• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于G-DINA模型的汉语听力理解能力认知诊断研究

Research on the Cognitive Diagnosis of Chinese Listening Comprehension Ability Based on the G-DINA Model.

作者信息

Li Li, An Yi, Ren Jie, Wei Xiaoman

机构信息

Collaborative Innovation Center of Assessment for Basic Education Quality, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.

Institute of Language Testing and Talent Evaluation, Faculty of Linguistic Sciences, Beijing Language and Culture University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 7;12:714568. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.714568. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.714568
PMID:34557134
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8452943/
Abstract

As a new generation of measurement theory, cognitive diagnosis theory shows significant potential and advantages in educational evaluation in that it combines a cognitive process and a measurement method. The application of the theory not only reveals the potential characteristics of learners in cognitive processing, but also provides targeted remedies and strategic guidance for individuals. Given the difficulties of traditional assessment models in providing an insightful and fine-grained account for individualized and procedural learning, providing personalized learning strategies for learners of Chinese as a second language has been a new goal of teaching and measurement in Chinese listening. This study constructs a cognitive diagnosis model of Chinese listening comprehension for Chinese-as-a-second-language learners through theoretical exploration, model hypotheses, repeated verification, and model modification. The results show that the Q-matrix (Q) constructed by the experts within modification has the highest fitting degree with the empirical data. The parameter recovery rate, the accuracy of the tested attribute or mode, and the relative fitting index obtained from the simulation study are consistent with the information extracted from the empirical data. The diagnostic reliability and effectiveness of generalized deterministic inputs, noise "and" gate (G-DINA) are higher than those of DINA, deterministic inputs, noisy "or" gate (DINO), and reduced reparametrized unified model (RRUM). In the estimation of the item and subject parameters, the G-DINA model shows good convergence, and the average classification accuracy rate based on attribute level is 0.861.

摘要

作为新一代测量理论,认知诊断理论在教育评价中展现出显著潜力和优势,因为它将认知过程与测量方法相结合。该理论的应用不仅揭示了学习者在认知加工中的潜在特征,还为个体提供了针对性的补救措施和策略指导。鉴于传统评估模型难以对个性化和程序性学习进行深入且细致的描述,为汉语作为第二语言的学习者提供个性化学习策略已成为汉语听力教学与测量的新目标。本研究通过理论探索、模型假设、反复验证和模型修正,构建了汉语作为第二语言学习者汉语听力理解的认知诊断模型。结果表明,经修正后由专家构建的Q矩阵(Q)与实证数据的拟合度最高。模拟研究得到的参数恢复率、测试属性或模式的准确性以及相对拟合指数与从实证数据中提取的信息一致。广义确定性输入、噪声“与”门(G-DINA)的诊断可靠性和有效性高于确定性输入、噪声“或”门(DINA)、确定性输入、噪声“或”门(DINO)以及简化重新参数化统一模型(RRUM)。在项目和主体参数估计中,G-DINA模型表现出良好的收敛性,基于属性水平的平均分类准确率为0.861。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c673/8452943/ee298f0ec80f/fpsyg-12-714568-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c673/8452943/ffad777dad36/fpsyg-12-714568-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c673/8452943/41e83744ac8f/fpsyg-12-714568-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c673/8452943/f22cab16a965/fpsyg-12-714568-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c673/8452943/366b4dd675f2/fpsyg-12-714568-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c673/8452943/9c23b944baeb/fpsyg-12-714568-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c673/8452943/ee298f0ec80f/fpsyg-12-714568-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c673/8452943/ffad777dad36/fpsyg-12-714568-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c673/8452943/41e83744ac8f/fpsyg-12-714568-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c673/8452943/f22cab16a965/fpsyg-12-714568-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c673/8452943/366b4dd675f2/fpsyg-12-714568-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c673/8452943/9c23b944baeb/fpsyg-12-714568-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c673/8452943/ee298f0ec80f/fpsyg-12-714568-g0006.jpg

相似文献

1
Research on the Cognitive Diagnosis of Chinese Listening Comprehension Ability Based on the G-DINA Model.基于G-DINA模型的汉语听力理解能力认知诊断研究
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 7;12:714568. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.714568. eCollection 2021.
2
Examining Parameter Invariance in a General Diagnostic Classification Model.检验一般诊断分类模型中的参数不变性。
Front Psychol. 2020 Jan 13;10:2930. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02930. eCollection 2019.
3
The accuracy and consistency of mastery for each content domain using the Rasch and deterministic inputs, noisy “and” gate diagnostic classification models: a simulation study and a real-world analysis using data from the Korean Medical Licensing Examination.使用 Rasch 和确定性输入、嘈杂“与”门诊断分类模型对每个内容领域的掌握程度的准确性和一致性:一项基于韩国医师执照考试数据的模拟研究和真实世界分析。
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2021;18:15. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2021.18.15. Epub 2021 Jul 5.
4
Consistency of Cluster Analysis for Cognitive Diagnosis: The DINO Model and the DINA Model Revisited.认知诊断聚类分析的一致性:重新审视DINO模型和DINA模型
Appl Psychol Meas. 2015 Sep;39(6):465-479. doi: 10.1177/0146621615577087. Epub 2015 Apr 14.
5
An empirical Q-matrix validation method for the sequential generalized DINA model.序贯广义 DINA 模型的经验 Q 矩阵验证方法。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2020 Feb;73(1):142-163. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12156. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
6
Scalable Bayesian Approach for the Dina Q-Matrix Estimation Combining Stochastic Optimization and Variational Inference.可扩展的贝叶斯方法用于结合随机优化和变分推断的 Dina Q-矩阵估计。
Psychometrika. 2023 Mar;88(1):302-331. doi: 10.1007/s11336-022-09884-4. Epub 2022 Sep 12.
7
Bayesian Estimation of the DINA Q matrix.贝叶斯估计 DINA Q 矩阵。
Psychometrika. 2018 Mar;83(1):89-108. doi: 10.1007/s11336-017-9579-4. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
8
Estimation approaches in cognitive diagnosis modeling when attributes are hierarchically structured.认知诊断建模中属性呈层次结构时的估计方法。
Psicothema. 2020 Feb;32(1):122-129. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2019.182.
9
Multilevel Modeling of Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment: The Multilevel DINA Example.认知诊断评估的多层模型:多层DINA模型示例。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2019 Jan;43(1):34-50. doi: 10.1177/0146621618765713. Epub 2018 Apr 3.
10
Estimation of item parameters and examinees' mastery probability in each domain of the Korean medical licensing examination using deterministic inputs, noisy and gate(DINA) model.使用确定性输入、噪声与门(DINA)模型,对韩国医师执照考试各领域项目参数和考生掌握概率进行估计。
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2020;17:35. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2020.17.35. Epub 2020 Nov 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Determining the Number of Attributes in Cognitive Diagnosis Modeling.确定认知诊断建模中的属性数量。
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 15;12:614470. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.614470. eCollection 2021.
2
Balancing fit and parsimony to improve Q-matrix validation.平衡拟合度和简约度以改进 Q 矩阵验证。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2021 Jul;74 Suppl 1:110-130. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12228. Epub 2020 Nov 24.
3
Reconsidering Cutoff Points in the General Method of Empirical Q-Matrix Validation.重新审视经验性Q矩阵验证通用方法中的截止点
Educ Psychol Meas. 2019 Aug;79(4):727-753. doi: 10.1177/0013164418822700. Epub 2019 Jan 10.
4
Q-Matrix Estimation Methods for Cognitive Diagnosis Models: Based on Partial Known Q-Matrix.
Multivariate Behav Res. 2020 Apr 19:1-13. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2020.1746901.
5
An empirical Q-matrix validation method for the sequential generalized DINA model.序贯广义 DINA 模型的经验 Q 矩阵验证方法。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2020 Feb;73(1):142-163. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12156. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
6
Inferential Item-Fit Evaluation in Cognitive Diagnosis Modeling.认知诊断建模中的推断性项目拟合评估
Appl Psychol Meas. 2017 Nov;41(8):614-631. doi: 10.1177/0146621617707510. Epub 2017 May 19.
7
Model Similarity, Model Selection, and Attribute Classification.模型相似性、模型选择与属性分类。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2016 May;40(3):200-217. doi: 10.1177/0146621615621717. Epub 2016 Jan 18.
8
A General Method of Empirical Q-matrix Validation.一种经验性Q矩阵验证的通用方法。
Psychometrika. 2016 Jun;81(2):253-73. doi: 10.1007/s11336-015-9467-8. Epub 2015 May 6.
9
A general diagnostic model applied to language testing data.应用于语言测试数据的通用诊断模型。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2008 Nov;61(Pt 2):287-307. doi: 10.1348/000711007X193957. Epub 2007 Mar 22.