Suppr超能文献

社会信息利用和社会信息浪费。

Social information use and social information waste.

机构信息

Institut Jean Nicod, DEC, ENS, EHESS, CNRS, PSL University, UMR 8129, Paris, France.

Minds and Traditions Research Group, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Jena, Germany.

出版信息

Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Jul 5;376(1828):20200052. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0052. Epub 2021 May 17.

Abstract

Social information is immensely valuable. Yet we waste it. The information we get from observing other humans and from communicating with them is a cheap and reliable informational resource. It is considered the backbone of human cultural evolution. Theories and models focused on the evolution of social learning show the great adaptive benefits of evolving cognitive tools to process it. In spite of this, human adults in the experimental literature use social information quite inefficiently: they do not take it sufficiently into account. A comprehensive review of the literature on five experimental tasks documented 45 studies showing social information waste, and four studies showing social information being over-used. These studies cover 'egocentric discounting' phenomena as studied by social psychology, but also include experimental social learning studies. Social information waste means that human adults fail to give social information its optimal weight. Both proximal explanations and accounts derived from evolutionary theory leave crucial aspects of the phenomenon unaccounted for: egocentric discounting is a pervasive effect that no single unifying explanation fully captures. Cultural evolutionary theory's insistence on the power and benefits of social influence is to be balanced against this phenomenon. This article is part of the theme issue 'Foundations of cultural evolution'.

摘要

社会信息具有巨大的价值。然而,我们却浪费了它。我们从观察他人和与他们交流中获得的信息是一种廉价且可靠的信息资源。它被认为是人类文化进化的支柱。专注于社会学习进化的理论和模型表明,进化认知工具来处理它具有巨大的适应优势。尽管如此,实验文献中的成年人类使用社会信息的效率相当低:他们没有充分考虑到社会信息。对五项实验任务的文献进行的综合回顾记录了 45 项研究,这些研究表明存在社会信息浪费现象,还有四项研究表明社会信息被过度使用。这些研究涵盖了社会心理学研究的“自我中心折扣”现象,但也包括实验社会学习研究。社会信息浪费意味着成年人类未能给予社会信息应有的重视。近因解释和源自进化理论的解释都没有充分说明这一现象:自我中心折扣是一种普遍存在的效应,没有一个单一的统一解释能够完全捕捉到它。文化进化理论坚持认为社会影响具有强大的力量和益处,需要与这一现象相平衡。本文是“文化进化基础”主题专刊的一部分。

相似文献

1
Social information use and social information waste.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Jul 5;376(1828):20200052. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0052. Epub 2021 May 17.
2
Beyond social learning.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Jul 5;376(1828):20200050. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0050. Epub 2021 May 17.
3
The cultural evolution of cultural evolution.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Jul 5;376(1828):20200051. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0051. Epub 2021 May 17.
4
How cultural evolutionary theory can inform social psychology and vice versa.
Psychol Rev. 2009 Oct;116(4):929-52. doi: 10.1037/a0017062.
5
The evolution of social learning as phenotypic cue integration.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Jul 5;376(1828):20200048. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0048. Epub 2021 May 17.
6
Thinking through other minds: A variational approach to cognition and culture.
Behav Brain Sci. 2019 May 30;43:e90. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X19001213.
7
Enquire within: cultural evolution and cognitive science.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018 Apr 5;373(1743). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0051.
8
Cultural transmission in an ever-changing world: trial-and-error copying may be more robust than precise imitation.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018 Apr 5;373(1743). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0050.
9
Not by transmission alone: the role of invention in cultural evolution.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Jul 5;376(1828):20200049. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0049. Epub 2021 May 17.
10
Underappreciated features of cultural evolution.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Jul 5;376(1828):20200259. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0259. Epub 2021 May 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Neural correlates of Bayesian social belief updating in the medial prefrontal cortex.
Cereb Cortex. 2025 Aug 1;35(8). doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhaf251.
2
Developmental differences in social information use under uncertainty: A neurocomputational approach.
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2025 Aug 7;75:101604. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2025.101604.
3
Decision-making preferences for intuition, deliberation, friends or crowds in independent and interdependent societies.
Proc Biol Sci. 2025 Aug;292(2052):20251355. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2025.1355. Epub 2025 Aug 13.
4
Individual differences in speed-accuracy trade-off influence social decision-making in dyads.
Proc Biol Sci. 2025 Jul;292(2051):20251077. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2025.1077. Epub 2025 Jul 16.
5
When to stop social learning from a predecessor in an information-foraging task.
Evol Hum Sci. 2025 Jan 20;7:e2. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2024.29. eCollection 2025.
6
A meta-analysis of the weight of advice in decision-making.
Curr Psychol. 2023 Oct;42(28):24516-24541. doi: 10.1007/s12144-022-03573-2. Epub 2022 Aug 9.
7
Experience and advice consequences shape information sharing strategies.
Commun Psychol. 2024 Dec 19;2(1):123. doi: 10.1038/s44271-024-00175-5.
8
Humans flexibly integrate social information despite interindividual differences in reward.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Sep 24;121(39):e2404928121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2404928121. Epub 2024 Sep 20.
9
Investigating the effects of social information on spite in an online game.
Evol Hum Sci. 2024 Apr 12;6:e26. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2024.18. eCollection 2024.
10
Earlier social information has a stronger influence on judgments.
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 2;14(1):105. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-50345-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Majority rules: how good are we at aggregating convergent opinions?
Evol Hum Sci. 2019 May 31;1:e6. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2019.6. eCollection 2019.
2
Modelling cultural systems and selective filters.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Jul 5;376(1828):20200045. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0045. Epub 2021 May 17.
3
Beyond social learning.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Jul 5;376(1828):20200050. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0050. Epub 2021 May 17.
4
The role of decision confidence in advice-taking and trust formation.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2021 Mar;150(3):507-526. doi: 10.1037/xge0000960. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
6
Why Does Advice Discounting Occur? The Combined Roles of Confidence and Trust.
Front Psychol. 2018 Nov 28;9:2381. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02381. eCollection 2018.
8
Vigilant conservatism in evaluating communicated information.
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 10;13(1):e0188825. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188825. eCollection 2018.
9
Unrealistic optimism in advice taking: A computational account.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2018 Feb;147(2):170-189. doi: 10.1037/xge0000382. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
10
How social information can improve estimation accuracy in human groups.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Nov 21;114(47):12620-12625. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1703695114. Epub 2017 Nov 8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验