediate soil contamination and protect the health of residents.
(1) 背景:接触重金属会对健康产生不良影响,而且不成比例地影响低收入社区和有色人种社区。我们开展了一项基于社区的参与式研究,以研究加利福尼亚州圣安娜市的各个普查区内土壤中重金属浓度的分布情况,以及接触土壤重金属的社会脆弱性。(2) 方法:2018 年,我们在加利福尼亚州圣安娜市以高空间分辨率采集了 1528 个土壤样本,分析了包括铅(Pb)、砷(As)、锰(Mn)、铬(Cr)、镍(Ni)、铜(Cu)、镉(Cd)和锌(Zn)在内的 8 种重金属的浓度,使用 XRF 分析进行了分析。根据社会和经济变量,利用美国社区调查数据评估了普查区内的金属分布情况。还进行了风险评估,以评估致癌和非致癌风险。(3) 结果:土壤金属浓度因土地利用类型和社会经济因素而异。家庭收入中位数低于 50000 美元的普查区,其 Pb、Zn、Cd 和 As 浓度分别比高收入对应地区高出 390%、92.9%、56.6%和 54.3%。圣安娜的所有普查区的危害指数都大于 1,这意味着存在潜在的非致癌健康影响,而且几乎所有普查区的癌症风险都超过了 10-4,这意味着风险不可接受。风险主要是由儿童暴露引起的。(4) 结论:研究结果为与环境正义相关的举措提供了信息,并强调了处于重金属暴露风险较高的亚人群,这反过来又强调了需要社区驱动的政策建议和其他行动,以修复土壤污染并保护居民的健康。