• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Assessing Preknowledge Cheating via Innovative Measures: A Multiple-Group Analysis of Jointly Modeling Item Responses, Response Times, and Visual Fixation Counts.通过创新措施评估预先知识作弊:联合建模项目反应、反应时间和视觉注视次数的多组分析
Educ Psychol Meas. 2021 Jun;81(3):441-465. doi: 10.1177/0013164420968630. Epub 2020 Oct 31.
2
Detecting Preknowledge Cheating via Innovative Measures: A Mixture Hierarchical Model for Jointly Modeling Item Responses, Response Times, and Visual Fixation Counts.通过创新措施检测预先知晓作弊行为:一种用于联合建模项目反应、反应时间和视觉注视次数的混合层次模型
Educ Psychol Meas. 2023 Oct;83(5):1059-1080. doi: 10.1177/00131644221136142. Epub 2022 Nov 16.
3
Bridging Models of Biometric and Psychometric Assessment: A Three-Way Joint Modeling Approach of Item Responses, Response Times, and Gaze Fixation Counts.生物特征与心理测量评估的桥接模型:项目反应、反应时间和注视点计数的三向联合建模方法。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2022 Jul;46(5):361-381. doi: 10.1177/01466216221089344. Epub 2022 May 27.
4
Negative Binomial Models for Visual Fixation Counts on Test Items.用于测试项目视觉注视次数的负二项式模型。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2019 Aug;79(4):617-635. doi: 10.1177/0013164418824148. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
5
Are Exam Questions Known in Advance? Using Local Dependence to Detect Cheating.考试题目会提前泄露吗?利用局部相依性来检测作弊行为。
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 1;11(12):e0167545. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167545. eCollection 2016.
6
Multimodal Data Fusion to Detect Preknowledge Test-Taking Behavior Using Machine Learning.使用机器学习进行多模态数据融合以检测预知识测试行为
Educ Psychol Meas. 2024 Aug;84(4):753-779. doi: 10.1177/00131644231193625. Epub 2023 Sep 19.
7
Joint Modeling of Compensatory Multidimensional Item Responses and Response Times.补偿性多维项目反应与反应时间的联合建模
Appl Psychol Meas. 2019 Nov;43(8):639-654. doi: 10.1177/0146621618824853. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
8
Two New Models for Item Preknowledge.项目预知识的两种新模型。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2022 Sep;46(6):447-461. doi: 10.1177/01466216221108130. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
9
Detecting Examinees With Item Preknowledge in Large-Scale Testing Using Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost).使用极端梯度提升(XGBoost)在大规模测试中检测具有项目先验知识的考生。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2019 Oct;79(5):931-961. doi: 10.1177/0013164419839439. Epub 2019 Apr 2.
10
Detecting Item Preknowledge Using a Predictive Checking Method.使用预测性检查方法检测项目预知识。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2017 Jun;41(4):243-263. doi: 10.1177/0146621616687285. Epub 2017 Jan 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Detecting Differential Item Functioning Using Response Time.利用反应时间检测项目功能差异
Educ Psychol Meas. 2024 Oct 26:00131644241280400. doi: 10.1177/00131644241280400.
2
An Ensemble Learning Approach Based on TabNet and Machine Learning Models for Cheating Detection in Educational Tests.一种基于TabNet和机器学习模型的集成学习方法用于教育考试中的作弊检测。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2024 Aug;84(4):780-809. doi: 10.1177/00131644231191298. Epub 2023 Aug 21.
3
Detecting Preknowledge Cheating via Innovative Measures: A Mixture Hierarchical Model for Jointly Modeling Item Responses, Response Times, and Visual Fixation Counts.通过创新措施检测预先知晓作弊行为:一种用于联合建模项目反应、反应时间和视觉注视次数的混合层次模型
Educ Psychol Meas. 2023 Oct;83(5):1059-1080. doi: 10.1177/00131644221136142. Epub 2022 Nov 16.
4
Detecting Cheating in Large-Scale Assessment: The Transfer of Detectors to New Tests.检测大规模评估中的作弊行为:将检测器应用于新测试
Educ Psychol Meas. 2023 Oct;83(5):1033-1058. doi: 10.1177/00131644221132723. Epub 2022 Nov 4.
5
Exploration of the Stacking Ensemble Machine Learning Algorithm for Cheating Detection in Large-Scale Assessment.用于大规模评估中作弊检测的堆叠集成机器学习算法探索
Educ Psychol Meas. 2023 Aug;83(4):831-854. doi: 10.1177/00131644221117193. Epub 2022 Aug 13.
6
Longitudinal joint modeling for assessing parallel interactive development of latent ability and processing speed using responses and response times.使用反应和反应时间评估潜在能力和加工速度的平行交互发展的纵向联合建模。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Mar;56(3):1656-1677. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02113-5. Epub 2023 Apr 14.
7
Bridging Models of Biometric and Psychometric Assessment: A Three-Way Joint Modeling Approach of Item Responses, Response Times, and Gaze Fixation Counts.生物特征与心理测量评估的桥接模型:项目反应、反应时间和注视点计数的三向联合建模方法。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2022 Jul;46(5):361-381. doi: 10.1177/01466216221089344. Epub 2022 May 27.
8
Bayesian Analysis of Aberrant Response and Response Time Data.异常反应和反应时间数据的贝叶斯分析
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 25;13:841372. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.841372. eCollection 2022.
9
Effects of Compounded Nonnormality of Residuals in Hierarchical Linear Modeling.分层线性模型中残差复合非正态性的影响
Educ Psychol Meas. 2022 Apr;82(2):330-355. doi: 10.1177/00131644211010234. Epub 2021 May 10.
10
Editorial: Process Data in Educational and Psychological Measurement.社论:教育与心理测量中的过程数据
Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 3;12:793399. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.793399. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Negative Binomial Models for Visual Fixation Counts on Test Items.用于测试项目视觉注视次数的负二项式模型。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2019 Aug;79(4):617-635. doi: 10.1177/0013164418824148. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
2
Joint Modeling of Compensatory Multidimensional Item Responses and Response Times.补偿性多维项目反应与反应时间的联合建模
Appl Psychol Meas. 2019 Nov;43(8):639-654. doi: 10.1177/0146621618824853. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
3
A mixture model for responses and response times with a higher-order ability structure to detect rapid guessing behaviour.一种用于反应和反应时间的混合模型,具有高阶能力结构以检测快速猜测行为。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2020 May;73(2):261-288. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12175. Epub 2019 Aug 6.
4
An Overview of Models for Response Times and Processes in Cognitive Tests.认知测试中反应时间与过程的模型概述
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 6;10:102. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00102. eCollection 2019.
5
Modelling Conditional Dependence Between Response Time and Accuracy.建模反应时与准确率之间的条件相依性。
Psychometrika. 2017 Dec;82(4):1126-1148. doi: 10.1007/s11336-016-9537-6. Epub 2016 Oct 13.
6
Joint Modeling of Ability and Differential Speed Using Responses and Response Times.使用反应和反应时间对能力与差异速度进行联合建模。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2016 Jul-Aug;51(4):540-53. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2016.1171128. Epub 2016 Jun 7.
7
A generalized linear factor model approach to the hierarchical framework for responses and response times.一种用于响应和响应时间分层框架的广义线性因子模型方法。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2015 May;68(2):197-219. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12042. Epub 2014 Aug 11.
8
Pupillography as an objective indicator of fatigue.瞳孔测量术作为疲劳的客观指标。
Curr Eye Res. 2000 Jul;21(1):535-42.
9
Autonomic balance revisited: panic anxiety and heart rate variability.重新审视自主神经平衡:惊恐焦虑与心率变异性
J Psychosom Res. 1998 Jan;44(1):133-51. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3999(97)00202-x.
10
Pupil size and spontaneous pupillary waves associated with alertness, drowsiness, and sleep.瞳孔大小以及与警觉、嗜睡和睡眠相关的自发性瞳孔波动。
Neurology. 1970 Jun;20(6):545-54. doi: 10.1212/wnl.20.6.545.

通过创新措施评估预先知识作弊:联合建模项目反应、反应时间和视觉注视次数的多组分析

Assessing Preknowledge Cheating via Innovative Measures: A Multiple-Group Analysis of Jointly Modeling Item Responses, Response Times, and Visual Fixation Counts.

作者信息

Man Kaiwen, Harring Jeffrey R

机构信息

University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA.

University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.

出版信息

Educ Psychol Meas. 2021 Jun;81(3):441-465. doi: 10.1177/0013164420968630. Epub 2020 Oct 31.

DOI:10.1177/0013164420968630
PMID:33994559
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8072953/
Abstract

Many approaches have been proposed to jointly analyze item responses and response times to understand behavioral differences between normally and aberrantly behaved test-takers. Biometric information, such as data from eye trackers, can be used to better identify these deviant testing behaviors in addition to more conventional data types. Given this context, this study demonstrates the application of a new method for multiple-group analysis that concurrently models item responses, response times, and visual fixation counts collected from an eye-tracker. It is hypothesized that differences in behavioral patterns between normally behaved test-takers and those who have different levels of preknowledge about the test items will manifest in latent characteristics of the different data types. A Bayesian estimation scheme is used to fit the proposed model to experimental data and the results are discussed.

摘要

为了理解正常表现和异常表现的考生之间的行为差异,人们提出了许多方法来联合分析项目反应和反应时间。除了更传统的数据类型外,生物特征信息(如来自眼动仪的数据)可用于更好地识别这些异常的测试行为。在此背景下,本研究展示了一种用于多组分析的新方法的应用,该方法同时对从眼动仪收集的项目反应、反应时间和视觉注视次数进行建模。据推测,正常表现的考生与那些对测试项目有不同程度的先验知识的考生之间的行为模式差异将体现在不同数据类型的潜在特征中。采用贝叶斯估计方案将所提出的模型拟合到实验数据中,并对结果进行了讨论。