Leweke F Markus, Rohleder Cathrin, Gerth Christoph W, Hellmich Martin, Pukrop Ralf, Koethe Dagmar
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Central Institute of Mental Health, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Youth Mental Health Team, Brain and Mind Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Apr 29;12:614811. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.614811. eCollection 2021.
Cannabidiol (CBD), a principal phytocannabinoid constituent, has demonstrated antipsychotic properties in recent clinical trials. While it has also been suggested a promising candidate for the treatment of neurodegenerative disorders, it failed to demonstrate efficacy in cognitive impairments associated with schizophrenia as an add-on treatment (600 mg/day for 6 weeks) in 18 chronically ill patients co-treated with a variety of psychopharmacologic drugs. Here, we report on the results of parallel-group, active-controlled, mono-therapeutic, double-blind, randomized clinical trial (CBD-CT1; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00628290) in 42 acute paranoid schizophrenic patients receiving either CBD (up to 800 mg/day) or amisulpride (AMI, up to 800 mg/day) for four weeks in an inpatient setting with neurocognition as a secondary objective. Twentynine patients (15 and 14 in the CBD and AMI group, respectively) completed two cognitive assessments at baseline and the end of the treatment period. We investigated the following cognitive domains: pattern recognition, attention, working memory, verbal and visual memory and learning, processing speed, and verbal executive functions. When applying the Bonferroni correction for multiple testing, < 0.0004 would indicate statistical significance. There was no relevant difference in neurocognitive performance between the CBD and the AMI group at baseline, and we observed no post-treatment differences between both groups. However, we observed improvements within both groups from pre-to post-treatment (standardized differences reported as Cohen's ) in visual memory (CBD: 0.49, = 0.015 vs. AMI: 0.63, = 0.018) and processing speed (CBD: 0.41, = 0.004 vs. AMI: 0.57, = 0.023). Furthermore, CBD improved sustained attention (CBD: 0.47, = 0.013, vs. AMI: 0.52, = 0.085), and visuomotor coordination (CBD: 0.32, = 0.010 vs. AMI: 0.63, = 0.088) while AMI led to enhanced working memory performance in two different paradigms (Subject Ordered Pointing Task-AMI: 0.53, = 0.043 vs. CBD: 0.03, = 0.932 and Letter Number Sequencing-AMI: 0.67, = 0.017 vs. CBD: 0.08 = 0.755). There was no relevant correlation between changes in neurocognitive parameters and psychotic symptoms or anandamide serum levels. This study shows that both CBD and AMI improve neurocognitive functioning with comparable efficacy in young and acutely ill schizophrenia patients via an anandamide-independent mechanism.
大麻二酚(CBD)是一种主要的植物大麻素成分,在最近的临床试验中已显示出抗精神病特性。虽然它也被认为是治疗神经退行性疾病的一个有前景的候选药物,但在18名同时接受多种精神药物治疗的慢性病患者中,作为附加治疗(每天600毫克,持续6周),它未能证明对与精神分裂症相关的认知障碍有效。在此,我们报告了一项平行组、活性对照、单药治疗、双盲、随机临床试验(CBD-CT1;ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT00628290)的结果,该试验在42名急性偏执型精神分裂症患者中进行,这些患者在住院环境中接受CBD(每日最高800毫克)或氨磺必利(AMI,每日最高800毫克)治疗四周,以神经认知作为次要目标。29名患者(CBD组和AMI组分别为15名和14名)在基线和治疗期结束时完成了两项认知评估。我们研究了以下认知领域:模式识别、注意力、工作记忆、言语和视觉记忆与学习、处理速度以及言语执行功能。在对多重检验应用Bonferroni校正时,<0.0004表示具有统计学意义。在基线时,CBD组和AMI组的神经认知表现没有相关差异,并且我们观察到两组在治疗后没有差异。然而,我们观察到两组从治疗前到治疗后(标准化差异以Cohen's d表示)在视觉记忆(CBD:0.49,p = 0.015 vs. AMI:0.63,p = 0.018)和处理速度(CBD:0.41,p = 0.004 vs. AMI:0.57,p = 0.023)方面都有改善。此外,CBD改善了持续注意力(CBD:0.47,p = 0.013,vs. AMI:0.52,p = 0.085)和视觉运动协调(CBD:0.32,p = 0.010 vs. AMI:0.63,p = 0.088),而AMI在两种不同范式中导致工作记忆表现增强(主题有序指向任务 - AMI:0.53,p = 0.043 vs. CBD:0.03,p = 0.932和字母数字排序 - AMI:0.67,p = 0.017 vs. CBD:0.08,p = 0.755)。神经认知参数的变化与精神病症状或花生四烯乙醇胺血清水平之间没有相关相关性。这项研究表明,在年轻的急性病精神分裂症患者中,CBD和AMI通过一种不依赖花生四烯乙醇胺的机制以相当的疗效改善神经认知功能。