• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种基于TabNet和机器学习模型的集成学习方法用于教育考试中的作弊检测。

An Ensemble Learning Approach Based on TabNet and Machine Learning Models for Cheating Detection in Educational Tests.

作者信息

Zhen Yang, Zhu Xiaoyan

机构信息

Anhui Technical College of Industry and Economy, Hefei, China.

出版信息

Educ Psychol Meas. 2024 Aug;84(4):780-809. doi: 10.1177/00131644231191298. Epub 2023 Aug 21.

DOI:10.1177/00131644231191298
PMID:39055097
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11268385/
Abstract

The pervasive issue of cheating in educational tests has emerged as a paramount concern within the realm of education, prompting scholars to explore diverse methodologies for identifying potential transgressors. While machine learning models have been extensively investigated for this purpose, the untapped potential of TabNet, an intricate deep neural network model, remains uncharted territory. Within this study, a comprehensive evaluation and comparison of 12 base models (naive Bayes, linear discriminant analysis, Gaussian process, support vector machine, decision tree, random forest, Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), AdaBoost, logistic regression, -nearest neighbors, multilayer perceptron, and TabNet) was undertaken to scrutinize their predictive capabilities. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was employed as the performance metric for evaluation. Impressively, the findings underscored the supremacy of TabNet (AUC = 0.85) over its counterparts, signifying the profound aptitude of deep neural network models in tackling tabular tasks, such as the detection of academic dishonesty. Encouraged by these outcomes, we proceeded to synergistically amalgamate the two most efficacious models, TabNet (AUC = 0.85) and AdaBoost (AUC = 0.81), resulting in the creation of an ensemble model christened TabNet-AdaBoost (AUC = 0.92). The emergence of this novel hybrid approach exhibited considerable potential in research endeavors within this domain. Importantly, our investigation has unveiled fresh insights into the utilization of deep neural network models for the purpose of identifying cheating in educational tests.

摘要

教育考试中普遍存在的作弊问题已成为教育领域的首要关注点,促使学者们探索各种方法来识别潜在的违规者。虽然机器学习模型已为此目的进行了广泛研究,但复杂的深度神经网络模型TabNet的未开发潜力仍未被探索。在本研究中,对12个基础模型(朴素贝叶斯、线性判别分析、高斯过程、支持向量机、决策树、随机森林、极端梯度提升(XGBoost)、AdaBoost、逻辑回归、K近邻、多层感知器和TabNet)进行了全面评估和比较,以审查它们的预测能力。采用接收器操作特征曲线(AUC)下的面积作为评估的性能指标。令人印象深刻的是,研究结果强调了TabNet(AUC = 0.85)相对于其他模型的优势,这表明深度神经网络模型在处理表格任务(如检测学术不端行为)方面具有深厚的能力。受这些结果的鼓舞,我们继续将两个最有效的模型TabNet(AUC = 0.85)和AdaBoost(AUC = 0.81)进行协同融合,创建了一个名为TabNet - AdaBoost的集成模型(AUC = 0.92)。这种新颖的混合方法在该领域的研究工作中展现出了巨大的潜力。重要的是,我们的研究揭示了关于利用深度神经网络模型识别教育考试作弊行为的新见解。

相似文献

1
An Ensemble Learning Approach Based on TabNet and Machine Learning Models for Cheating Detection in Educational Tests.一种基于TabNet和机器学习模型的集成学习方法用于教育考试中的作弊检测。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2024 Aug;84(4):780-809. doi: 10.1177/00131644231191298. Epub 2023 Aug 21.
2
Supervised Machine Learning Models for Predicting Sepsis-Associated Liver Injury in Patients With Sepsis: Development and Validation Study Based on a Multicenter Cohort Study.用于预测脓毒症患者脓毒症相关肝损伤的监督式机器学习模型:基于多中心队列研究的开发与验证研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 26;27:e66733. doi: 10.2196/66733.
3
Machine learning analysis of survival outcomes in breast cancer patients treated with chemotherapy, hormone therapy, surgery, and radiotherapy.对接受化疗、激素治疗、手术和放疗的乳腺癌患者生存结果的机器学习分析。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 10;15(1):24981. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-97763-0.
4
Effectiveness of machine learning models in diagnosis of heart disease: a comparative study.机器学习模型在心脏病诊断中的有效性:一项比较研究。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 8;15(1):24568. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-09423-y.
5
Optimized feature selection and advanced machine learning for stroke risk prediction in revascularized coronary artery disease patients.优化特征选择与先进机器学习用于预测冠状动脉疾病血运重建患者的卒中风险
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Jul 24;25(1):276. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-03116-2.
6
Differential Predictability of Preterm Birth Types: Strong Signals for Indicated Cases versus Limited Success in Spontaneous Preterm Birth.早产类型的差异可预测性:指征性病例的强信号与自发性早产的有限成功率
medRxiv. 2025 Jul 10:2025.07.09.25329712. doi: 10.1101/2025.07.09.25329712.
7
Clinical Application of a Big Data Machine Learning Analysis Model for Osteoporotic Fracture Risk Assessment Built on Multicenter Clinical Data in Qingdao City.基于青岛市多中心临床数据构建的骨质疏松性骨折风险评估大数据机器学习分析模型的临床应用
Discov Med. 2025 Jan;37(192):55-63. doi: 10.24976/Discov.Med.202537192.5.
8
Establishment of predictive models for postoperative delirium in elderly patients after knee/hip surgery based on total bilirubin concentration: machine learning algorithms.基于总胆红素浓度建立膝/髋关节置换术后老年患者术后谵妄的预测模型:机器学习算法
BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 Jul 30;25(1):375. doi: 10.1186/s12871-025-03259-9.
9
Proposal for Using AI to Assess Clinical Data Integrity and Generate Metadata: Algorithm Development and Validation.关于使用人工智能评估临床数据完整性并生成元数据的提案:算法开发与验证
JMIR Med Inform. 2025 Jun 30;13:e60204. doi: 10.2196/60204.
10
Development and validation of a machine learning model based on laboratory parameters for preoperative prediction of Ki-67 expression in gliomas.基于实验室参数的机器学习模型用于术前预测胶质瘤中Ki-67表达的开发与验证
J Neurosurg. 2025 Mar 28:1-13. doi: 10.3171/2024.11.JNS241673.

引用本文的文献

1
Using Deep Reinforcement Learning to Decide Test Length.使用深度强化学习来确定测试长度。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2025 May 3:00131644251332972. doi: 10.1177/00131644251332972.
2
A Novel Improvement of Feature Selection for Dynamic Hand Gesture Identification Based on Double Machine Learning.基于双机器学习的动态手势识别特征选择新改进
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Feb 13;25(4):1126. doi: 10.3390/s25041126.

本文引用的文献

1
Exploration of the Stacking Ensemble Machine Learning Algorithm for Cheating Detection in Large-Scale Assessment.用于大规模评估中作弊检测的堆叠集成机器学习算法探索
Educ Psychol Meas. 2023 Aug;83(4):831-854. doi: 10.1177/00131644221117193. Epub 2022 Aug 13.
2
Stock index trend prediction based on TabNet feature selection and long short-term memory.基于 TabNet 特征选择和长短时记忆的股票指数趋势预测。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 13;17(12):e0269195. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269195. eCollection 2022.
3
Explainable diabetes classification using hybrid Bayesian-optimized TabNet architecture.使用混合贝叶斯优化的TabNet架构进行可解释的糖尿病分类
Comput Biol Med. 2022 Dec;151(Pt A):106178. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.106178. Epub 2022 Oct 6.
4
Machine learning based approach to exam cheating detection.基于机器学习的考试作弊检测方法。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 4;16(8):e0254340. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254340. eCollection 2021.
5
Assessing Preknowledge Cheating via Innovative Measures: A Multiple-Group Analysis of Jointly Modeling Item Responses, Response Times, and Visual Fixation Counts.通过创新措施评估预先知识作弊:联合建模项目反应、反应时间和视觉注视次数的多组分析
Educ Psychol Meas. 2021 Jun;81(3):441-465. doi: 10.1177/0013164420968630. Epub 2020 Oct 31.
6
Detecting Examinees With Item Preknowledge in Large-Scale Testing Using Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost).使用极端梯度提升(XGBoost)在大规模测试中检测具有项目先验知识的考生。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2019 Oct;79(5):931-961. doi: 10.1177/0013164419839439. Epub 2019 Apr 2.
7
Detecting Test Tampering Using Item Response Theory.使用项目反应理论检测考试作弊行为。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2015 Dec;75(6):931-953. doi: 10.1177/0013164414568716. Epub 2015 Jan 23.
8
Decision tree methods: applications for classification and prediction.决策树方法:分类与预测应用
Shanghai Arch Psychiatry. 2015 Apr 25;27(2):130-5. doi: 10.11919/j.issn.1002-0829.215044.
9
Using Deterministic, Gated Item Response Theory Model to detect test cheating due to item compromise.使用确定性门控项目反应理论模型来检测因试题泄露导致的考试作弊行为。
Psychometrika. 2013 Jul;78(3):481-97. doi: 10.1007/s11336-012-9311-3. Epub 2013 Jan 3.
10
Review: a gentle introduction to imputation of missing values.综述:缺失值插补的简要介绍
J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Oct;59(10):1087-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.01.014. Epub 2006 Jul 11.