Suppr超能文献

两种计算父权概率方法的阐述性综述。

An expository review of two methods of calculating the paternity probability.

作者信息

Li C C, Chakravarti A

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, PA 15261.

出版信息

Am J Hum Genet. 1988 Aug;43(2):197-205.

Abstract

There are two methods for calculating the posttests probability of paternity, viz., the nonexclusion probability method (E method) and the paternity index method (lambda method). This report reviews these two methods and explains the reasons behind them, in the hope that it might alleviate the current controversy between the advocates of these two methods. The emphasis throughout the paper is on exposition, using simple examples to illustrate certain principles or properties. A discussion follows the presentation of the two methods. The calculation of the paternity index is based on the genotype (or phenotype) of the accused man; and the value of the paternity index remains the same whether the accusation itself is true or false.

摘要

计算父权后验概率有两种方法,即非排除概率法(E法)和父权指数法(λ法)。本报告回顾了这两种方法并解释了其背后的原因,希望这可能缓解目前这两种方法支持者之间的争议。本文通篇重点在于阐述,使用简单示例来说明某些原理或特性。在介绍这两种方法之后进行了讨论。父权指数的计算基于被指控男子的基因型(或表型);无论指控本身是真是假,父权指数的值都保持不变。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验