Baudinet Julian, Simic Mima
Maudsley Centre for Child and Adolescent Eating Disorders (MCCAED), Maudsley Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Department of Psychological Medicine, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience (IoPPN), London, United Kingdom.
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Apr 29;12:652604. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.652604. eCollection 2021.
Adolescent eating disorder day programmes (DP), or partial hospitalization programs, are becoming increasingly widespread worldwide. They typically function as an alternative to inpatient care and/or a step up or down in treatment intensity. There has been an increase in the number of publications within the last 5 years investigating DP outcomes. While there are now numerous programmes operating internationally, there is large variability in the content, structure and theoretical underpinnings of each programme. This makes it difficult to compare programme outcomes, and the impact the therapeutic model may have. To review existing literature on adolescent eating disorder DP treatment models and outcomes. A systematic scoping review was conducted. Four databases (PsychInfo, EMBASE, Medline, CENTRAL) were searched for relevant peer-reviewed journal articles and book chapters investigating adolescent eating disorder DPs that function as alternatives to inpatient treatment. No restrictions on study methodology were imposed. Studies were first mapped by location, study characteristics and day programme treatment characteristics, then narratively synthesized. Forty nine studies were included in this review. All used a quantitative methodology. One study also included qualitative methods. The majority of studies included describe DPs in the USA (69%). Seventy-six percent of the studies described DPs that operate 5-days per week and most (57%) either only admit or only report on outcomes for restrictive eating disorders. Two-thirds (69%) reported on DPs that had a family focused treatment model, the remainder had a more integrated treatment model informed mostly by individual psychotherapeutic models. Generally, DP treatment is associated with weight gain and improvements in eating disorder and comorbid psychopathology. The studies that include follow-up data (27%) reveal improvements are usually maintained from 3 months to 2 years post-treatment. Early weight gain, early psychological change and early therapeutic alliance are associated with improved end of treatment outcomes. Findings regarding other potential predictors of outcome are mixed. Current evidence suggests day programmes are an effective alternative to inpatient treatment that lead to sustained improvements. DPs tend to either be young-person-only with a family-focused treatment model or all age with a more integrative model. Controlled, empirical investigations into the impact of the therapeutic model on outcomes are needed, as are investigations into treatment mechanisms and the individual and parent experience of day programme treatment.
青少年饮食失调日间项目(DP),即部分住院项目,在全球范围内正日益普及。它们通常作为住院治疗的替代方案,和/或作为治疗强度的上调或下调措施。在过去5年里,研究DP结果的出版物数量有所增加。虽然现在国际上有许多项目在运作,但每个项目的内容、结构和理论基础差异很大。这使得比较项目结果以及治疗模式可能产生的影响变得困难。为了回顾关于青少年饮食失调DP治疗模式和结果的现有文献,进行了一项系统的范围综述。在四个数据库(PsychInfo、EMBASE、Medline、CENTRAL)中搜索了相关的同行评审期刊文章和书籍章节,这些文献研究了作为住院治疗替代方案的青少年饮食失调DP。对研究方法没有限制。研究首先按地点、研究特征和日间项目治疗特征进行梳理,然后进行叙述性综合。本综述纳入了49项研究。所有研究都采用了定量方法。一项研究还包括定性方法。大多数研究描述的是美国的DP(69%)。76%的研究描述的是每周运营5天的DP,大多数(57%)要么只接纳限制性饮食失调患者,要么只报告其结果。三分之二(69%)的研究报告了采用以家庭为中心治疗模式的DP,其余的则采用了更多以个体心理治疗模式为基础的综合治疗模式。一般来说,DP治疗与体重增加以及饮食失调和共病心理病理学的改善有关。包含随访数据的研究(27%)显示,治疗后的改善通常在3个月至2年的时间内得以维持。早期体重增加、早期心理变化和早期治疗联盟与治疗结束时的更好结果相关。关于其他潜在结果预测因素的研究结果不一。目前的证据表明,日间项目是住院治疗的有效替代方案,能带来持续改善。DP往往要么是仅针对年轻人且采用以家庭为中心的治疗模式,要么是针对所有年龄段且采用更综合的模式。需要对治疗模式对结果的影响进行对照的实证研究,也需要对治疗机制以及日间项目治疗的个人和家长体验进行研究。