• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Social information use and social information waste.社会信息利用和社会信息浪费。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Jul 5;376(1828):20200052. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0052. Epub 2021 May 17.
2
Beyond social learning.超越社会学习。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Jul 5;376(1828):20200050. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0050. Epub 2021 May 17.
3
The cultural evolution of cultural evolution.文化进化的文化进化。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Jul 5;376(1828):20200051. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0051. Epub 2021 May 17.
4
How cultural evolutionary theory can inform social psychology and vice versa.文化进化理论如何为社会心理学提供信息,反之亦然。
Psychol Rev. 2009 Oct;116(4):929-52. doi: 10.1037/a0017062.
5
The evolution of social learning as phenotypic cue integration.社会学习的进化:表型线索整合。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Jul 5;376(1828):20200048. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0048. Epub 2021 May 17.
6
Thinking through other minds: A variational approach to cognition and culture.透过他人的思维思考:认知与文化的变分方法
Behav Brain Sci. 2019 May 30;43:e90. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X19001213.
7
Enquire within: cultural evolution and cognitive science.内部探究:文化进化与认知科学。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018 Apr 5;373(1743). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0051.
8
Cultural transmission in an ever-changing world: trial-and-error copying may be more robust than precise imitation.在不断变化的世界中进行文化传播:试错复制可能比精确模仿更稳健。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018 Apr 5;373(1743). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0050.
9
Not by transmission alone: the role of invention in cultural evolution.并非仅通过传播:发明在文化进化中的作用。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Jul 5;376(1828):20200049. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0049. Epub 2021 May 17.
10
Underappreciated features of cultural evolution.被低估的文化进化特征。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Jul 5;376(1828):20200259. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0259. Epub 2021 May 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Neural correlates of Bayesian social belief updating in the medial prefrontal cortex.内侧前额叶皮质中贝叶斯社会信念更新的神经关联
Cereb Cortex. 2025 Aug 1;35(8). doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhaf251.
2
Developmental differences in social information use under uncertainty: A neurocomputational approach.不确定性下社会信息利用的发展差异:一种神经计算方法。
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2025 Aug 7;75:101604. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2025.101604.
3
Decision-making preferences for intuition, deliberation, friends or crowds in independent and interdependent societies.独立和相互依存社会中对直觉、深思、朋友或群体的决策偏好。
Proc Biol Sci. 2025 Aug;292(2052):20251355. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2025.1355. Epub 2025 Aug 13.
4
Individual differences in speed-accuracy trade-off influence social decision-making in dyads.速度-准确性权衡中的个体差异会影响二元组中的社会决策。
Proc Biol Sci. 2025 Jul;292(2051):20251077. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2025.1077. Epub 2025 Jul 16.
5
When to stop social learning from a predecessor in an information-foraging task.在信息搜寻任务中,何时停止向先行者进行社会学习。
Evol Hum Sci. 2025 Jan 20;7:e2. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2024.29. eCollection 2025.
6
A meta-analysis of the weight of advice in decision-making.决策中建议权重的荟萃分析。
Curr Psychol. 2023 Oct;42(28):24516-24541. doi: 10.1007/s12144-022-03573-2. Epub 2022 Aug 9.
7
Experience and advice consequences shape information sharing strategies.经验和建议结果塑造信息共享策略。
Commun Psychol. 2024 Dec 19;2(1):123. doi: 10.1038/s44271-024-00175-5.
8
Humans flexibly integrate social information despite interindividual differences in reward.人类在奖励存在个体差异的情况下,仍能灵活地整合社会信息。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Sep 24;121(39):e2404928121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2404928121. Epub 2024 Sep 20.
9
Investigating the effects of social information on spite in an online game.研究社交信息对在线游戏中恶意行为的影响。
Evol Hum Sci. 2024 Apr 12;6:e26. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2024.18. eCollection 2024.
10
Earlier social information has a stronger influence on judgments. 先前的社会信息对判断的影响更大。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 2;14(1):105. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-50345-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Majority rules: how good are we at aggregating convergent opinions?多数原则:我们在汇总趋同意见方面表现如何?
Evol Hum Sci. 2019 May 31;1:e6. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2019.6. eCollection 2019.
2
Modelling cultural systems and selective filters.建模文化系统和选择过滤器。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Jul 5;376(1828):20200045. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0045. Epub 2021 May 17.
3
Beyond social learning.超越社会学习。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Jul 5;376(1828):20200050. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0050. Epub 2021 May 17.
4
The role of decision confidence in advice-taking and trust formation.决策信心在采纳建议和建立信任方面的作用。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2021 Mar;150(3):507-526. doi: 10.1037/xge0000960. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
5
The ecological roots of human susceptibility to social influence: a pre-registered study investigating the impact of early-life adversity.人类易受社会影响的生态根源:一项预先注册的研究,调查早年逆境的影响。
R Soc Open Sci. 2019 Jan 9;6(1):180454. doi: 10.1098/rsos.180454. eCollection 2019 Jan.
6
Why Does Advice Discounting Occur? The Combined Roles of Confidence and Trust.为什么会出现建议折扣现象?信心与信任的综合作用。
Front Psychol. 2018 Nov 28;9:2381. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02381. eCollection 2018.
7
Individuals fail to reap the collective benefits of diversity because of over-reliance on personal information.由于过度依赖个人信息,个人无法获得多样性的集体效益。
J R Soc Interface. 2018 May;15(142). doi: 10.1098/rsif.2018.0155.
8
Vigilant conservatism in evaluating communicated information.在评估所传达信息时保持警惕的保守态度。
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 10;13(1):e0188825. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188825. eCollection 2018.
9
Unrealistic optimism in advice taking: A computational account.盲目乐观的咨询接受:一种计算解释。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2018 Feb;147(2):170-189. doi: 10.1037/xge0000382. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
10
How social information can improve estimation accuracy in human groups.社会信息如何提高人类群体中的估计准确性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Nov 21;114(47):12620-12625. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1703695114. Epub 2017 Nov 8.

社会信息利用和社会信息浪费。

Social information use and social information waste.

机构信息

Institut Jean Nicod, DEC, ENS, EHESS, CNRS, PSL University, UMR 8129, Paris, France.

Minds and Traditions Research Group, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Jena, Germany.

出版信息

Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Jul 5;376(1828):20200052. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0052. Epub 2021 May 17.

DOI:10.1098/rstb.2020.0052
PMID:33993762
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8126467/
Abstract

Social information is immensely valuable. Yet we waste it. The information we get from observing other humans and from communicating with them is a cheap and reliable informational resource. It is considered the backbone of human cultural evolution. Theories and models focused on the evolution of social learning show the great adaptive benefits of evolving cognitive tools to process it. In spite of this, human adults in the experimental literature use social information quite inefficiently: they do not take it sufficiently into account. A comprehensive review of the literature on five experimental tasks documented 45 studies showing social information waste, and four studies showing social information being over-used. These studies cover 'egocentric discounting' phenomena as studied by social psychology, but also include experimental social learning studies. Social information waste means that human adults fail to give social information its optimal weight. Both proximal explanations and accounts derived from evolutionary theory leave crucial aspects of the phenomenon unaccounted for: egocentric discounting is a pervasive effect that no single unifying explanation fully captures. Cultural evolutionary theory's insistence on the power and benefits of social influence is to be balanced against this phenomenon. This article is part of the theme issue 'Foundations of cultural evolution'.

摘要

社会信息具有巨大的价值。然而,我们却浪费了它。我们从观察他人和与他们交流中获得的信息是一种廉价且可靠的信息资源。它被认为是人类文化进化的支柱。专注于社会学习进化的理论和模型表明,进化认知工具来处理它具有巨大的适应优势。尽管如此,实验文献中的成年人类使用社会信息的效率相当低:他们没有充分考虑到社会信息。对五项实验任务的文献进行的综合回顾记录了 45 项研究,这些研究表明存在社会信息浪费现象,还有四项研究表明社会信息被过度使用。这些研究涵盖了社会心理学研究的“自我中心折扣”现象,但也包括实验社会学习研究。社会信息浪费意味着成年人类未能给予社会信息应有的重视。近因解释和源自进化理论的解释都没有充分说明这一现象:自我中心折扣是一种普遍存在的效应,没有一个单一的统一解释能够完全捕捉到它。文化进化理论坚持认为社会影响具有强大的力量和益处,需要与这一现象相平衡。本文是“文化进化基础”主题专刊的一部分。