Suppr超能文献

关于新冠病毒自愿和强制接种疫苗的态度:来自德国的证据。

Attitudes on voluntary and mandatory vaccination against COVID-19: Evidence from Germany.

作者信息

Graeber Daniel, Schmidt-Petri Christoph, Schröder Carsten

机构信息

DIW Berlin / SOEP, Berlin, Germany.

Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 May 10;16(5):e0248372. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248372. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Several vaccines against COVID-19 have now been developed and are already being rolled out around the world. The decision whether or not to get vaccinated has so far been left to the individual citizens. However, there are good reasons, both in theory as well as in practice, to believe that the willingness to get vaccinated might not be sufficiently high to achieve herd immunity. A policy of mandatory vaccination could ensure high levels of vaccination coverage, but its legitimacy is doubtful. We investigate the willingness to get vaccinated and the reasons for an acceptance (or rejection) of a policy of mandatory vaccination against COVID-19 in June and July 2020 in Germany based on a representative real time survey, a random sub-sample (SOEP-CoV) of the German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP). Our results show that about 70 percent of adults in Germany would voluntarily get vaccinated against the coronavirus if a vaccine without side effects was available. About half of residents of Germany are in favor, and half against, a policy of mandatory vaccination. The approval rate for mandatory vaccination is significantly higher among those who would get vaccinated voluntarily (around 60 percent) than among those who would not get vaccinated voluntarily (27 percent). The individual willingness to get vaccinated and acceptance of a policy of mandatory vaccination correlates systematically with socio-demographic and psychological characteristics of the respondents. We conclude that as far as people's declared intentions are concerned, herd immunity could be reached without a policy of mandatory vaccination, but that such a policy might be found acceptable too, were it to become necessary.

摘要

目前已经研发出几种针对新冠病毒的疫苗,并且正在全球范围内推广。到目前为止,是否接种疫苗的决定一直由公民个人自行做出。然而,无论是在理论上还是在实践中,都有充分的理由相信,接种疫苗的意愿可能不足以达到群体免疫所需的高度。强制接种政策可以确保高接种率,但其合法性令人怀疑。我们基于德国社会经济面板(SOEP)的代表性实时调查——随机子样本(SOEP-CoV),调查了2020年6月和7月德国民众接种疫苗的意愿以及接受(或拒绝)新冠病毒强制接种政策的原因。我们的结果显示,如果有不含副作用的疫苗,德国约70%的成年人会自愿接种新冠疫苗。德国约一半居民赞成强制接种政策,另一半反对。在自愿接种者中,强制接种政策的批准率显著更高(约60%),而在非自愿接种者中这一比例为27%。个人接种疫苗的意愿以及对强制接种政策的接受程度与受访者的社会人口统计学和心理特征存在系统性关联。我们得出结论,就人们宣称的意图而言,即使没有强制接种政策也可能实现群体免疫,但如果有必要,这样的政策也可能被认为是可以接受的。

相似文献

8
Willingness of Greek general population to get a COVID-19 vaccine.希腊民众接种 COVID-19 疫苗的意愿。
Glob Health Res Policy. 2021 Jan 29;6(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s41256-021-00188-1.
9
Attitudes Toward Mandatory COVID-19 Vaccination in Germany.德国民众对强制性 COVID-19 疫苗接种的态度。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2022 May 13;119(19):335-341. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.m2022.0174.

引用本文的文献

7
Short-term and long-term behavioral effects of vaccination mandates.疫苗接种强制令的短期和长期行为影响。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2023 Dec 15;19(3):2294525. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2294525. Epub 2023 Dec 19.

本文引用的文献

5
Correlates and disparities of intention to vaccinate against COVID-19.新冠疫苗接种意愿的相关因素与差异
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Mar;272:113638. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113638. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
6
Good reasons to vaccinate: mandatory or payment for risk?有充分理由接种疫苗:强制接种还是为风险付费?
J Med Ethics. 2021 Feb;47(2):78-85. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106821. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
9
Contingent assessment of the COVID-19 vaccine.COVID-19 疫苗的有条件评估。
Vaccine. 2020 Jul 22;38(34):5424-5429. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.06.068. Epub 2020 Jun 25.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验