• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2011-2017 年新型分子实体药物用药指南长度和预估可读懂度的两年期分析。

Biennial Analysis of Medication Guide Length and Estimated Readability for New Molecular Entity Drugs, 2011-2017.

机构信息

Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Office of Medical Policy, Office of Medical Policy Initiatives, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Avenue, WO Bldg 51, Third Floor, Silver Spring, MD, 20993, USA.

出版信息

Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2021 Sep;55(5):918-925. doi: 10.1007/s43441-021-00270-3. Epub 2021 May 10.

DOI:10.1007/s43441-021-00270-3
PMID:33970464
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8338801/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A medication guide (MG) is a form of FDA-approved labeling that provides patients with information about certain prescribed drugs so that patients can use these drugs safely and effectively. Given ongoing efforts by FDA and industry to continuously improve MG content and format, we hypothesized that more recently approved MGs for new molecular entities (NMEs) would be shorter and more readable compared to NME MGs approved earlier.

METHODS

We analyzed 53 NME MGs that were either approved in 2011 (n = 16), 2013 (n = 9), 2015 (n = 12), or 2017 (n = 16) to determine whether MG page length, word count, and readability scores differed by year. Readability was estimated by Flesch Reading Ease, Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), Fry graph (FRY), and Gunning's Fog Index (FOG) scores.

RESULTS

Mean page length was significantly lower in 2017 than in 2011 and 2013 (ps < .0001). Mean FKGL scores reflected sentences and words found in 8th grade textbooks, but mean FOG and FRY scores were consistent with sentences and words found in 10th and 11th grade textbooks.

CONCLUSIONS

Although more recent NME MGs were shorter than older NME MGs, additional research is warranted to determine whether shorter MGs lead to improved readability. Developers choosing to estimate MG readability with equations should consider using multiple readability formulas and weigh the strengths and weaknesses of this approach. Using validated tools to more comprehensively assess MG readability should also be considered.

摘要

背景

用药指南(MG)是 FDA 批准的一种标签形式,为患者提供有关特定处方药物的信息,以便患者安全有效地使用这些药物。鉴于 FDA 和行业正在不断努力,持续改进 MG 的内容和格式,我们假设与早期批准的新型分子实体(NME)MG 相比,最近批准的 NME MG 会更简短、更易读。

方法

我们分析了 53 种 NME MG,这些 MG 要么是在 2011 年(n=16)、2013 年(n=9)、2015 年(n=12)或 2017 年(n=16)批准的,以确定 MG 页面长度、字数和可读性评分是否因年份而异。可读性通过 Flesch 阅读容易度、Flesch-Kincaid 年级水平(FKGL)、Fry 图(FRY)和 Gunning 的 Fog 指数(FOG)评分来估计。

结果

2017 年的平均页面长度明显低于 2011 年和 2013 年(p<0.0001)。平均 FKGL 分数反映了 8 年级课本中的句子和单词,但平均 FOG 和 FRY 分数与 10 年级和 11 年级课本中的句子和单词一致。

结论

尽管最近的 NME MG 比旧的 NME MG 更短,但需要进一步研究以确定更短的 MG 是否会导致可读性提高。选择使用方程估计 MG 可读性的开发者应考虑使用多种可读性公式,并权衡此方法的优缺点。还应考虑使用经过验证的工具更全面地评估 MG 的可读性。

相似文献

1
Biennial Analysis of Medication Guide Length and Estimated Readability for New Molecular Entity Drugs, 2011-2017.2011-2017 年新型分子实体药物用药指南长度和预估可读懂度的两年期分析。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2021 Sep;55(5):918-925. doi: 10.1007/s43441-021-00270-3. Epub 2021 May 10.
2
Assessment of online patient education materials from major ophthalmologic associations.主要眼科协会在线患者教育材料评估。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 Apr;133(4):449-54. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.6104.
3
Improving health literacy and stakeholder-directed knowledge of One Health through analysis of readability: a cross sectional infodemiology study.通过可读性分析提高健康素养和利益相关者对“同一健康”的定向知识:一项横断面信息传播流行病学研究
Sci One Health. 2024 Nov 7;3:100088. doi: 10.1016/j.soh.2024.100088. eCollection 2024.
4
The readability of parent information leaflets in paediatric studies.儿科研究中家长信息单张的可读性。
Pediatr Res. 2023 Sep;94(3):1166-1171. doi: 10.1038/s41390-023-02608-z. Epub 2023 Apr 29.
5
The readability of informed consent forms for research studies conducted in South Africa.南非开展的研究性医学临床试验知情同意书的可读性。
S Afr Med J. 2021 Feb 1;111(2):180-183. doi: 10.7196/SAMJ.2021.v111i2.14752.
6
Readability of Patient Education Materials in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (PM&R): A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study.物理医学与康复(PM&R)患者教育材料的可读性:一项比较性横断面研究。
PM R. 2020 Apr;12(4):368-373. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12230. Epub 2019 Sep 18.
7
Improving Biomedical Science Literacy and Patient-Directed Knowledge of Tuberculosis (TB): A Cross-Sectional Infodemiology Study Examining Readability of Patient-Facing TB Information.提高生物医学科学素养和结核病(TB)患者导向知识:一项横断面传染病学研究,调查面向患者的 TB 信息的易读性。
Br J Biomed Sci. 2024 Oct 22;81:13566. doi: 10.3389/bjbs.2024.13566. eCollection 2024.
8
Readability of questionnaires assessing listening difficulties associated with (central) auditory processing disorders.评估与(中枢)听觉处理障碍相关的听力困难的问卷的可读性。
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2013 Jan;44(1):48-60. doi: 10.1044/0161-1461(2012/11-0055). Epub 2012 Oct 16.
9
Cosmetic facial surgery: are online resources reliable and do patients understand them?面部整形手术:在线资源可靠吗?患者能理解这些资源吗?
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Feb;56(2):124-128. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2017.12.011. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
10
Health Literacy: Readability of ACC/AHA Online Patient Education Material.健康素养:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会在线患者教育资料的可读性
Cardiology. 2017;138(1):36-40. doi: 10.1159/000475881. Epub 2017 Jun 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Differences in perceived difficulty in print and online patient education materials.纸质版和在线患者教育材料在感知难度上的差异。
Perm J. 2014 Fall;18(4):45-50. doi: 10.7812/TPP/14-008.