Department of Microbiology, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia; School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Department of Civil Engineering, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Lancet Planet Health. 2021 May;5(5):e297-e308. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(21)00051-6.
Multiple bacteria, viruses, protists, and helminths cause enteric infections that greatly impact human health and wellbeing. These enteropathogens are transmited via several pathways through human, animal, and environmental reservoirs. Individual qPCR assays have been extensively used to detect enteropathogens within these types of samples, whereas the TaqMan array card (TAC), which allows simultaneous detection of multiple enteropathogens, has only previously been validated in human clinical samples.
In this methodological comparison study, we compared the performance of a custom 48-singleplex TAC relative to standard qPCR. We established the sensitivity and specificity of each method for the detection of eight enteric targets, by using spiked samples with varying levels of PCR inhibition. We then tested the prevalence and abundance of pathogens in wastewater from Melbourne (Australia), and human, animal, and environmental samples from informal settlements in Suva, Fiji using both TAC and qPCR.
Both methods exhibited similarly h specificity (TAC 100%, qPCR 94%), sensitivity (TAC 92%, qPCR 100%), and quantitation accuracy (TAC 91%, qPCR 99%) in non-inhibited sample matrices with spiked gene fragments. PCR inhibitors substantially affected detection via TAC, though this issue was alleviated by ten-fold sample dilution. Among samples from informal settlements, the two techniques performed similarly for detection (89% agreement) and quantitation (R 0·82) for the eight enteropathogen targets. The TAC additionally included 38 other enteric targets, enabling detection of diverse faecal pathogens and extensive environmental contamination that would be prohibitively labour intensive to assay by standard qPCR.
The two techniques produced similar results across diverse sample types, with qPCR prioritising greater sensitivity and quantitation accuracy, and TAC trading small reductions in these for a cost-effective larger enteropathogen panel enabling a greater number of enteric pathogens to be analysed concurrently, which is beneficial given the abundance and variety of enteric pathogens in environments such as urban informal settlements. The ability to monitor multiple enteric pathogens across diverse reservoirs could allow better resolution of pathogen exposure pathways, and the design and monitoring of interventions to reduce pathogen load.
Wellcome Trust Our Planet, Our Health programme.
多种细菌、病毒、原生动物和寄生虫会引起肠道感染,极大地影响人类健康和福祉。这些肠道病原体通过人类、动物和环境储库中的多种途径传播。个体 qPCR 检测已广泛用于检测这些类型样本中的肠道病原体,而 TaqMan 阵列卡(TAC)可同时检测多种肠道病原体,此前仅在人类临床样本中得到验证。
在这项方法比较研究中,我们比较了定制的 48 个单重 TAC 与标准 qPCR 的性能。我们通过使用具有不同 PCR 抑制水平的加标样本,确定了每种方法检测 8 种肠道靶标的灵敏度和特异性。然后,我们使用 TAC 和 qPCR 检测了来自澳大利亚墨尔本的废水以及斐济苏瓦非正规住区的人类、动物和环境样本中的病原体流行率和丰度。
在非抑制性样本基质中,两种方法对加标基因片段的特异性(TAC 为 100%,qPCR 为 94%)、灵敏度(TAC 为 92%,qPCR 为 100%)和定量准确性(TAC 为 91%,qPCR 为 99%)均表现出相似性。PCR 抑制剂会显著影响 TAC 的检测,但通过十倍稀释可以缓解这个问题。在非正规住区样本中,两种技术在检测(89%的一致性)和定量(R 0.82)方面对 8 种肠道病原体靶标表现出相似性。TAC 还包括 38 种其他肠道病原体,能够检测到多种粪便病原体和广泛的环境污染,这在通过标准 qPCR 进行检测时将是非常耗费劳力的。
两种技术在不同类型的样本中产生了相似的结果,qPCR 优先考虑更高的灵敏度和定量准确性,而 TAC 则以较小的牺牲换取了更具成本效益的更大肠道病原体面板,从而能够同时分析更多的肠道病原体,这在城市非正规住区等环境中存在大量和多样化的肠道病原体时是有益的。能够监测多种肠道病原体在不同储库中的情况,可以更好地确定病原体暴露途径,并设计和监测干预措施以减少病原体负荷。
惠康信托我们的星球,我们的健康计划。