• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用带有集成器械的零轮廓独立椎间融合器对单节段和多节段前路颈椎间盘切除融合术的结果进行回顾性评估和分析。

A Retrospective Evaluation and Review of Outcomes for Single- and Multilevel ACDF With a Zero-Profile Stand-Alone Cage Device With Integrated Instrumentation.

作者信息

Khalifeh Kareem, Faulkner Jordan E, Hara Junko, Ozgur Burak

机构信息

Neurosurgery, ONE Brain and Spine Center, Newport Beach, USA.

Neurosurgery, Hoag Memorial Hospital, Newport Beach, USA.

出版信息

Cureus. 2021 Apr 3;13(4):e14283. doi: 10.7759/cureus.14283.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.14283
PMID:33959461
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8093780/
Abstract

This study aimed to assess clinical and radiological outcomes associated with zero-profile stand-alone cages with instrumentation used for single- and multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) operations. Many plate-cage ACDF systems have proven to be successful in producing high fusion rates and positive clinical outcomes. However, the anterior plating in traditional systems has been associated with complications such as dysphagia and mechanical accidents. A total of 190 patients underwent single- or multilevel ACDF surgeries with zero-profile polyetheretherketone cages containing integrated titanium instrumentation and screw fixation (one-level, n=31; two-level, n=65; three-level, n=71; four-level, n=23). Demographic information such as age and smoking status as well as postoperative outcomes were collected and analysed. Out of the 190 patients who underwent ACDF surgeries with a zero-profile stand-alone cage, none experienced any conditions or infections, and zero were readmitted postoperatively. Although traditional plate-cage systems yield high fusion rates in ACDF surgeries, zero-profile systems with integrated fixation have showcased impressive clinical and radiographic results in both single- and multilevel operations.

摘要

本研究旨在评估用于单节段和多节段颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)的零切迹独立融合器联合内固定的临床和影像学结果。许多钢板-融合器ACDF系统已被证明能成功实现高融合率并取得良好的临床效果。然而,传统系统中的前路钢板与吞咽困难和机械事故等并发症相关。共有190例患者接受了使用含一体式钛制内固定和螺钉固定的零切迹聚醚醚酮融合器的单节段或多节段ACDF手术(单节段,n = 31;双节段,n = 65;三节段,n = 71;四节段,n = 23)。收集并分析了年龄、吸烟状况等人口统计学信息以及术后结果。在190例接受零切迹独立融合器ACDF手术的患者中,无人出现任何病症或感染,术后零人再次入院。尽管传统的钢板-融合器系统在ACDF手术中融合率较高,但具有一体式固定的零切迹系统在单节段和多节段手术中均展现出了令人印象深刻的临床和影像学结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f3bd/8093780/f606da5b7868/cureus-0013-00000014283-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f3bd/8093780/d91e8780a311/cureus-0013-00000014283-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f3bd/8093780/f606da5b7868/cureus-0013-00000014283-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f3bd/8093780/d91e8780a311/cureus-0013-00000014283-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f3bd/8093780/f606da5b7868/cureus-0013-00000014283-i02.jpg

相似文献

1
A Retrospective Evaluation and Review of Outcomes for Single- and Multilevel ACDF With a Zero-Profile Stand-Alone Cage Device With Integrated Instrumentation.使用带有集成器械的零轮廓独立椎间融合器对单节段和多节段前路颈椎间盘切除融合术的结果进行回顾性评估和分析。
Cureus. 2021 Apr 3;13(4):e14283. doi: 10.7759/cureus.14283.
2
The Outcomes of Revision Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion Using a Stand-Alone Implant Versus Traditional Interbody Polyetheretherketone Cage, Titanium Plate, and Screw Instrumentation.使用独立植入物与传统椎间聚醚醚酮融合器、钛板及螺钉器械进行翻修性颈椎前路减压融合术的疗效
Cureus. 2023 Nov 22;15(11):e49246. doi: 10.7759/cureus.49246. eCollection 2023 Nov.
3
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with a zero-profile integrated plate and spacer device: a clinical and radiological study: Clinical article.前路颈椎间盘切除融合术联合零切迹一体化板和间隔器装置:一项临床和影像学研究:临床文章。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Oct;21(4):529-37. doi: 10.3171/2014.6.SPINE12951. Epub 2014 Aug 8.
4
Outcomes Evaluation of Zero-Profile Devices Compared to Stand-Alone PEEK Cages for the Treatment of Three- and Four-Level Cervical Disc Disease.零轮廓装置与单独使用聚醚醚酮椎间融合器治疗三、四级颈椎间盘疾病的疗效评估
Cureus. 2016 Sep 10;8(9):e775. doi: 10.7759/cureus.775.
5
A comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using self-locking stand-alone polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage with ACDF using cage and plate in the treatment of three-level cervical degenerative spondylopathy: a retrospective study with 2-year follow-up.使用自锁独立聚醚醚酮(PEEK)椎间融合器的颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)与使用椎间融合器和钢板的ACDF治疗三级颈椎退行性脊椎病的比较:一项为期2年随访的回顾性研究
Eur Spine J. 2016 Jul;25(7):2255-62. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4391-x. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
6
Does rigid instrumentation increase the fusion rate in one-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion?在单节段颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术中,使用坚强内固定是否会提高融合率?
Spine J. 2004 Nov-Dec;4(6):636-43. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.04.010.
7
Comparison of a zero-profile anchored spacer (ROI-C) and the polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages with an anterior plate in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy.零轮廓锚定椎间融合器(ROI-C)与聚醚醚酮(PEEK)椎间融合器联合前路钢板用于多节段脊髓型颈椎病前路椎间盘切除融合术的比较。
Eur Spine J. 2016 Jun;25(6):1881-90. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4500-x. Epub 2016 Mar 11.
8
Two-level ACDF with a zero-profile stand-alone spacer compared to conventional plating: a prospective randomized single-center study.零切迹独立型椎间融合器在颈椎前路椎体间融合术(ACDF)中与传统接骨板的对比:一项前瞻性随机单中心研究。
Eur Spine J. 2020 Nov;29(11):2814-2822. doi: 10.1007/s00586-020-06454-z. Epub 2020 May 19.
9
Comparison of allograft to autograft in multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with rigid plate fixation.多级颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术联合刚性钢板固定中同种异体移植与自体移植的比较。
Spine J. 2003 Nov-Dec;3(6):451-9. doi: 10.1016/s1529-9430(03)00173-6.
10
The efficacy of anchored stand-alone spacers in comparison to conventional cage and plate in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials for clinical and radiological outcomes.在颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合手术中,与传统椎间融合器和钢板相比,锚定独立间隔物的疗效:对临床和影像学结果的随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Brain Spine. 2024 Jan 18;4:102748. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2024.102748. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
A retrospective comparative analysis of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using stand-alone titanium cage versus cage and plate fixation in two-level cervical disc herniation.对采用独立钛笼与笼加钢板固定进行两节段颈椎间盘突出症前路椎间盘切除融合术的回顾性比较分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Mar 10;20(1):256. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05654-x.
2
Clinical and radiographic outcomes after index anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with interbody spacer with integrated anchor fixation: a single-surgeon case study.初次前路颈椎间盘切除融合术联合带一体式锚定固定的椎间融合器后的临床及影像学结果:单术者病例研究
J Spine Surg. 2024 Sep 23;10(3):416-427. doi: 10.21037/jss-24-32. Epub 2024 Sep 14.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of radiological outcomes and complications between single-level and multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) by using a polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage-plate fusion system.使用聚醚醚酮(PEEK)椎间融合器-钢板融合系统对单节段和多节段颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)的影像学结果和并发症进行比较。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Feb;98(5):e14277. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014277.
2
Stand-Alone Cervical Cages in 2-Level Anterior Interbody Fusion in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: Results from a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up.独立颈椎椎间融合器用于脊髓型颈椎病双节段前路椎间融合术:至少2年随访结果
Asian Spine J. 2019 Apr;13(2):225-232. doi: 10.31616/asj.2018.0193. Epub 2018 Nov 27.
3
Revision Surgery after Single Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion With Plate vs Stand-Alone Cage over 2 to 5 Year Follow-Up.
单节段颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术使用钢板与单独椎间融合器后的翻修手术:2至5年随访结果
Global Spine J. 2025 May;15(4):2014-2019. doi: 10.1177/21925682241279528. Epub 2024 Aug 27.
4
Zero-profile anchored spacer versus conventional plate-cage construct in bilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.零切迹锁定型椎间融合器与传统钢板-笼式融合器在双节段颈椎前路椎体间融合术中的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Aug 31;18(1):644. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04134-4.
Anterior cervical spine surgery-associated complications in a retrospective case-control study.
一项回顾性病例对照研究中的颈椎前路手术相关并发症
J Spine Surg. 2017 Sep;3(3):444-459. doi: 10.21037/jss.2017.08.03.
4
Comparison of Outcomes for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion With and Without Anterior Plate Fixation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术与前路钢板固定的疗效比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 Apr 1;43(7):E413-E422. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002441.
5
Comparison of Chronic Dysphagia in Standalone versus Conventional Plate and Cage Fusion.独立式与传统钢板及椎间融合器融合治疗慢性吞咽困难的比较
World Neurosurg. 2018 Jan;109:e382-e388. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.09.188. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
6
Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Outcomes over 10 Years: A Prospective Study.10 年以上颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术的结果:一项前瞻性研究。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 Feb 1;43(3):207-214. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002273.
7
Incidence of dysphagia comparing cervical arthroplasty and ACDF.比较颈椎人工关节置换术和颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术吞咽困难的发生率。
SAS J. 2010 Mar 1;4(1):3-8. doi: 10.1016/j.esas.2009.12.001. eCollection 2010.
8
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion associated complications.颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术相关并发症。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Oct 1;32(21):2310-7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318154c57e.
9
Anterior approaches to fusion of the cervical spine: a metaanalysis of fusion rates.颈椎融合的前路手术方法:融合率的荟萃分析
J Neurosurg Spine. 2007 Apr;6(4):298-303. doi: 10.3171/spi.2007.6.4.2.
10
The treatment of certain cervical-spine disorders by anterior removal of the intervertebral disc and interbody fusion.通过前路椎间盘切除和椎间融合治疗某些颈椎疾病。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1958 Jun;40-A(3):607-24.