Carmelli Guy, Watson Erin E, Villarroel Nadia A, Dixon William W, Clarke Samuel O
Department of Emergency Medicine University of Massachusetts Worcester Massachusetts USA.
Department of Emergency Medicine ChristianaCare Health System Newark Delaware USA.
AEM Educ Train. 2021 Apr 30;5(2):e10598. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10598. eCollection 2021 Apr.
Workflow efficiency (WFE) is essential to the practice of emergency medicine (EM), but a standardized approach to measuring and teaching it during residency is lacking. In this study we sought to describe how EM residency programs in the United States currently measure and teach WFE and to assess the relative importance of WFE teaching to EM residency program leaders.
We conducted a cross-sectional survey of all accredited EM residency training programs in the United States in Fall 2019. We invited all allopathic EM residency programs to participate in the study by directly emailing program directors and assistant/associate program directors. We conducted the study and performed descriptive statistics using SurveyMonkey software.
We received a total of 133 responses out of 190 total programs (70%) with proportionate representation from 3- and 4-year programs and all regions of the United States. When asked to what extent teaching efficiency should be a priority compared to other educational goals, 65% of program leaders responded with "significant" or "moderate" priority. Most EM programs collect WFE data on their residents, either by tracking patients per hour (78%) or by written evaluations (59%). Common methods for providing WFE data to residents were: "individual data provided along with deidentified rank" (35%), "data provided only during private feedback meetings" (26%), and "no data or rank provided to residents" (16%). Regarding targeted WFE teaching to residents, 88% reported utilizing general on-shift teaching, 48% reported teaching WFE during formal didactics, and 45% during dedicated private feedback sessions.
This national study of allopathic U.S. EM programs suggests that most EM program leaders do value WFE teaching. However, we found no consistent approach among programs for tracking or distributing resident WFE data, and many programs lack a formalized way to teach efficiency to their residents.
工作流程效率(WFE)对于急诊医学(EM)实践至关重要,但在住院医师培训期间缺乏测量和教授WFE的标准化方法。在本研究中,我们试图描述美国的急诊医学住院医师培训项目目前如何测量和教授WFE,并评估WFE教学对急诊医学住院医师培训项目负责人的相对重要性。
2019年秋季,我们对美国所有经认可的急诊医学住院医师培训项目进行了横断面调查。我们通过直接给项目主任和助理/副主任项目主任发送电子邮件,邀请所有opathic急诊医学住院医师培训项目参与研究。我们使用SurveyMonkey软件进行研究并进行描述性统计。
在总共190个项目中,我们共收到133份回复(70%),3年制和4年制项目以及美国所有地区均有相应比例的代表。当被问及与其他教育目标相比,教学效率应在多大程度上成为优先事项时,65%的项目负责人回答为“重要”或“中等”优先。大多数急诊医学项目通过每小时跟踪患者(78%)或书面评估(59%)来收集住院医师的WFE数据。向住院医师提供WFE数据的常见方法有:“提供与去识别化排名一起的个人数据”(35%)、“仅在私人反馈会议期间提供数据”(26%)以及“不向住院医师提供数据或排名”(16%)。关于针对住院医师的目标WFE教学,88%报告使用一般轮班教学,48%报告在正式教学期间教授WFE,45%在专门的私人反馈会议期间教授。
这项针对美国opathic急诊医学项目的全国性研究表明,大多数急诊医学项目负责人确实重视WFE教学。然而,我们发现各项目在跟踪或分发住院医师WFE数据方面没有一致的方法,而且许多项目缺乏向住院医师教授效率的正式方式。