Division of Nursing, College of Nursing, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, South Korea.
Graduate Program in System Health Science and Engineering, Division of Nursing, College of Nursing, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, South Korea.
Nurs Open. 2024 Aug;11(8):e70003. doi: 10.1002/nop2.70003.
To investigate the relationships among communication competence, professional autonomy and clinical reasoning and to identify the factors that influence clinical reasoning competence in oncology nurses.
Cross-sectional descriptive design.
Participants included 147 oncology nurses with more than a year of clinical experience in cancer wards. The Global Interpersonal Communication Competence Scale, Schutzenhofer Professional Autonomy Scale and Nurses Clinical Reasoning Scale (NCRS) were used to collect data. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, independent t-test, one-way ANOVA, Pearson correlation analysis and hierarchical multiple regression analysis.
Communication competence (r = 0.59) and professional autonomy (r = 0.46) showed significant positive relationships with clinical reasoning competence. Clinical experience, communication competence, age and professional autonomy were statistically significant predictors and explained 48.6% of clinical reasoning competence.
The clinical reasoning competence of oncology nurses increases proportionally with their communication competence and professional autonomy. Therefore, oncology nurses must reinforce their communication competence and professional autonomy to enhance their clinical reasoning competence.
IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE: The reinforcement of communication competence and professional autonomy is necessary for oncology nurses to enhance their clinical reasoning competence. In order to improve nurses' communication competence, practical-focused communication education programmes must be designed and deployed systematically and periodically. In addition, to increase nurses' professional autonomy, it is necessary to expand their clinical experiences through the regular rotation of working units and to make institutional efforts to retain experienced nurses.
We have adhered to STROBE checklist.
Participants in the study were recruited online. They were informed of the study's purpose, method and usability and the survey could only be conducted if they consented to participate voluntarily.
探讨沟通能力、专业自主性与临床推理之间的关系,并确定影响肿瘤科护士临床推理能力的因素。
横断面描述性设计。
参与者包括 147 名具有癌症病房临床经验超过一年的肿瘤科护士。采用全球人际交往能力量表、舒茨霍芬职业自主性量表和护士临床推理量表(NCRS)收集数据。使用描述性统计、独立 t 检验、单因素方差分析、皮尔逊相关分析和层次多重回归分析进行数据分析。
沟通能力(r=0.59)和专业自主性(r=0.46)与临床推理能力呈显著正相关。临床经验、沟通能力、年龄和专业自主性是统计学上显著的预测因素,解释了临床推理能力的 48.6%。
肿瘤科护士的临床推理能力与沟通能力和专业自主性成正比增加。因此,肿瘤科护士必须加强沟通能力和专业自主性,以提高临床推理能力。
对专业和/或患者护理的影响:加强沟通能力和专业自主性对提高肿瘤科护士的临床推理能力是必要的。为了提高护士的沟通能力,必须系统地定期设计和实施以实践为重点的沟通教育计划。此外,为了增加护士的专业自主性,有必要通过定期轮调工作单位来扩大他们的临床经验,并做出机构努力来留住有经验的护士。
我们遵循 STROBE 清单。
研究参与者是在线招募的。他们被告知了研究的目的、方法和可用性,如果他们自愿同意参与,则可以进行调查。