• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较多发肿瘤患者的放射组学特征聚合方法。

Comparison of radiomic feature aggregation methods for patients with multiple tumors.

机构信息

Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, USA.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2021 May 7;11(1):9758. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-89114-6.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-021-89114-6
PMID:33963236
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8105371/
Abstract

Radiomic feature analysis has been shown to be effective at analyzing diagnostic images to model cancer outcomes. It has not yet been established how to best combine radiomic features in cancer patients with multifocal tumors. As the number of patients with multifocal metastatic cancer continues to rise, there is a need for improving personalized patient-level prognosis to better inform treatment. We compared six mathematical methods of combining radiomic features of 3,596 tumors in 831 patients with multiple brain metastases and evaluated the performance of these aggregation methods using three survival models: a standard Cox proportional hazards model, a Cox proportional hazards model with LASSO regression, and a random survival forest. Across all three survival models, the weighted average of the largest three metastases had the highest concordance index (95% confidence interval) of 0.627 (0.595-0.661) for the Cox proportional hazards model, 0.628 (0.591-0.666) for the Cox proportional hazards model with LASSO regression, and 0.652 (0.565-0.727) for the random survival forest model. This finding was consistent when evaluating patients with different numbers of brain metastases and different tumor volumes. Radiomic features can be effectively combined to estimate patient-level outcomes in patients with multifocal brain metastases. Future studies are needed to confirm that the volume-weighted average of the largest three tumors is an effective method for combining radiomic features across other imaging modalities and tumor types.

摘要

放射组学特征分析已被证明可有效分析诊断图像以建立癌症预后模型。但目前尚不清楚如何将具有多灶性肿瘤的癌症患者的放射组学特征最佳地结合起来。随着具有多灶性转移性癌症的患者数量不断增加,需要改善对患者个体水平预后的预测,以便更好地为治疗提供信息。我们比较了 831 名多发性脑转移患者的 3596 个肿瘤的 6 种数学特征组合方法,并使用 3 种生存模型评估了这些聚合方法的性能:标准 Cox 比例风险模型、具有 LASSO 回归的 Cox 比例风险模型和随机生存森林。在所有三种生存模型中,最大的三个转移灶的加权平均值在 Cox 比例风险模型中的一致性指数(95%置信区间)最高,为 0.627(0.595-0.661),在 Cox 比例风险模型与 LASSO 回归模型中为 0.628(0.591-0.666),在随机生存森林模型中为 0.652(0.565-0.727)。当评估具有不同数量脑转移灶和不同肿瘤体积的患者时,这种发现是一致的。放射组学特征可以有效地结合起来,以估计具有多灶性脑转移的患者的个体水平结局。需要进一步的研究来证实,对最大的三个肿瘤的体积加权平均值是在其他成像方式和肿瘤类型中组合放射组学特征的有效方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a6d/8105371/b19dc6e3c787/41598_2021_89114_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a6d/8105371/b19dc6e3c787/41598_2021_89114_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a6d/8105371/b19dc6e3c787/41598_2021_89114_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of radiomic feature aggregation methods for patients with multiple tumors.比较多发肿瘤患者的放射组学特征聚合方法。
Sci Rep. 2021 May 7;11(1):9758. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-89114-6.
2
Comparison of Radiomic Feature Aggregation Methods for Patients with Multiple Tumors.多肿瘤患者的放射组学特征聚合方法比较
medRxiv. 2020 Nov 6:2020.11.04.20226159. doi: 10.1101/2020.11.04.20226159.
3
Radiomics as prognostic factor in brain metastases treated with Gamma Knife radiosurgery.伽玛刀放射外科治疗脑转移瘤的放射组学预后因素分析。
J Neurooncol. 2020 Feb;146(3):439-449. doi: 10.1007/s11060-019-03343-4. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
4
Predicting local failure of brain metastases after stereotactic radiosurgery with radiomics on planning MR images and dose maps.利用计划磁共振图像和剂量图上的放射组学预测立体定向放射治疗后脑转移瘤的局部失败情况。
Med Phys. 2021 Sep;48(9):5522-5530. doi: 10.1002/mp.15110. Epub 2021 Jul 31.
5
Brain metastases from NSCLC treated with stereotactic radiotherapy: prediction mismatch between two different radiomic platforms.非小细胞肺癌脑转移患者采用立体定向放疗治疗:两种不同影像组学平台之间的预测不匹配。
Radiother Oncol. 2023 Jan;178:109424. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.11.013. Epub 2022 Nov 24.
6
MRI radiomic features are associated with survival in melanoma brain metastases treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.MRI 放射组学特征与免疫检查点抑制剂治疗的黑色素瘤脑转移患者的生存相关。
Neuro Oncol. 2019 Dec 17;21(12):1578-1586. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noz141.
7
Machine learning-based radiomic, clinical and semantic feature analysis for predicting overall survival and MGMT promoter methylation status in patients with glioblastoma.基于机器学习的放射组学、临床和语义特征分析预测胶质母细胞瘤患者的总生存期和 MGMT 启动子甲基化状态。
Magn Reson Imaging. 2020 Dec;74:161-170. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2020.09.017. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
8
Radiomic prediction of mutation status based on MR imaging of lung cancer brain metastases.基于肺癌脑转移磁共振成像的突变状态放射组学预测
Magn Reson Imaging. 2020 Jun;69:49-56. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2020.03.002. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
9
A predictive model for distinguishing radiation necrosis from tumour progression after gamma knife radiosurgery based on radiomic features from MR images.基于 MR 图像的放射组学特征,建立伽玛刀放射外科治疗后鉴别放射性坏死与肿瘤进展的预测模型。
Eur Radiol. 2018 Jun;28(6):2255-2263. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-5154-8. Epub 2017 Nov 24.
10
Analysis of heterogeneity of peritumoral T2 hyperintensity in patients with pretreatment glioblastoma: Prognostic value of MRI-based radiomics.术前胶质母细胞瘤患者瘤周 T2 高信号异质性分析:基于 MRI 的放射组学的预后价值。
Eur J Radiol. 2019 Nov;120:108642. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.108642. Epub 2019 Sep 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimizing anisotropic margins in single-isocenter multiple brain metastases radiosurgery using regressor strategies: A multi-institutional validation study.使用回归策略优化单中心多脑转移瘤放射外科治疗中的各向异性边缘:一项多机构验证研究。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2025 Sep;26(9):e70249. doi: 10.1002/acm2.70249.
2
Imaging-derived biomarkers from Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT scans to predict survival of patients with neuroendocrine tumors after PRRT with Lu-DOTATATE.来自镓-多柔比星PET/CT扫描的影像衍生生物标志物,用于预测接受镥-多柔比星肽受体放射性核素治疗后神经内分泌肿瘤患者的生存期。
Cancer Imaging. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s40644-025-00899-5.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Identification of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Sensitive to Systemic Cancer Therapies Using Radiomics.基于放射组学识别对全身系统治疗敏感的非小细胞肺癌。
Clin Cancer Res. 2020 May 1;26(9):2151-2162. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-2942. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
2
Radiomics Response Signature for Identification of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Sensitive to Therapies Targeting EGFR Pathway.放射组学反应特征可识别对靶向 EGFR 通路治疗敏感的转移性结直肠癌。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2020 Sep 1;112(9):902-912. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djaa017.
3
Multicenter study demonstrates radiomic features derived from magnetic resonance perfusion images identify pseudoprogression in glioblastoma.
Emerging Trends in Artificial Intelligence in Neuro-Oncology.
神经肿瘤学中人工智能的新趋势
Curr Oncol Rep. 2025 Jun 12. doi: 10.1007/s11912-025-01688-w.
4
Radiomic-based approaches in the multi-metastatic setting: a quantitative review.多转移情况下基于影像组学的方法:定量综述。
BMC Cancer. 2025 Mar 25;25(1):538. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-13850-5.
5
Evaluating the prognostic value of radiomics and clinical features in metastatic prostate cancer using [Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT.使用[镓]镓-PSMA-11 PET/CT评估影像组学和临床特征在转移性前列腺癌中的预后价值。
Phys Eng Sci Med. 2025 Mar;48(1):329-341. doi: 10.1007/s13246-024-01516-8. Epub 2025 Jan 9.
6
Radiomics analysis of baseline computed tomography to predict oncological outcomes in patients treated for resectable colorectal cancer liver metastasis.基于基线 CT 的影像组学分析预测可切除结直肠癌肝转移患者的肿瘤学结局。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 11;19(9):e0307815. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307815. eCollection 2024.
7
Radiomic-Based Approaches in the Multi-metastatic Setting: A Quantitative Review.多转移灶情况下基于影像组学的方法:定量综述
medRxiv. 2024 Jul 5:2024.07.04.24309964. doi: 10.1101/2024.07.04.24309964.
8
Review on radiomic analysis in F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for prediction of melanoma outcomes.F-氟代脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描的放射组学分析在预测黑色素瘤结局中的研究进展。
Cancer Imaging. 2024 Jul 5;24(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s40644-024-00732-5.
9
Radiomic-based prediction of lesion-specific systemic treatment response in metastatic disease.基于放射组学的转移性疾病中特定病变的全身性治疗反应预测。
Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2024 Sep;116:102413. doi: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2024.102413. Epub 2024 Jun 25.
10
Classification of multiple primary lung cancer in patients with multifocal lung cancer: assessment of a machine learning approach using multidimensional genomic data.多灶性肺癌患者中多原发性肺癌的分类:使用多维基因组数据的机器学习方法评估
Front Oncol. 2024 May 3;14:1388575. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1388575. eCollection 2024.
多中心研究表明,基于磁共振灌注成像的放射组学特征可识别胶质母细胞瘤的假性进展。
Nat Commun. 2019 Jul 18;10(1):3170. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11007-0.
4
Computed Tomography-based Radiomics for Risk Stratification in Prostate Cancer.基于计算机断层扫描的影像组学在前列腺癌风险分层中的应用。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Oct 1;105(2):448-456. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.06.2504. Epub 2019 Jun 26.
5
Radiomics of Brain MRI: Utility in Prediction of Metastatic Tumor Type.脑 MRI 影像组学:预测转移性肿瘤类型的效用。
Radiology. 2019 Feb;290(2):479-487. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018180946. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
6
Deep learning for lung cancer prognostication: A retrospective multi-cohort radiomics study.深度学习在肺癌预后预测中的应用:一项回顾性多队列放射组学研究。
PLoS Med. 2018 Nov 30;15(11):e1002711. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002711. eCollection 2018 Nov.
7
Radiomics Signature on Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Association with Disease-Free Survival in Patients with Invasive Breast Cancer.磁共振成像放射组学特征与浸润性乳腺癌患者无病生存的相关性。
Clin Cancer Res. 2018 Oct 1;24(19):4705-4714. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-3783. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
8
Computational Radiomics System to Decode the Radiographic Phenotype.用于解码影像学表型的计算放射组学系统
Cancer Res. 2017 Nov 1;77(21):e104-e107. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-0339.
9
Radiomic subtyping improves disease stratification beyond key molecular, clinical, and standard imaging characteristics in patients with glioblastoma.基于影像组学的亚型分类能改善胶质母细胞瘤患者的疾病分层,超越关键的分子、临床和标准影像特征。
Neuro Oncol. 2018 May 18;20(6):848-857. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nox188.
10
Radiomics: the bridge between medical imaging and personalized medicine.放射组学:医学影像与个性化医疗之间的桥梁。
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec;14(12):749-762. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.141. Epub 2017 Oct 4.