Gardner Claire, Moseley G Lorimer, Karran Emma L, Wiles Louise K, Hibbert Peter
IIMPACT in Health, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
Can J Pain. 2020 May 18;4(1):86-102. doi: 10.1080/24740527.2020.1732808.
: Many barriers exist to delivering high-value care for people with low back pain (LBP). We have developed a multistrategy implementation system to overcome these barriers. Here we describe a qualitative evaluation of the experiences of private-sector physiotherapists implementing the system. : PRISM (Practice-based innovation and implementation system) is an iterative clinician-as-scientist implementation program, tailored here for acute and subacute LBP. PRISM integrates strategies from behavioral change, implementation, and educational science fields. Semistructured interviews, group discussion forums, and electronic questionnaires were used to collect data at multiple time points that were then analyzed using an interpretative descriptive approach. : Six physiotherapists (purposive sample) practicing in private practice physiotherapy clinics in the Adelaide region, South Australia, were enrolled in the study. : Interventions included an educational pain science and care workshop incorporating self-regulated learning principles, a co-planned clinical pathway, an electronic decision support tool, development and support of a community of practice, case study simulations, audit and feedback, and collaborative problem solving and innovation for physiotherapists. : Participants' experiences and perceptions centered around five themes: (1) knowledge and skills training; (2) networking and mentoring; (3) a clear clinical pathway; (4) practical tools; and (5) data feedback. Participants appraised the implementation process positively but identified patient receptiveness as a challenge at times. Suggestions for improvement included streamlining/automating data collection forms and processes and providing more simulation opportunities. : PRISM appears to be a promising approach to overcoming several barriers that prevent people with back pain from receiving high-value care. It consolidates and increases pain science knowledge and increases physiotherapist confidence in delivering high-value care. It appears to legitimize some current practices, enhance clinical reasoning and communication skills, extend knowledge in line with contemporary pain science, and facilitate the application of a biopsychosocial management approach. The high-level acceptance by participants provides a foundation for further research to test outcomes and delivery in different settings. A quality improvement intervention designed to improve delivery of high-value care was well received by private practice physiotherapists.Physiotherapists particularly valued using experiential learning to improve fluency in communicating with, and educating patients about, contemporary pain science.A structured clinical pathway and tools guided physiotherapists on the basic elements of necessary care and allowed them to concentrate on higher levels of decision making and communication with patients.
为腰痛患者提供高价值护理存在诸多障碍。我们开发了一种多策略实施系统来克服这些障碍。在此,我们描述了对实施该系统的私营部门物理治疗师的经验进行的定性评估。PRISM(基于实践的创新与实施系统)是一个迭代的临床医生即科学家实施项目,在此针对急性和亚急性腰痛进行了定制。PRISM整合了行为改变、实施和教育科学领域的策略。采用半结构化访谈、小组讨论论坛和电子问卷在多个时间点收集数据,然后使用解释性描述方法进行分析。在南澳大利亚阿德莱德地区的私人执业物理治疗诊所执业的六名物理治疗师(目的抽样)参与了该研究。干预措施包括一个纳入自我调节学习原则的疼痛科学与护理教育工作坊、共同规划的临床路径、电子决策支持工具、实践社区的发展与支持、案例研究模拟、审核与反馈,以及为物理治疗师提供协作式问题解决和创新。参与者的经验和看法围绕五个主题:(1)知识和技能培训;(2)建立网络和指导;(3)明确的临床路径;(4)实用工具;(5)数据反馈。参与者对实施过程给予了积极评价,但有时也将患者的接受度视为一项挑战。改进建议包括简化/自动化数据收集表格和流程以及提供更多模拟机会。PRISM似乎是克服一些阻碍腰痛患者获得高价值护理的障碍的一种有前景的方法。它巩固并增加了疼痛科学知识,增强了物理治疗师提供高价值护理的信心。它似乎使一些当前的实践合法化,提高了临床推理和沟通技能,根据当代疼痛科学扩展了知识,并促进了生物心理社会管理方法的应用。参与者的高度认可为进一步研究在不同环境中测试结果和实施提供了基础。一项旨在改善高价值护理提供的质量改进干预措施受到了私人执业物理治疗师的好评。物理治疗师特别重视使用体验式学习来提高与患者就当代疼痛科学进行沟通和教育的流畅性。结构化的临床路径和工具指导物理治疗师了解必要护理的基本要素,并使他们能够专注于更高层次的决策以及与患者的沟通。