School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences of the University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Department of Community Health, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
PLoS One. 2021 May 12;16(5):e0251472. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251472. eCollection 2021.
Within the context of universal health coverage (UHC), South Africa has embarked on a series of health sector reforms. The implementation of the Ideal Clinic Realisation and Maintenance (ICRM) programme is a major UHC reform. Cooperative governance is enshrined in South Africa's Constitution, with health a concurrent competency of national and provincial government. Hence, effective inter-governmental relations (IGR) are essential for the ICRM programme implementation.
The aim of the study was to measure the cohesion of IGR, specifically consultation, support and information sharing, across national, provincial and local government health departments in the ICRM programme implementation.
Using Provan and Milward's theory on network effectiveness, this study was a whole network design social network analysis (SNA). The study was conducted in two districts in Gauteng (GP) and Mpumalanga (MP) provinces of South Africa. Following informed consent, we used both an interview schedule and a network matrix to collect the social network data from health policy actors in national, provincial and local government. We used UCINET version 6.619 to analyse the SNA data for the overall network cohesion and cohesion within and between the government spheres.
The social network analysis revealed non-cohesive relationships between the different spheres of government. In both provinces, there was poor consultation in the ICRM programme implementation, illustrated by the low densities of seeking advice (GP = 15.6%; MP = 24.4%) and providing advice (GP = 14.1%; MP = 25.1%). The most cohesive relationships existed within the National Department of Health (density = 66.7%), suggesting that national policy actors sought advice from one another, rather than from the provincial health departments. A density of 2.1% in GP, and 12.5% in MP illustrated the latter.
The non-cohesive relationships amongst policy actors across government spheres should be addressed in order to realise the benefits of cooperative governance in implementing the ICRM programme.
在全民健康覆盖(UHC)的背景下,南非已经启动了一系列卫生部门改革。理想诊所实现和维持(ICRM)计划的实施是 UHC 的一项重大改革。合作治理是南非宪法所确立的,卫生是国家和省政府的共同职责。因此,有效的政府间关系(IGR)对于 ICRM 计划的实施至关重要。
本研究旨在衡量 IGR 的凝聚力,特别是在 ICRM 计划实施过程中国家、省和地方政府卫生部门之间的协商、支持和信息共享。
本研究采用 Provan 和 Milward 的网络有效性理论,采用整体网络设计的社会网络分析(SNA)。研究在南非豪登省(GP)和姆普马兰加省(MP)的两个地区进行。在获得知情同意后,我们使用访谈提纲和网络矩阵从国家、省和地方政府的卫生政策参与者那里收集社会网络数据。我们使用 UCINET 版本 6.619 分析 SNA 数据,以了解整个网络的凝聚力以及政府各部门内部和之间的凝聚力。
社会网络分析显示,不同政府部门之间的关系不紧密。在两省,ICRM 计划实施中的协商情况不佳,表现为寻求建议的密度较低(GP = 15.6%;MP = 24.4%)和提供建议的密度较低(GP = 14.1%;MP = 25.1%)。国家卫生部之间的关系最为紧密(密度=66.7%),表明国家政策制定者彼此之间寻求建议,而不是向省级卫生部门寻求建议。在 GP 中密度为 2.1%,在 MP 中密度为 12.5%,说明了这一点。
应解决政府各部门政策制定者之间不紧密的关系,以实现合作治理在实施 ICRM 计划中的效益。