State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Center for Evolutionary Biology, Collaborative Innovation Center for Genetics and Development, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, People's Republic of China.
Department of Anthropology, University College London, London WC1H 0BW, UK.
Proc Biol Sci. 2023 Jul 12;290(2002):20230606. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2023.0606. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
The origin of tone, also known as , has long been a topic of great interest in language evolution and human cognition studies. Several linguistic studies of tonal languages have proposed various hypotheses that tonal origin may be related to different changes of phonological structures. However, such hypotheses have not been quantitatively tested in an evolutionary framework. Here, we conducted phylogenetic comparative analyses to assess the likelihood of different hypotheses of tonogenetic mechanisms across 106 Sino-Tibetan languages, of which approximately 70% are tonal. Our results showed that the presence of tones has a strong phylogenetic pattern and that Proto-Sino-Tibetan languages were most likely non-tonal. Our findings identified that tonal origin was strongly associated with the evolution of specific phonological structures, such as the loss of syllable-final consonants and voice quality on vowels. Furthermore, we found that tonal origin probably did not influence the diversification rates of Sino-Tibetan languages. These findings enabled us to better understand that tone arose as a compensatory mechanism for the structural organization and evolution of languages.
声调的起源,也被称为 tone sandhi,长期以来一直是语言进化和人类认知研究的热点话题。一些关于声调语言的语言学研究提出了各种假设,认为声调的起源可能与不同的音系结构变化有关。然而,这些假设在进化框架中尚未得到定量检验。在这里,我们进行了系统发育比较分析,以评估在 106 种汉藏语系语言中不同声调发生机制假设的可能性,其中约 70%是声调语言。我们的结果表明,声调的存在具有很强的系统发育模式,原始汉藏语系语言很可能是非声调语言。我们的研究结果表明,声调的起源与特定音系结构的进化密切相关,例如音节末尾辅音的丢失和元音的浊音音质。此外,我们发现声调的起源可能不会影响汉藏语系语言的多样化速度。这些发现使我们能够更好地理解,声调的出现是作为语言结构组织和进化的一种补偿机制。