• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于网络的经动脉化疗栓塞患者教育材料的价值:系统评价

The Value of Web-Based Patient Education Materials on Transarterial Chemoembolization: Systematic Review.

作者信息

Sideris Georgios Antonios, Vyllioti Aikaterini-Themis, Dima Danai, Chill Michael, Njuguna Njogu

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Baystate Medical Center, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Springfield, MA, United States.

School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

JMIR Cancer. 2021 May 7;7(2):e25357. doi: 10.2196/25357.

DOI:10.2196/25357
PMID:33960948
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8140383/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Thousands of web searches are performed related to transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), given its palliative role in the treatment of liver cancer.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to assess the reliability, quality, completeness, readability, understandability, and actionability of websites that provide information on TACE for patients.

METHODS

The five most popular keywords pertaining to TACE were searched on Google, Yahoo, and Bing. General website characteristics and the presence of Health On the Net Foundation code certification were documented. Website assessment was performed using the following scores: DISCERN, Journal of the American Medical Association, Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, Flesch Reading Ease Score, and the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool. A novel TACE content score was generated to evaluate website completeness.

RESULTS

The search yielded 3750 websites. In total, 81 website entities belonging to 78 website domains met the inclusion criteria. A medical disclaimer was not provided on 28% (22/78) of website domains. Health On the Net code certification was present on 12% (9/78) of website domains. Authorship was absent on 88% (71/81) of websites, and sources were absent on 83% (67/81) of websites. The date of publication or of the last update was not listed on 58% (47/81) of websites. The median DISCERN score was 47.0 (IQR 40.5-54.0). The median TACE content score was 35 (IQR 27-43). The median readability grade level was in the 11th grade. Overall, 61% (49/81) and 16% (13/81) of websites were deemed understandable and actionable, respectively. Not-for-profit websites fared significantly better on the Journal of the American Medical Association, DISCERN, and TACE content scores.

CONCLUSIONS

The content referring to TACE that is currently available on the web is unreliable, incomplete, difficult to read, understandable but not actionable, and characterized by low overall quality. Websites need to revise their content to optimally educate consumers and support shared decision-making.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42020202747; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020202747.

摘要

背景

鉴于经动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)在肝癌治疗中的姑息作用,人们进行了数千次与之相关的网络搜索。

目的

本研究旨在评估为患者提供TACE信息的网站的可靠性、质量、完整性、可读性、易懂性和可操作性。

方法

在谷歌、雅虎和必应上搜索与TACE相关的五个最热门关键词。记录网站的一般特征以及是否存在健康网基金会代码认证。使用以下评分进行网站评估:DISCERN评分、美国医学会杂志评分、弗莱什-金凯德年级水平评分、弗莱什阅读简易度评分以及患者教育材料评估工具。生成一个新的TACE内容评分以评估网站的完整性。

结果

搜索共得到3750个网站。总共有属于78个网站域名的81个网站实体符合纳入标准。28%(22/78)的网站域名未提供医学免责声明。12%(9/78)的网站域名有健康网代码认证。88%(71/81)的网站没有作者信息,83%(67/81)的网站没有来源信息。58%(47/81)的网站未列出发布日期或最后更新日期。DISCERN评分的中位数为47.0(四分位间距40.5 - 54.0)。TACE内容评分的中位数为35(四分位间距27 - 43)。可读性年级水平的中位数为11年级。总体而言,分别有61%(49/81)和16%(13/81)的网站被认为是易懂的和可操作的。非营利性网站在美国医学会杂志评分、DISCERN评分和TACE内容评分方面表现明显更好。

结论

目前网络上关于TACE的内容不可靠、不完整、难以阅读、易懂但不可操作,且总体质量较低。网站需要修订其内容,以更好地教育消费者并支持共同决策。

试验注册

国际系统评价前瞻性注册库PROSPERO CRD42020202747;https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020202747 。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e184/8140383/4056c2d6d996/cancer_v7i2e25357_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e184/8140383/b5340c9e63ed/cancer_v7i2e25357_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e184/8140383/ed3a24abc418/cancer_v7i2e25357_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e184/8140383/4056c2d6d996/cancer_v7i2e25357_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e184/8140383/b5340c9e63ed/cancer_v7i2e25357_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e184/8140383/ed3a24abc418/cancer_v7i2e25357_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e184/8140383/4056c2d6d996/cancer_v7i2e25357_fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
The Value of Web-Based Patient Education Materials on Transarterial Chemoembolization: Systematic Review.基于网络的经动脉化疗栓塞患者教育材料的价值:系统评价
JMIR Cancer. 2021 May 7;7(2):e25357. doi: 10.2196/25357.
2
The Readability and Quality of Web-Based Patient Information on Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Quantitative Content Analysis.基于网络的鼻咽癌患者信息的可读性与质量:定量内容分析
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Nov 27;7:e47762. doi: 10.2196/47762.
3
Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure: an assessment of the quality and readability of online information.经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)操作:在线信息质量和可读性的评估。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 May 5;21(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01513-x.
4
A Systematic Evaluation of the Quality, Accuracy, and Reliability of Internet Websites about Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.关于肺动脉高压的互联网网站的质量、准确性和可靠性的系统评价。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2022 Aug;19(8):1404-1413. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202103-325OC.
5
An Evaluation of the Content Quality, Readability, and Reliability of Publicly Available Web-Based Information on Pneumothorax Surgery in Ireland.爱尔兰气胸手术公开网络信息的内容质量、可读性及可靠性评估
Cureus. 2024 Jul 4;16(7):e63800. doi: 10.7759/cureus.63800. eCollection 2024 Jul.
6
Web-Based Patient Educational Material on Osteosarcoma: Quantitative Assessment of Readability and Understandability.基于网络的骨肉瘤患者教育材料:可读性与可理解性的定量评估
JMIR Cancer. 2022 Mar 24;8(1):e25005. doi: 10.2196/25005.
7
Quality and readability of online health information on menopausal hormone therapy in Canada: what are our patients reading?加拿大更年期激素疗法在线健康信息的质量与可读性:我们的患者在阅读什么?
Menopause. 2021 Dec 13;29(1):54-62. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000001881.
8
Quality of Web-Based Sickle Cell Disease Resources for Health Care Transition: Website Content Analysis.用于医疗保健过渡的镰状细胞病网络资源质量:网站内容分析
JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2023 Dec 13;6:e48924. doi: 10.2196/48924.
9
Quality Assessment of Online Resources for Thoracic Outlet Syndrome Patients.胸廓出口综合征患者在线资源的质量评估
Ann Vasc Surg. 2022 Sep;85:96-104. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2022.04.009. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
10
The quality, understandability, readability, and popularity of online educational materials for heart murmur.心脏杂音在线教育资料的质量、易懂性、可理解性和普及性。
Cardiol Young. 2020 Mar;30(3):328-336. doi: 10.1017/S104795111900307X. Epub 2019 Dec 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Characterizing the content and quality of internet resources on exercise training in Ehlers-Danlos Syndromes and generalized hypermobility spectrum disorder.表征埃勒斯-当洛综合征和广泛性关节过度活动综合征运动训练相关网络资源的内容与质量。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 26;20(6):e0325709. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325709. eCollection 2025.
2
Both English- and Spanish-Language Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Online Patient Education Materials Are Written at Higher-Than-Recommended Reading Levels.英文和西班牙文的前交叉韧带重建在线患者教育材料的写作水平高于推荐水平。
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2024 Jul 26;6(6):100982. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2024.100982. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Pelvic vein embolization: an assessment of the readability and quality of online information for patients.盆腔静脉栓塞术:对患者在线信息可读性和质量的评估
CVIR Endovasc. 2020 Oct 18;3(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s42155-020-00143-0.
2
The Association Between Health Information Seeking on the Internet and Physician Visits (The Seventh Tromsø Study - Part 4): Population-Based Questionnaire Study.互联网健康信息搜索与就医之间的关联(第七次特罗姆瑟研究 - 第4部分):基于人群的问卷调查研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Mar 5;22(3):e13120. doi: 10.2196/13120.
3
Systematic review of online patient resources to support shared decision making for bariatric surgery.
Nurse-led support impact via a mobile app for breast cancer patients after surgery: a quasi-experimental study (step 2).
护士主导的支持通过手机应用程序对手术后乳腺癌患者的影响:一项准实验研究(第 2 步)。
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Aug 20;32(9):598. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08819-2.
4
Assessment of freely available online videos of cardiac electrophysiological procedures from a shared decision-making perspective.从共同决策的角度评估心脏电生理手术的免费在线视频
Cardiovasc Digit Health J. 2022 Jul 15;3(4):189-196. doi: 10.1016/j.cvdhj.2022.06.003. eCollection 2022 Aug.
系统评价在线患者资源以支持肥胖症手术的共同决策。
Int J Surg. 2020 Feb;74:34-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.12.021. Epub 2019 Dec 26.
4
Online Information About Periviable Birth: Quality Assessment.关于可存活孕周前出生的在线信息:质量评估
JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2019 Jun 7;2(1):e12524. doi: 10.2196/12524.
5
Varicocele Embolization: An Assessment of the Quality and Readability of Online Patient Information.精索静脉曲张栓塞术:在线患者信息质量和可读性评估。
Acad Radiol. 2020 Jun;27(6):841-846. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2019.08.005. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
6
Credibility, Accuracy, and Comprehensiveness of Internet-Based Information About Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review.基于互联网的下腰痛信息的可信度、准确性和全面性:一项系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 May 7;21(5):e13357. doi: 10.2196/13357.
7
Evaluating the Quality of Health Information in a Changing Digital Ecosystem.评估不断变化的数字生态系统中的健康信息质量。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Feb 8;21(2):e11129. doi: 10.2196/11129.
8
Reliability of Cancer Treatment Information on the Internet: Observational Study.互联网上癌症治疗信息的可靠性:观察性研究。
JMIR Cancer. 2018 Dec 17;4(2):e10031. doi: 10.2196/10031.
9
Who We Are and What We Can Become: The Anthropology of IR and Challenges of Forming a New Specialty.我们是谁以及我们能成为什么:国际关系的人类学与形成新专业的挑战。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2018 Dec;29(12):1703-1704.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2018.07.021.
10
Health education helps to relieve postembolization pain during hepatic arterial chemoembolization therapy.健康教育有助于缓解肝动脉化疗栓塞治疗期间的栓塞后疼痛。
J Pain Res. 2018 Sep 28;11:2115-2121. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S166333. eCollection 2018.