Department of Anthropology, UCL , 14 Taviton Street, London WC1H 0BW, UK.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011 Feb 12;366(1563):402-11. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0238.
A growing body of theoretical and empirical research has examined cultural transmission and adaptive cultural behaviour at the individual, within-group level. However, relatively few studies have tried to examine proximate transmission or test ultimate adaptive hypotheses about behavioural or cultural diversity at a between-societies macro-level. In both the history of anthropology and in present-day work, a common approach to examining adaptive behaviour at the macro-level has been through correlating various cultural traits with features of ecology. We discuss some difficulties with simple ecological associations, and then review cultural phylogenetic studies that have attempted to go beyond correlations to understand the underlying cultural evolutionary processes. We conclude with an example of a phylogenetically controlled approach to understanding proximate transmission pathways in Austronesian cultural diversity.
越来越多的理论和实证研究已经在个体和群体层面上研究了文化传播和适应性的文化行为。然而,相对较少的研究试图在社会间宏观层面上检验行为或文化多样性的近似传播或终极适应假说。在人类学的历史和当今的工作中,一种常见的在宏观层面上检查适应性行为的方法是将各种文化特征与生态特征相关联。我们讨论了与简单的生态关联相关的一些困难,然后回顾了试图超越相关性来理解潜在的文化进化过程的文化系统发育研究。最后,我们以一个理解南岛语系文化多样性中近似传播途径的系统发育控制方法为例。