Suppr超能文献

文献信息中心在促进研究透明化方面的作用:预防干预措施透明化实践的方法学研究

The Role of Clearinghouses in Promoting Transparent Research: A Methodological Study of Transparency Practices for Preventive Interventions.

机构信息

Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, 80309, USA.

University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.

出版信息

Prev Sci. 2022 Jul;23(5):787-798. doi: 10.1007/s11121-021-01252-5. Epub 2021 May 13.

Abstract

Transparency of research methods is vital to science, though incentives are variable, with only some journals and funders adopting transparency policies. Clearinghouses are also important stakeholders; however, to date none have implemented formal procedures that facilitate transparent research. Using data from the longest standing clearinghouse, we examine transparency practices for preventive interventions to explore the role of online clearinghouses in incentivizing researchers to make their research more transparent. We conducted a descriptive analysis of 88 evaluation reports reviewed in 2018-2019 by Blueprints for Healthy Youth Development, when the clearinghouse began checking for trial registrations, and expanded on these efforts by applying broader transparency standards to interventions eligible for an endorsement on the Blueprints website during the study period. Reports were recent, with 84% published between 2010 and 2019. We found that few reports had data, code, or research materials that were publicly available. Meanwhile, 40% had protocols that were registered, but only 8% were registered prospectively, while one-quarter were registered before conducting analyses. About one-third included details in a registered protocol describing the treatment contrast and planned inclusions, and less than 5% had a registered statistical analysis plan (e.g., planned analytical methods, pre-specified covariates). Confirmatory research was distinguished from exploratory work in roughly 40% of reports. Reports published more recently (after 2015) had higher rates of transparency. Preventive intervention research needs to be more transparent. Since clearinghouses rely on robust findings to make well-informed decisions and researchers are incentivized to meet clearinghouse standards, clearinghouses should consider policies that encourage transparency to improve the credibility of evidence-based interventions.

摘要

研究方法的透明度对科学至关重要,尽管激励措施各不相同,只有一些期刊和资助者采用了透明度政策。信息交换所也是重要的利益相关者;然而,迄今为止,没有一个信息交换所实施了促进透明研究的正式程序。我们利用历史最悠久的信息交换所的数据,研究了预防干预措施的透明度做法,以探讨在线信息交换所在激励研究人员使研究更加透明方面的作用。我们对Blueprint for Healthy Youth Development 在 2018-2019 年审查的 88 份评估报告进行了描述性分析,当时该信息交换所开始检查试验注册情况,并通过将更广泛的透明度标准应用于研究期间Blueprint 网站上有资格获得认可的干预措施,扩大了这些努力。报告是最近的,84%是在 2010 年至 2019 年期间发表的。我们发现,很少有报告的数据、代码或研究材料是公开可用的。与此同时,40%的报告有已注册的方案,但只有 8%是前瞻性注册的,而四分之一的报告是在进行分析之前注册的。大约三分之一的报告在已注册的方案中包含了描述治疗对比和计划纳入的细节,不到 5%的报告有已注册的统计分析计划(例如,计划分析方法、预设协变量)。约 40%的报告将确证性研究与探索性工作区分开来。最近(2015 年后)发表的报告具有更高的透明度。预防干预研究需要更加透明。由于信息交换所依赖于可靠的发现来做出明智的决策,并且研究人员受到满足信息交换所标准的激励,因此信息交换所应该考虑鼓励透明度的政策,以提高循证干预措施的可信度。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验