Suppr超能文献

CaneCPI-5 对牙釉质的安全性和原位抗侵蚀作用。

Safety and In Situ Antierosive Effect of CaneCPI-5 on Dental Enamel.

机构信息

Department of Genetics and Evolution, São Carlos Federal University, São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil.

Department of Biological Sciences, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Bauru, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

J Dent Res. 2021 Nov;100(12):1344-1350. doi: 10.1177/00220345211011590. Epub 2021 May 10.

Abstract

The sugarcane cystatin (CaneCPI-5) was recently cloned and showed strong binding force to dental enamel and protection against initial erosion. However, evaluations on its safety and efficacy in a situation closer to the clinical condition are necessary. In the present study we analyzed 1) the cytotoxicity of CaneCPI-5 on human gingival fibroblasts (HGFs); 2) the ability of CaneCPI-5 to reduce enamel erosion and erosion+abrasion in situ. In part 1, HGFs were treated with CaneCPI-5 (0.025, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5 or 1.0 mg/mL) or no treatment (control). The cytotoxicity was assessed after 60 s and 24 h by mitochondrial activity (MTT), confocal microscopy, and hematoxylin/eosin staining. In part 2, 15 volunteers participated in a double-blind crossover protocol consisting of 3 phases, according to the following treatments: 1) 0.1 mg/mL CaneCPI-5; 2) SnCl/NaF/AmF (Elmex; positive control); 3) water (negative control). The volunteers wore an appliance containing 4 bovine enamel specimens for 5 d. Each day, the specimens were individually treated with 50 µL of the tested solutions per 60 s and then subjected to erosive challenges (0.1% citric acid, pH 2.5, for 90 s, 4 times per day). After the first and last erosive challenge each day, 2 samples were abraded (toothbrushing, 15 s). Enamel wear was measured by contact profilometry. One or two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA)/Tukey's or Sidak's tests ( < 0.05) were applied. Regardless of the concentration and the experimental time, CaneCPI-5 did not decrease the cell viability compared to the negative control ( < 0.05). Erosion+abrasion led to significantly greater wear compared to erosion only. For both conditions, the lowest wear was found for SnCl and CaneCPI-5, which did not differ significantly from each other, but showed significant protection when compared to the negative control. In conclusion, CaneCPI-5 is safe on HGFs and reduces enamel erosive wear to the same extent as a commercial solution used to control erosive tooth wear (ETW).

摘要

甘蔗半胱氨酸蛋白酶抑制剂(CaneCPI-5)最近被克隆,并表现出对牙釉质的强结合力和对初始侵蚀的保护作用。然而,在更接近临床情况的情况下,对其安全性和功效进行评估是必要的。在本研究中,我们分析了 1)CaneCPI-5 对人牙龈成纤维细胞(HGFs)的细胞毒性;2)CaneCPI-5 减少釉质侵蚀和侵蚀+磨损的能力。在第 1 部分中,用 CaneCPI-5(0.025、0.05、0.1、0.5 或 1.0mg/ml)或无处理(对照)处理 HGFs。用线粒体活性(MTT)、共聚焦显微镜和苏木精/伊红染色法在 60s 和 24h 后评估细胞毒性。在第 2 部分,15 名志愿者参与了一项双盲交叉试验,该试验包括 3 个阶段,根据以下治疗方法进行:1)0.1mg/ml CaneCPI-5;2)SnCl/NaF/AmF(Elmex;阳性对照);3)水(阴性对照)。志愿者佩戴一个含有 4 个牛牙釉质标本的装置 5 天。每天,将标本单独用 50µl 测试溶液处理 60s,然后进行侵蚀挑战(0.1%柠檬酸,pH2.5,90s,每天 4 次)。每天第一次和最后一次侵蚀挑战后,对 2 个样本进行磨损(刷牙,15s)。通过接触式轮廓测量法测量牙釉质磨损。应用单因素或双因素方差分析(ANOVA)/Tukey 或 Sidak 检验(<0.05)。无论浓度和实验时间如何,CaneCPI-5 与阴性对照相比均未降低细胞活力(<0.05)。侵蚀+磨损导致的磨损明显大于仅侵蚀。对于两种情况,磨损最低的是 SnCl 和 CaneCPI-5,它们彼此之间没有显著差异,但与阴性对照相比,具有显著的保护作用。总之,CaneCPI-5 对 HGFs 是安全的,并能减少牙釉质侵蚀性磨损,与用于控制侵蚀性牙磨损(ETW)的商业解决方案效果相当。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验