Suppr超能文献

通过创新措施评估预先知识作弊:联合建模项目反应、反应时间和视觉注视次数的多组分析

Assessing Preknowledge Cheating via Innovative Measures: A Multiple-Group Analysis of Jointly Modeling Item Responses, Response Times, and Visual Fixation Counts.

作者信息

Man Kaiwen, Harring Jeffrey R

机构信息

University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA.

University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.

出版信息

Educ Psychol Meas. 2021 Jun;81(3):441-465. doi: 10.1177/0013164420968630. Epub 2020 Oct 31.

Abstract

Many approaches have been proposed to jointly analyze item responses and response times to understand behavioral differences between normally and aberrantly behaved test-takers. Biometric information, such as data from eye trackers, can be used to better identify these deviant testing behaviors in addition to more conventional data types. Given this context, this study demonstrates the application of a new method for multiple-group analysis that concurrently models item responses, response times, and visual fixation counts collected from an eye-tracker. It is hypothesized that differences in behavioral patterns between normally behaved test-takers and those who have different levels of preknowledge about the test items will manifest in latent characteristics of the different data types. A Bayesian estimation scheme is used to fit the proposed model to experimental data and the results are discussed.

摘要

为了理解正常表现和异常表现的考生之间的行为差异,人们提出了许多方法来联合分析项目反应和反应时间。除了更传统的数据类型外,生物特征信息(如来自眼动仪的数据)可用于更好地识别这些异常的测试行为。在此背景下,本研究展示了一种用于多组分析的新方法的应用,该方法同时对从眼动仪收集的项目反应、反应时间和视觉注视次数进行建模。据推测,正常表现的考生与那些对测试项目有不同程度的先验知识的考生之间的行为模式差异将体现在不同数据类型的潜在特征中。采用贝叶斯估计方案将所提出的模型拟合到实验数据中,并对结果进行了讨论。

相似文献

4
Negative Binomial Models for Visual Fixation Counts on Test Items.用于测试项目视觉注视次数的负二项式模型。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2019 Aug;79(4):617-635. doi: 10.1177/0013164418824148. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
8
Two New Models for Item Preknowledge.项目预知识的两种新模型。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2022 Sep;46(6):447-461. doi: 10.1177/01466216221108130. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
10
Detecting Item Preknowledge Using a Predictive Checking Method.使用预测性检查方法检测项目预知识。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2017 Jun;41(4):243-263. doi: 10.1177/0146621616687285. Epub 2017 Jan 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Detecting Differential Item Functioning Using Response Time.利用反应时间检测项目功能差异
Educ Psychol Meas. 2024 Oct 26:00131644241280400. doi: 10.1177/00131644241280400.
8
Bayesian Analysis of Aberrant Response and Response Time Data.异常反应和反应时间数据的贝叶斯分析
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 25;13:841372. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.841372. eCollection 2022.
9
Effects of Compounded Nonnormality of Residuals in Hierarchical Linear Modeling.分层线性模型中残差复合非正态性的影响
Educ Psychol Meas. 2022 Apr;82(2):330-355. doi: 10.1177/00131644211010234. Epub 2021 May 10.
10
Editorial: Process Data in Educational and Psychological Measurement.社论:教育与心理测量中的过程数据
Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 3;12:793399. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.793399. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Negative Binomial Models for Visual Fixation Counts on Test Items.用于测试项目视觉注视次数的负二项式模型。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2019 Aug;79(4):617-635. doi: 10.1177/0013164418824148. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
5
Modelling Conditional Dependence Between Response Time and Accuracy.建模反应时与准确率之间的条件相依性。
Psychometrika. 2017 Dec;82(4):1126-1148. doi: 10.1007/s11336-016-9537-6. Epub 2016 Oct 13.
6

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验