School of Psychological Science, University of Western Australia, Australia; Department of Psychology, University of Virginia, Virginia, United States.
School of Engineering, University of Virginia, Virginia, United States.
Behav Res Ther. 2021 Jul;142:103864. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2021.103864. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
The present study assessed target engagement, preliminary efficacy, and feasibility as primary outcomes of a free multi-session online cognitive bias modification of interpretation (CBM-I) intervention for anxiety in a large community sample. High trait anxious participants (N = 807) were randomly assigned to a CBM-I condition: 1) Positive training (90% positive-10% negative); 2) 50% positive-50% negative training; or 3) no-training control. Further, half of each CBM-I condition was randomized to either an anxious imagery prime or a neutral imagery prime. Due to attrition, results from six out of eight sessions were analyzed using structural equation modeling of latent growth curves. Results for the intent-to-treat sample indicate that for target engagement, consistent with predictions, decreases in negative interpretations over time were significantly greater among those receiving positive CBM-I training compared to no-training or 50-50 training, and vice-versa for increases in positive interpretations. For intervention efficacy, the decrease in anxiety symptoms over time was significantly greater among those receiving positive CBM-I training compared to no-training. Interaction effects with imagery prime were more variable with a general pattern of stronger results for those completing the anxious imagery prime. Findings indicate that online CBM-I positive training is feasible and shows some promising results, although attrition rates were very high for later training sessions.
本研究评估了目标参与、初步疗效和可行性作为主要结果,这是一项针对大型社区样本中焦虑的免费多轮在线认知偏差修正解释(CBM-I)干预的主要结果。高特质焦虑参与者(N=807)被随机分配到 CBM-I 条件:1)积极训练(90%积极-10%消极);2)50%积极-50%消极训练;或 3)无训练对照组。此外,每个 CBM-I 条件的一半被随机分配到焦虑意象启动或中性意象启动。由于流失,使用潜在增长曲线的结构方程模型分析了八个疗程中的六个疗程的结果。意向治疗样本的结果表明,对于目标参与,与预测一致,与无训练或 50-50 训练相比,接受积极 CBM-I 训练的个体随着时间的推移,消极解释的减少明显更大,而积极解释的增加则相反。对于干预效果,与无训练相比,接受积极 CBM-I 训练的个体随着时间的推移,焦虑症状的减少明显更大。与意象启动的交互作用更为多变,对于完成焦虑意象启动的个体,结果更为明显。研究结果表明,在线 CBM-I 积极训练是可行的,并且显示出一些有希望的结果,尽管后期训练课程的流失率非常高。