Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Surg Endosc. 2022 Apr;36(4):2382-2392. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08519-6. Epub 2021 May 7.
To review the recently available interventions to achieve optimal visual clarity in laparoscopic abdominopelvic surgery compared to conventional cleaning alternatives. Currently, there is no consensus on the most effective method for the cleaning of endoscopic lenses used in minimally invasive abdominopelvic surgery.
Literature searching for articles relevant to answering a predefined research question was performed in December 2019 and involved searching of the electronic databases of MEDLINE, the Cochrane Registry, and EMBASE. Basic search terms were derived using the PICO (population, intervention, comparator and outcomes) framework and through a scoping search of literature via MEDLINE. A manual search of Google Scholar and citation screening of eligible studies was also performed to ensure the identification and inclusion of all pertinent studies to address the research question.
Among conventional and readily available methods, the most effective approaches involved heated sterile water, heating of laparoscope lenses, and surfactant solutions, including FRED and Ultra-Stop, while evaluations of all novel devices and methods were more effective than controls, which included lens wiping systems and air and carbon dioxide flow systems. While the former surgical techniques were consistently associated with superior lens cleaning ability and/or defogging capability and subsequent optical clarity of images within the surgical field, no methods conferred any meaningful effects upon other clinically important outcomes, such as operative time, costs, complication rates and length of stay, suggesting that decision making concerning the selection of lens cleaning method/device should suit the preferences of the instrument operator and/or the responsible surgeon.
We demonstrated that a range of endoscopic lens cleaning methods and devices can be used to achieve sufficient optical clarity of the laparoscopic surgical field through either preventing lenses from fogging and/or facilitating the inter-operative cleaning of fouled lenses. Despite the various methods evaluated in this review, there were no significant differences in complication rates between the intervention and control groups.
与传统的清洁方法相比,回顾最近可用于实现腹腔镜腹部和盆腔手术最佳视觉清晰度的干预措施。目前,对于微创腹部和盆腔手术中使用的内窥镜镜头的清洁,尚无关于最有效方法的共识。
2019 年 12 月,针对一个预先设定的研究问题进行了文献检索,检索范围包括 MEDLINE、Cochrane 注册库和 EMBASE 电子数据库。基本搜索词是使用 PICO(人群、干预、对照和结果)框架和通过 MEDLINE 进行文献范围搜索得出的。还进行了 Google Scholar 的手动搜索和合格研究的引文筛选,以确保确定并纳入所有与研究问题相关的研究。
在常规和现成的方法中,最有效的方法包括加热的无菌水、腹腔镜镜头加热和表面活性剂溶液,包括 FRED 和 Ultra-Stop,而所有新型设备和方法的评估结果均优于对照组,对照组包括镜头擦拭系统和空气和二氧化碳流动系统。虽然前者的外科技术始终与更好的镜头清洁能力和/或除雾能力以及随后的手术视野内图像的光学清晰度相关,但没有任何方法对其他重要的临床结果(如手术时间、成本、并发症发生率和住院时间)产生任何有意义的影响,这表明关于镜头清洁方法/设备选择的决策应该符合器械操作人员和/或负责外科医生的偏好。
我们证明,通过防止镜头起雾和/或便于术中清洁污染的镜头,一系列内窥镜镜头清洁方法和设备可用于实现腹腔镜手术视野的足够光学清晰度。尽管本综述评估了各种方法,但干预组和对照组之间的并发症发生率没有显着差异。