• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

哪些因素促进住院肿瘤护理环境中医生和护士之间的共同理解?:定性探讨。

Which Factors Promote Shared Understanding Between Physicians and Nurses in Inpatient Oncology Care Settings?: A Qualitative Exploration.

机构信息

Author Affiliation: University of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor.

出版信息

Cancer Nurs. 2022;45(2):E338-E344. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000959.

DOI:10.1097/NCC.0000000000000959
PMID:34010215
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8602402/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Effective communication between physicians and nurses is crucial to the safety of patients, especially for those with cancer, which is a complex disease requiring multidisciplinary treatment. However, little is known about the factors that contribute to effective communication, which is defined as the development of shared understanding between two or more people.

OBJECTIVE

This qualitative secondary analysis was conducted to identify factors that contribute to shared understanding between physicians and nurses from video-recorded conversations that occurred between them during inpatient rounds on oncology units.

METHODS

We used inductive grounded theory to identify videos depicting moments of shared understanding. We then searched for preceding events to develop a preliminary conceptual model that described the factors contributing to shared understanding.

RESULTS

Four factors emerged as contributors to shared understanding: engagement, clarification, confirmation, and resolution. These factors occurred in sequence with engagement occurring first and resolution occurring last, as the closure of a communication exchange.

CONCLUSIONS

Existing interventions to improve communication include some of the factors identified as contributing to shared understanding (eg, closed-loop communications require clarification and confirmation). However, nurses may need to pay attention to all four factors to develop shared understanding that will promote effective communication with physicians and thereby enhance cancer care.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Nurses achieve effective communication when they are assertive and avoid indirect communication. A greater awareness of body language and positioning in relation to a physician at the start of a communication exchange may increase the effectiveness of nurse-physician communication.

摘要

背景

医生和护士之间的有效沟通对于患者的安全至关重要,尤其是对于那些患有癌症的患者,因为癌症是一种需要多学科治疗的复杂疾病。然而,对于促成有效沟通的因素知之甚少,有效沟通被定义为两个人或更多人之间达成共识。

目的

本定性二次分析旨在从肿瘤病房住院查房期间记录的医生和护士的视频对话中确定促成医生和护士之间达成共识的因素。

方法

我们使用归纳扎根理论来识别描述达成共识时刻的视频。然后,我们寻找前置事件来开发一个初步的概念模型,描述促成共识的因素。

结果

有四个因素被确定为促成共识的因素:参与、澄清、确认和解决。这些因素依次发生,参与首先发生,解决最后发生,作为沟通交流的结束。

结论

现有的改善沟通的干预措施包括一些被认为有助于达成共识的因素(例如,闭环沟通需要澄清和确认)。然而,护士可能需要关注所有四个因素,以达成共识,促进与医生的有效沟通,从而提高癌症护理质量。

实践意义

当护士表现出自信并避免间接沟通时,他们就能实现有效的沟通。在沟通交流开始时,更加关注与医生相关的身体语言和位置,可能会提高护士与医生之间沟通的有效性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77f3/8602402/93566364d79a/nihms-1683089-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77f3/8602402/93566364d79a/nihms-1683089-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77f3/8602402/93566364d79a/nihms-1683089-f0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Which Factors Promote Shared Understanding Between Physicians and Nurses in Inpatient Oncology Care Settings?: A Qualitative Exploration.哪些因素促进住院肿瘤护理环境中医生和护士之间的共同理解?:定性探讨。
Cancer Nurs. 2022;45(2):E338-E344. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000959.
2
Applying ordered network analysis to video-recorded physician-nurse interactions to examine communication patterns associated with shared understanding in inpatient oncology care settings.运用有序网络分析方法对视频记录的医患互动进行分析,以研究与住院肿瘤护理环境中共享理解相关的沟通模式。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jun 17;14(6):e084653. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084653.
3
Factors influencing physician responsiveness to nurse-initiated communication: a qualitative study.影响医生对护士发起的沟通的反应的因素:一项定性研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2021 Sep;30(9):747-754. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-011441. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
4
'This is our liver patient…': use of narratives during resident and nurse handoff conversations.“这是我们的肝病人……”:在住院医生和护士交接班对话中使用叙事。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 Feb;29(2):135-141. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-009268. Epub 2019 Jul 3.
5
A systematic review on the factors affecting effective communication between registered nurses and oncology adult patients in an inpatient setting.一项关于住院环境中影响注册护士与成年肿瘤患者之间有效沟通的因素的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2010;8(22):869-916. doi: 10.11124/01938924-201008220-00001.
6
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
7
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
8
General phenomenon and communication experience of physician and nurse in night shift communication: A qualitative study.夜班医护沟通中的一般现象和沟通体验:一项定性研究。
J Nurs Manag. 2020 May;28(4):903-911. doi: 10.1111/jonm.13018. Epub 2020 May 6.
9
A qualitative exploration of nurse-physician collaboration in intensive care units.重症监护病房护士-医师合作的定性研究。
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2022 Jun;70:103218. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2022.103218. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
10
A grounded theory of creating space for open safety communication between hospitalized patients and nurses.创造住院患者与护士之间公开安全沟通空间的扎根理论。
Nurs Outlook. 2021 Jul-Aug;69(4):632-640. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2021.01.005. Epub 2021 Feb 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Professional values, ethical climate and job satisfaction of nurses and their selected sociodemographic and occupational characteristics.护士的职业价值观、伦理氛围和工作满意度及其部分社会人口学和职业特征。
Front Public Health. 2024 Nov 5;12:1501102. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1501102. eCollection 2024.
2
The Relationships among communication competence, professional autonomy and clinical reasoning competence in oncology nurses.肿瘤护士沟通能力、专业自主性与临床推理能力的关系。
Nurs Open. 2024 Aug;11(8):e70003. doi: 10.1002/nop2.70003.
3
Applying ordered network analysis to video-recorded physician-nurse interactions to examine communication patterns associated with shared understanding in inpatient oncology care settings.

本文引用的文献

1
Formative evaluation of the video reflexive ethnography method, as applied to the physician-nurse dyad.视频反思民族志方法的形成性评价,应用于医患二人组。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 Feb;28(2):160-166. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007728. Epub 2018 Jul 14.
2
The effectiveness of assertiveness communication training programs for healthcare professionals and students: A systematic review.对医疗保健专业人员和学生进行自信沟通培训计划的有效性:系统评价。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2017 Nov;76:120-128. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.09.001. Epub 2017 Sep 5.
3
The postoperative handover: a focus group interview study with nurse anaesthetists, anaesthesiologists and PACU nurses.
运用有序网络分析方法对视频记录的医患互动进行分析,以研究与住院肿瘤护理环境中共享理解相关的沟通模式。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jun 17;14(6):e084653. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084653.
4
Identification of the barriers and enablers for receiving a speaking up message: a content analysis approach.识别接收“大声说出来”信息的障碍和促进因素:一种内容分析方法。
Adv Simul (Lond). 2023 Jul 6;8(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s41077-023-00256-1.
术后交接:对护士麻醉师、麻醉师和 PACU 护士的焦点小组访谈研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 4;7(8):e015038. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015038.
4
ICU nurses and physicians dialogue regarding patients clinical status and care options-a focus group study.重症监护病房护士与医生就患者临床状况及护理选择展开的对话——一项焦点小组研究
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2017 Dec;12(1):1267346. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2016.1267346.
5
Teams and Teamwork in Cancer Care Delivery: Shared Mental Models to Improve Planning for Discharge and Coordination of Follow-Up Care.癌症护理提供中的团队与团队合作:用于改善出院计划和后续护理协调的共享心智模型
J Oncol Pract. 2016 Nov;12(11):1053-1058. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2016.013888. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
6
Improving nurse-physician teamwork through interprofessional bedside rounding.通过跨专业床边查房改善护士与医生的团队合作。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2016 May 2;9:201-5. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S106644. eCollection 2016.
7
Improving Communication During Cardiac ICU Multidisciplinary Rounds Through Visual Display of Patient Daily Goals.通过可视化展示患者每日目标改善心脏重症监护病房多学科查房期间的沟通。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2016 Jul;17(7):677-83. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000790.
8
Effective followership: A standardized algorithm to resolve clinical conflicts and improve teamwork.有效的追随者角色:一种解决临床冲突并改善团队协作的标准化算法。
J Healthc Risk Manag. 2015;35(1):21-30. doi: 10.1002/jhrm.21174.
9
Critical Analysis of Strategies for Determining Rigor in Qualitative Inquiry.定性研究中确定严谨性策略的批判性分析
Qual Health Res. 2015 Sep;25(9):1212-22. doi: 10.1177/1049732315588501. Epub 2015 Jul 16.
10
Improving Patient Safety in Clinical Oncology: Applying Lessons From Normal Accident Theory.提高临床肿瘤学中的患者安全:应用常态意外理论的经验。
JAMA Oncol. 2015 Oct;1(7):958-64. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.0891.