• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

遗传关系的贝叶斯区间估计:在亲子鉴定中的应用。

Bayesian interval estimation of genetic relationships: application to paternity testing.

作者信息

Goldgar D E, Thompson E A

机构信息

Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Mississippi School of Medicine, Jackson.

出版信息

Am J Hum Genet. 1988 Jan;42(1):135-42.

PMID:3422126
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1715311/
Abstract

Using genetic marker data, we have developed a general methodology for estimating genetic relationships between a set of individuals. The purpose of this paper is to illustrate the practical utility of these methods as applied to the problem of paternity testing. Bayesian methods are used to compute the posterior probability distribution of the genetic relationship parameters. Use of an interval-estimation approach rather than a hypothesis-testing one avoids the problem of the specification of an appropriate null hypothesis in calculating the probability of paternity. Monte Carlo methods are used to evaluate the utility of two sets of genetic markers in obtaining suitably precise estimates of genetic relationship as well as the effect of the prior distribution chosen. Results indicate that with currently available markers a "true" father may be reliably distinguished from any other genetic relationship to the child and that with a reasonable number of markers one can often discriminate between an unrelated individual and one with a second-degree relationship to the child.

摘要

利用遗传标记数据,我们开发了一种用于估计一组个体之间遗传关系的通用方法。本文的目的是说明这些方法在亲子鉴定问题中的实际应用。贝叶斯方法用于计算遗传关系参数的后验概率分布。使用区间估计方法而非假设检验方法避免了在计算父权概率时指定适当零假设的问题。蒙特卡罗方法用于评估两组遗传标记在获得适当精确的遗传关系估计方面的效用以及所选先验分布的影响。结果表明,使用目前可用的标记,可以可靠地将“真正的”父亲与孩子的任何其他遗传关系区分开来,并且使用合理数量的标记通常可以区分与孩子无亲缘关系的个体和与孩子有二级亲缘关系的个体。

相似文献

1
Bayesian interval estimation of genetic relationships: application to paternity testing.遗传关系的贝叶斯区间估计:在亲子鉴定中的应用。
Am J Hum Genet. 1988 Jan;42(1):135-42.
2
Genetic evaluation in the presence of uncertain additive relationships. I. Use of phenotypic information to ascertain paternity.存在不确定加性关系时的遗传评估。I. 利用表型信息确定父系关系。
J Anim Sci. 2007 Oct;85(10):2391-400. doi: 10.2527/jas.2006-667. Epub 2007 May 15.
3
[Formalisation parental genotype recognition for the computation of probability of paternity (author's transl)].用于计算父权概率的亲代基因型识别形式化(作者译)
Ann Genet. 1981;24(2):93-9.
4
Paternity exclusion power: comparative behaviour of autosomal and X-chromosomal markers in standard and deficient cases with inbreeding.父权排除力:常染色体和 X 染色体标记在近亲繁殖标准和不足案例中的比较行为。
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2013 Feb;7(2):290-5. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2012.12.002. Epub 2013 Jan 9.
5
Estimating mutation rates from paternity casework.从亲子鉴定案例中估算突变率。
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2008 Jan;2(1):9-18. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2007.07.002. Epub 2007 Oct 24.
6
Setting the boundaries of prior influence on kinship relation testing: the case of many hypotheses.设定亲缘关系测试中先前影响的边界:多种假说的情况。
Int J Legal Med. 2013 Nov;127(6):1055-63. doi: 10.1007/s00414-013-0827-6. Epub 2013 Feb 3.
7
Exclusions and attributions of paternity: practical experiences of forensic genetics and statistics.父系排除与认定:法医遗传学与统计学的实践经验
Am J Hum Genet. 1980 May;32(3):420-31.
8
A non-excluded set method for the calculation of paternity probability.一种计算父权概率的非排除集方法。
Proc Natl Sci Counc Repub China B. 1994 Jan;18(1):36-43.
9
The probability distribution of the number of loci indicating exclusion in a core set of STR markers.在一组核心STR标记中显示排除的基因座数量的概率分布。
Int J Legal Med. 2000;114(1-2):61-5. doi: 10.1007/s004140000143.
10
Genetic marker analysis in cases of disputed paternity when the alleged father is deceased.当被指控的父亲已去世时,对有争议的亲子关系案件进行基因标记分析。
Ann Clin Lab Sci. 1989 Sep-Oct;19(5):332-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Social network analysis of the genealogy of strawberry: retracing the wild roots of heirloom and modern cultivars.草莓谱系的社会网络分析:追溯传家宝和现代品种的野生根源。
G3 (Bethesda). 2021 Mar 16;11(3). doi: 10.1093/g3journal/jkab015.
2
The power of single-nucleotide polymorphisms for large-scale parentage inference.单核苷酸多态性在大规模亲权鉴定中的作用。
Genetics. 2006 Apr;172(4):2567-82. doi: 10.1534/genetics.105.048074. Epub 2005 Dec 30.
3
Assessing probability of paternity and the product rule in DNA systems.评估DNA系统中的父权概率和乘积法则。
Genetica. 1995;96(1-2):89-98. doi: 10.1007/BF01441154.

本文引用的文献

1
Evidence, probability, and paternity.证据、概率与亲子关系。
Am J Hum Genet. 1985 Jul;37(4):826-7.
2
Guidelines for reporting estimates of probability of paternity.亲权概率估计报告指南。
Am J Hum Genet. 1985 Jul;37(4):819-27.
3
Basic fallacies in the formulation of the paternity index.亲权指数计算公式中的基本谬误。
Am J Hum Genet. 1985 Jul;37(4):809-18.
4
Utility of genetic markers in the study of human resemblance.遗传标记在人类相似性研究中的效用。
Acta Genet Med Gemellol (Roma). 1980;29(4):255-62. doi: 10.1017/s0001566000007765.
5
Some fallacies in the computation of paternity probabilities.亲子关系概率计算中的一些谬误。
Am J Hum Genet. 1984 Jul;36(4):904-15.
6
Estimation of the inbreeding coefficient from phenotype frequencies by a method of maximum likelihood scoring.通过最大似然评分法从表型频率估计近亲繁殖系数。
Biometrics. 1968 Dec;24(4):915-35.
7
Gene identities and multiple relationships.基因身份与多重关系。
Biometrics. 1974 Dec;30(4):667-80.
8
The probability of exclusion of ancestries based on genetic observations.基于基因观察结果排除祖先血统的概率。
Am J Hum Genet. 1985 May;37(3):581-90.
9
Human chromosome variation: the discriminatory power of Q-band heteromorphism (variant) analysis in distinguishing between individuals, with specific application to cases of questionable paternity.人类染色体变异:Q带异态性(变异)分析在个体识别中的鉴别力,特别应用于亲权存疑的案例。
Am J Hum Genet. 1986 Feb;38(2):235-52.
10
Empirical validation of the Essen-Möller probability of paternity.埃森-默勒亲权概率的实证验证。
Am J Hum Genet. 1986 Jul;39(1):123-32.