Department of Mathematical Demography and Statistics, International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400088, India.
Department of Population Policies and Programs, International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400088, India.
BMC Geriatr. 2021 May 12;21(1):304. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02256-0.
The status of household headship accorded to the older members of the family is often symbolic and seldom vested with some control over resources. The increased dependency and diminished ability to contribute to household economy are major factors that lead to a decline in the respect accorded to older people and their status in the family. The present study aimed to understand the distinction between the functional and nominal household headship status of older adults based on their decision-making power and examine how it is associated with their subjective well-being.
The present research used data from the 'Building a Knowledge Base on Population Aging in India' (BKPAI) which is nationally representative. The survey was conducted in 2011, across seven states of India. Descriptive statistics along with percentage distribution were calculated for subjective well-being over explanatory variables. For finding the association between subjective well-being over explanatory variables, binary logistic regression model was used.
The mean age of the study population was 68 years [CI: 67.8-68.2]. About 5 % of older adults had nominal while 95% had functional headship status. The prevalence of low subjective well-being (LSWB) was significantly higher among older adults with nominal headship status (58%) than functional headship status (23%). After controlling for several other variables, older adults with nominal headship status were 59% significantly more likely to have low subjective well-being than individuals with functional headship status (OR = 1.59; 95% CI: 1.10, 2.31). Further, older adults with psychological distress, chronic morbidity, poor self-reported health, no community involvement and no one to trust on were at higher risk of LSWB than their counterparts.
Findings suggest that older adults who do not have a household headship with power with active participation in household decision-making as well as those who have no involvement in social activities or have poor health conditions need to be given more attention. Thus, to keep a large proportion of older population gainfully engaged, their care and support should be ensured via providing appropriate services that would enhance their roles and responsibilities and overall wellbeing.
家庭中老年人的户主地位往往是象征性的,很少赋予他们对资源的一些控制权。老年人日益依赖和减少对家庭经济的贡献,是导致他们受到的尊重减少和家庭地位下降的主要因素。本研究旨在了解基于决策权的老年人的功能和名义户主地位之间的区别,并探讨其与主观幸福感的关系。
本研究使用了具有全国代表性的“印度人口老龄化知识库建设”(BKPAI)的数据。该调查于 2011 年在印度的七个邦进行。针对主观幸福感,对解释变量进行了描述性统计和百分比分布。为了发现主观幸福感与解释变量之间的关系,使用了二元逻辑回归模型。
研究人群的平均年龄为 68 岁[置信区间:67.8-68.2]。约 5%的老年人名义上是户主,而 95%是功能上的户主。名义户主地位的老年人中低主观幸福感(LSWB)的患病率(58%)明显高于功能户主地位的老年人(23%)。在控制了其他几个变量后,名义户主地位的老年人比有功能户主地位的老年人更有可能出现低主观幸福感,其比值比(OR)为 59%[95%置信区间(CI):1.10-2.31]。此外,与同龄人相比,有心理困扰、慢性发病、自我报告健康状况差、无社区参与和无人可信赖的老年人,发生 LSWB 的风险更高。
研究结果表明,那些没有实权的名义户主地位的老年人,以及那些没有参与社会活动或健康状况不佳的老年人,需要给予更多关注。因此,为了让很大一部分老年人口能够有收益地参与进来,应该通过提供适当的服务来确保他们的护理和支持,这些服务可以增强他们的角色和责任,提高他们的整体幸福感。