University of Iowa College of Public Health.
University of Iowa College of Engineering.
J Agric Saf Health. 2020;26(4):123-137. doi: 10.13031/jash.14043.
Transportation-related incidents are the leading cause of occupational fatalities for all industries in the U.S., including the agricultural industry, which suffers thou- sands of crashes involving farm equipment each year. Simulated driving studies offer a safe and cost-effective way to conduct driving research that would not be feasible in the real world. A tractor driving miniSim was developed and then evaluated for realism at the University of Iowa among 99 Midwestern farm equipment operators. It is important for driving simulators to have a high degree of realism for their results to be applicable to non-simulated driving operations. High-fidelity driving simulators facilitate extrapolations made by driving research but should be re-tested for realism when changes are made to the design of the simulator. The simulator used in this study emulated a tractor cab with realistic controls, three high-resolution screens, and high-fidelity sound. After completing a 10-minute drive, farm equipment operators completed a survey and scored four specific domains assessing specific characteristics (i.e., appearance, user interface, control, and sound) of the tractor simulator's realism using a seven-point Likert scale (from 0 = not at all realistic to 6 = completely realistic). An overall realism score and domain scores were calculated. Farm equipment operators were also asked to provide recommendations for improving the tractor miniSim. Overall, farm equipment operators rated the simulator's realism favorably (i.e., >3 on a scale from 0 to 6) for all individual items and domains. The appearance domain received the highest average realism score (mean = 4.58, SD = 1.03), and the sound domain received the lowest average realism score (mean = 3.86, SD = 1.57). We found no significant differences in realism scores across farm equipment operator characteristics. The most frequently suggested improvements were to tighten the steering wheel (27%), make the front tires visible (19%), and that no improvements were needed to improve the simulator realism (18%). This study demonstrates that the new trac- tor miniSim is a viable approach to studying farm equipment operations and events that can lead to tractor-related crashes. Future studies should incorporate the suggested improvements and seek to validate the simulator as a research and outreach instrument.
在美国,所有行业包括农业,交通运输相关事故都是导致职业死亡的主要原因,每年都有数千起涉及农业设备的事故。模拟驾驶研究提供了一种安全且具有成本效益的方式来进行现实世界中无法进行的驾驶研究。在爱荷华大学,99 名中西部农业设备操作人员对一种拖拉机驾驶迷你模拟设备进行了开发和评估,以评估其现实性。对于驾驶模拟器来说,具有高度的现实性非常重要,因为这样其结果才能适用于非模拟驾驶操作。高保真度驾驶模拟器促进了驾驶研究的推断,但当设计模拟器时发生更改时,应重新测试其现实性。本研究中使用的模拟器模拟了带有逼真控制装置、三个高分辨率屏幕和高保真度声音的拖拉机驾驶室。在完成 10 分钟的驾驶后,农业设备操作人员完成了一项调查,并使用七点 Likert 量表(从 0=一点也不真实到 6=完全真实)对拖拉机模拟器的四个特定领域(即外观、用户界面、控制和声音)的现实性进行了四项特定领域的评分,以评估特定特征。计算了总体现实得分和领域得分。还要求农业设备操作人员提供改进拖拉机迷你模拟的建议。总体而言,农业设备操作人员对模拟器的现实性评价很高(即,在 0 到 6 的范围内大于 3),对所有单独项目和领域都是如此。外观领域的平均现实得分最高(平均值=4.58,SD=1.03),声音领域的平均现实得分最低(平均值=3.86,SD=1.57)。我们发现,在农业设备操作人员特征方面,现实得分没有显著差异。最常建议的改进措施是收紧方向盘(27%)、使前轮胎可见(19%)和无需改进即可提高模拟器的现实性(18%)。这项研究表明,新型拖拉机迷你模拟是研究农业设备操作和可能导致拖拉机相关事故的事件的一种可行方法。未来的研究应纳入这些建议的改进措施,并寻求将模拟器作为一种研究和推广工具进行验证。